TRANSITION ET ARCHE


 
AccueilPortailGalerieFAQRechercherS'enregistrerConnexion

Partagez | 
 

 SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES

Voir le sujet précédent Voir le sujet suivant Aller en bas 
AuteurMessage
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Dim 25 Juil 2010 - 20:52

SATANISME ET CANNIBALISME









Il y a de nombreuses inexactitudes, dans cette vidéo; par exemple, Ted Bundy n'était pas issu d'une riche famille. La mère de Bundy, Eleanor Cowell, modeste employée dans un magasin, passa les derniers mois de sa grossesse dans une "maison pour mères non mariées" du Vermont et Ted ne connut jamais son véritable père.
Eleanor Cowell expliqua par la suite qu’il se nommait Lloyd Marshall et était vétéran de l’Air Force. Certains membres de la famille Cowell ont exprimé des doutes sur l’existence de ce Marshall et ont pointé le doigt vers le père d’Eleanor, Samuel Cowell, un homme violent et peut-être névrosé.

Peu après la naissance de Ted, sa mère et lui revinrent chez les parents d’Eleanor, à Philadelphie, qui se firent passer pour les parents du petit garçon. Ce dernier grandit en pensant que sa mère était en fait sa grande sœur.

Un an après leur arrivée à Tacoma, elle épousa un cuisinier de l’armée nommé John Bundy et Ted prit le nom de son beau-père.

On ne peut donc parler d'une riche famille.

D'ailleurs, Ted était jaloux de son cousin John, le fils du si parfait "oncle Jack" et méprisait le statut modeste de sa propre famille. Il avait honte d’être vu dans la vieille voiture de John Bundy. Il voulait toujours être habillé des plus beaux et des plus coûteux vêtements. Sa préoccupation pour les possessions matérielles s’intensifia avec l’âge.

Il y a aussi de malheureux amalgames: mouvement hippie = satanisme, tueurs en série = homosexuels,...

Cette vidéo a été faite par un religieux, le triste LLP, dont les propos racistes, anti-féministes et homophobes inondent les sites conspirationnistes, sans que ces derniers s'en émeuvent.
Toutefois, cette vidéo comportant des passages intéressants, notamment un extrait d'interview d'Ottis Toole, je l'ai quand même mise ici.












Prenez une photo de Henry Lee Lucas et une photo de George Bush Jr. Ils sont le même homme ou corps. George W. Bush est né sans nombril, tout comme le tueur en série Lucas. W a gracié Lucas, un tueur en série qui a plus de 500 meurtres à son dossier, le seul pardon accordé par W en tant que gouverneur.

Pourquoi?

Lucas effectuait le travail pour la MAIN DE LA MORT [HAND OF DEATH] - une équipe de frappe de la CIA opérant à partir du Texas DEPUIS LES ANNÉES 60.

Je connais une fille qui s'est retrouvée impliquée avec eux, pendant environ une semaine, alors qu'elle traversait le Nouveau Mexique, en 1997. Elle a habité dans leur campement, un bidonville au sud de Las Vegas, Nouveau Mexique. Il s'agit d'une collection de tueurs en série qui sont gardés ivres, drogués, et sont les pires tueurs en Amérique. La police et le FBI ne font jamais de descente sur le camp - c'est une propriété qui leur est interdite ou SINON…

Elle m'a expliqué, il y a deux ans, complètement effrayée, que ces hommes et femmes dégoûtants, couverts de tatouages, entraient et sortaient du camp, dans des CHEVROLETS SUBURBAN BLANCS. Certains se remémorant leurs meurtres, d'autres incapables d'expliquer où ils étaient pendant le dernier mois ou quoi que ce soit d'autre. Une des choses les plus horribles que j'ai eu à entendre, à faire dresser les cheveux.

Devinez qui était un visiteur fréquent de ce camp dans les années 70?

Vous connaissez déjà la réponse.

[...]

Si vous êtes nés sans nombril, c'est parce que vous avez été conçu lors d'un rituel INCUBATOIRE/SUCUBATOIRE. Ce qui veut dire, pas de connexion argentée aux 3 ventricules du cerveau et à l'aorte inférieure du cœur, là où se trouve l'atome physique permanent.

PAS D'ÂME.


vampire vampire vampire


Vous souvenez-vous du massacre de Brownsville? Lorsque le couvent où Bush Jr étudiait avait vu tous les satanistes qui le fréquentaient être assassinés, alors qu'il fut le seul survivant et ne put pas expliquer à qui que ce soit, où que ce soit, ses activités courantes pour une période de 3 jours?


vampire vampire vampire

Je regarde l'image de la Section Calendrier de l'édition du lundi 5 septembre du Los Angeles Times, et on y voit Sherry - très enceinte d'un reptile - se tenir aux côtés de David Spade, avec son accoutrement Gucci et cette marbrure rouge dans sa figure que vous pouvez voir sur la figure de George Bush… lorsqu'ils ne se sont pas nourris depuis un moment.


vampire vampire vampire

Si vous vous étiez dit que vous ne tueriez pas de reptoïdes, mais que le faire sauverait des milliers de vies qui auraient été autrement destinées à des fêtes de dégustations [d'humains] de longue date, tenues à chaque pleine lune?


vampire vampire vampire

Les illuministes au Bohemian Grove cette semaine font des sacrifices SUPPLÉMENTAIRES juste pour garder les «Maîtres" satisfaits.

Aussi, Laurence Rockefeller est mort. Il a été tué, pas à Manhattan, mais dans «THE DEVIL'S PUNCHBOWL", situé à Pearblossom, Californie, le 2ème plus important site de meurtre rituel sur la côte ouest, et ils planifient d'importants massacres de jeunes garçons et jeunes filles cette fin de semaine, kidnappés un peu partout dans les comtés de Los Angeles et San Bernandino.


vampire vampire vampire

L'expression préférée de Madonna?

« J'aime la vie. »

Continue à te nourrir de ces bébés morts, espèce de salope sans cœur venant de l'enfer. Tu es la suivante après Anthony [Hopkins].

Entends-moi bien, salope de merdeuse Nephillim.


vampire vampire vampire

J'ai des enfants. Ces choses mangent les enfants. Vous ne pouvez pas vous écraser lorsque la vie d'enfants est en jeux. À moins que vous ne soyez un vendu, une manipulation sans âme.


vampire vampire vampire

[certains] pensent que nous devrions avoir de la compassion pour les reptoïdes.

Quelle blague.

En avez-vous déjà vu un se nourrir? Non.

Avez-vous déjà vu un enfant être torturé par la CIA? Non.

Avez-vous déjà vu le VÉRITABLE mal dans le monde? Probablement pas.


vampire vampire vampire

Ces choses mangent des êtres humains. Ne vous y trompez pas. Ils se nourrissent de VOS enfants - vos fils et vos filles. Ils HAÏSSENT LES HUMAINS. HAÏSSENT LE CHRIST. HAÏSSENT LA DIVINITÉ.


vampire vampire vampire

Nous nous occupons des reptoïdes, Nous frappons éthériquement les reptoïdes. Et nous survivons pour en raconter l'histoire.

Nemesis, un stupide disciple de Lieder et de sa connexion à la CIA pense que nous devrions avoir de la compassion pour les mangeurs de bébé.

Ummmmm… écoute bien… tu m'écoutes, Nem?

POUR SERVIR LES HOMMES.

C'EST UN LIVRE DE RECETTES.



Don Bradley

étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t300-textes-extraits-du-blog-de-cbswork-don-bradley
étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t350-textes-extraits-du-blog-de-cbswork-suite-don-bradley









An Interview With Ottis Toole: The Cannibal Kid
by Billy Bob Barton




Ottis Toole (5 mars 1947 - 15 septembre 1996) était un tueur en série et cannibale américain qui a été reconnu coupable de six meurtres en 1984 alors qu'il en confessait une centaine.

Il est né en 1947 à Jacksonville, en Floride. Violé depuis son plus jeune âge par son père, puis par son beau-père, il est poussé à la prostitution masculine par sa sœur aînée et initié à des rituels diaboliques par sa grand-mère. En effet, cette dernière étant sataniste, elle l'oblige à participer à des sacrifices d'animaux et à des profanations de cadavres qu'elle déterre elle-même dans les cimetières.

Il commet son premier meurtre avec cannibalisme à 14 ans. Arrêté pour la première fois en août 1964 pour vol, il est très vite relâché. Sa vraie carrière d'assassin commence en 1976, quand il rencontre Henry Lee Lucas, qui devient son amant. Il est de nouveau arrêté en 1983 en Floride, et est reconnu coupable du meurtre de George Sonnenberg et Ada Johnson puis avoue 4 autres meurtres dont celui de Adam Walsh. Il avoue ensuite avoir commis 108 homicides avec Lucas.

Ottis Toole est condamné à la peine de mort en 1984, peine commuée ensuite en prison à vie. Il meurt en détention d'une maladie opportuniste du foie liée au sida le 15 septembre 1996. http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottis_Toole




The following article is reprinted from Mike Diana's "The Worst Of Boiled Angel". Ottis Toole is a convicted killer responsible for, by his own approximations, hundred of deaths. The included tabloid article is taken from the October 15, 1996 issue of 'GLOBE'.

Let me tell you something: as a crime beat journalist I've met every kind of criminal scum known to mankind, a few I believed were aliens from other planets. I've interviewed Ted Bundy who knawed on the naked buttocks of a dead college coed and who fucked the week-old rotting, headless corpse of Denise Noslund in Washington State. The law never got him for that one, Bundy fried for strangling and raping the remains of a Florida schoolgirl. Bundy was so depraved that he radiated evil like a supernova. Pure scumbag.

I've chatted with serial murderess Margie Barfield who had a habit of poisoning her victims. I saw her at the North Carolina Prison for Women shortly before she was executed. She was smiling, hymn-singing, bible-thumping bag of shit who'd make you feel comfortable while pouring rat poison down your throat.

I've talked to the worst criminals on Earth - or so I thought - but nothing prepared me for my meeting with Ottis Toole, the infamous Cannibal Kid, who recently was sentenced to a mandatory 100 years in North Florida. I wrote this character a letter while he was in prison near Appilachocola but didn't catch up to him until he was sent to the infamous Florida State Prison near Starke.

The Florida State Prison is a built on a pestiferous swamp. The mosquitos almost sucked me dry as I waited to be cleared for entry into this state sponsored septic tank of a prison. A sweating fat black maggot of a prison cop wearing a shit-brown uniform examined my credentials as the vermin attacked my bare skin. I swatted the bugs as the insolent toad looked me over as if I was a new arrival for the eletric chair. There isn't any speices of human lower than a prison guard. They're far more corrupt than the criminals they watch over. In my oppinion, they're blubbergutted, tobacco spitting, animated balls of feces. Only a pervert would work in a prison and at the Florida State Prison I saw these brown-shirted perverts aplenty.

Finally I was approved for entry into the prison and was escorted to the interview area by a swishing, limp-wristed homosexual "Classification Specialist". I was afraid to ask what the pussy-boy specialized in. "He" was a "she" and a genuine charmer. Finally I was put in a little room and a chained human monster by the name of Ottis Toole was led in by a squad of prison goons. They threw Toole into a chair but left the chains on him. Toole glared at their backs as they left the room. Finally he looked at me; I looked at him andsaid, "I'm Billy Bob. Is it true you eat people or that is just bullshit?"

Toole looked me over as if I were a whopper and said "You look damn tasty. If I had me a knife I'd slit your throat and drink some blood."

I noticed Toole began to drool a bit at the idea of dicing me up for stewmeat. His eyes were red and crazy, he began to pant and hiss like a hungry animal. He liked the idea of munching on human meat.




"They tell me you eat young boys," I said.

"I've eaten my share," Toole admitted

"Tell me about it," I said.

Toole cocked his head to one side, said in a weird squeaky little voice, "First I go out and catch me a little boy, maybe go down to a mall or shopping center and grab one there...grab him, tie him up, use a gag, put him in the trunk of my car and drive him to my place out in the swamps. Nobody to bother me way out there."

"Did you rape those boys?"

"Yeah, I give it to 'em in the butt."

"Make them scream?"

"Naw, they have on a gag. Can't scream."

"Ever fuck little girls?"

"Sure. Fuck'em in the butt same as a boy."

"Yeah, why's that?"

"A girl 8 or 9 years old, her pussy ain't able to take a big dick. She can take it up her butt same as a boy. I prefer a boy. I make his peter get hard, a boy maybe 12 years old, I can make him shoot jizz every time while I'm up his ass. A girl, she doesn't do nothing. Ain't much fun."

"You fuck'em, then you kill'em?"

"Yeah. So what? I like it."

"Ever kill any adult people?"

"Plenty of'em. All the time-men, women, kids."

"How'd you kill them?"

"All kinds of ways. Strangle some with a belt. Shoot some. Cut some throats."

"I read where you use a bar-b-que sauce when you eat those kids. Is that true?"

"Yeah, I have my own recipe."

"Tell me how you cook a young boy or girl."

"After the fucking then you strip them naked and hang them upside down by ankles; then slit their throat with a knife, slit the belly and take out the guts, the liver, the heart. Cut off the head. Let the blood drain."

"Do you have a big fire?"

"A pit. A bar-q-que pit. Charcoal so there ain't much smoke. Take down the body, put the metal spit through them. Put it into the asshole, through the body and out the neck, wire the meat to the spit, put it on the spit-holder over the coals. Damn tasty."

"Just how does a little boy bar-q-que taste, Ottis?"

"Same as a roasted piglet. Boys and girls taste about the same when you roast them 8 to 10 years old. The flavor is a shade different when they're teenagers. The boys are gamier than the girls. Give me the roasted meat of a boy age 14 and a girl age 14 and I can tell the difference when you use a spicy sauce."

"Ever kill teenagers?"

"Sure. Get a pair of lovers parking in the woods. Easy to catch them. Teenagers make a nice roast, I do favor a rump roast from a teen. Younger ones I think I prefer ribs. Juicy. Tasty. Younought to try some."

"You're a sick fucker! Anyone ever told you that?"

"Sure. Plenty have told me. I got off death row because they said I'm too sick to burn on the eletric chair. Nobody came around to try to cure me. They give me some pill. People eat pigs, cows, horses. I like to eat people. It's good meat, too. You ain't tried it, don't be saying it ain't tasty. You might like it."

"How many people have you killed and eaten?"

"Just me killing them alone or the ones I killed and ate with Henry?"

"You were doing this with Henry Lucas, too?"

"Yeah, we'd mostly eat hitch hikers."

"All together how many do you think?"

"Oh, probably about 150 or so."

"Incredible! And the police never caught you?"

"Ain't no police out in the woods."



"Henry Lee Lucas says now that he didn't kill all those people, that he was making it all up. What do you say about that?"

"We killed over 200 when we was roaming the country together. Maybe he killed more before he met me or after we split. I'd say around 200 for sure, I got over 100 my own self. Henry said he got about 400 all together, I don't know for sure. I really don't."

"Do you recall any memorable killings?"

"Oh yeah, I remember Shelly."

"Shelly, is that a boy or a girl?"

"A young woman about 20 or 25, around there."

"What do you remember?"

"I got her when she was hitch hiking in Colorado. I had me an old pick-up truck. I picked her up, took her up into the Rocky Mountains and killed her. She was naked when I killed her. A pretty one. It was the summertime in 1974 and what was funny is that the police blamed the killing on Ted Bundy but Ted didn't get that one, I got her."

"Ever hear of anyone else being blamed for killings you did?"

"Yeah. I got me a chinese girl out by Colorado Springs in 1974; cut her throat and she had a friend and I stabbed her up, too. The cop got a guy named Estep for that case but I did it. Cops don't always get the right person."

"Kill anyone else in Colorado?"

"Oh yeah, I remember a girl. Ellen, late twenties or early thirties in age, I got her down by Pueblo, Colorado, we rode east. I shot that one, shot her throught the head."

"Did you fuck them?"

"Sometimes. I fucked them the way I fuck a boy. Make them take it up the ass. I ain't into pussy but a girl's a sshole is about the same as a man's."

"Did you eat Patty?"

"No. Not her. I shot her; didn't eat her or cut off a hunk to eat later. Just left her lying dead."

"Were you involved with a Death Cult then?"

"No, not then. That was around 1974. I joined the cult in the 1980's, early 80's. I was in it with Henry."

"Tell me about it."

"It was THE HAND OF DEATH. We were working for that cult and we'd grab little kids for the human sacrifices, grab young women for the snuff movies. We'd tie the women up and haul them to Mexico, only the ones that come out there. I liked working for THE HAND OF DEATH. They'd let me have the corpses when they were done with the films or sacrifices and I could take a prime cut. We got most on those people from Texas since it's near the border with Mexico. There were several Death Cults down there. I heard that a few years ago the police busted one near Matamoros. That wasn't THE HAND OF DEATH, it was a different one."


The "hand of death"

"What's a human sacrifice like?"

"Secret rituals, I can't reveal it to anyone."

"Generally. Tell me generally."

"Put them on the altar and cut their throat; then make a burnt offering to the Devil. Like that generally."

"Who? Women? Kids?"

"Virgins were preferred. Girls of teenage years."

"Virgins sacrifice?"

"Yeah, slit the throat, collect the blood in a goblet, pass it around and drink it hot. Do chants. It's secret stuff. You aren't supposed to reveal it. They make you take an oath for secrecy."

"You drank human blood from a cup?"

"Yeah, it's in the ritual."

"What's it taste like?"

"Kinda salty. Not so good. I like cooked meat. I didn't mind eating the cooked parts."

"Is eating human flesh part of the rituals?"

"Sometimes."

"What parts are ritually eaten?"

"Well, I'm not allowed to tell about it."

"Just tell a little."

"We had a ritual where we ate sex parts."

"Tell about that."

"The women parts were the titty nipples and the hole where the dick goes in."

"The vagina."

"I guess. It's like a little bag of muscle."

"You'd cut out their cunts?"

"Whatever it's called. A sex part. A hole the woman has."

"What about the males?"

"Cut off the peter, cut off the balls."

"You fry it all up?"

"No, it's put in like a little stewpot. The guy who cooks it makes it like a soup or stew. It's a secret recipe from about a thousand years ago."

"Taste good?"

"Not bad. The part of the woman around the pussy hole is like lips. Sort of chewy and rubbery. The balls are damned good when fried. Use a little batter and a fryer and it's a real treat. Crispy. Like a crispy chestnut. Fresh fried balls is one of my favorites."

"What's eating the sex parts supposed to do for you?"

"Gives you increased sexual potency. Powers."

"Right. You believe that?"

"I don't know. I prefer to eat the ribs actually but I go along with what's being served at the ceremonies."

"Where was this weird shit going down, Ottis?"

"Mexico, a ranch down there."

"And these were all virgins you ate and cut up?"

"I don't know. Me and Henry would drive up to Texas and collect women. Girls. We'd just catch those we come upon."

"Tell me about that part."

"Certain times of the year the priests wanted virgins for the human sacrifices. They'd say to me and Henry to go up to texas and collect some. We'd drive on up. get girls hitch hiking, pick up vans at bars, there are a lot of women just walking down the road in South Texas. Migrant workers. We'd get them, tie them up, gag them, put them in the trunk. We fill the trunk, 6 or 8 girls, then go back to Mexico. Down at the ranch the priests check them for virgins."

"How did they check?"

"Took down their pants and looked at that hole. The hole is smaller on virgins. Something about that hole, I'm not into women. The priests took the virgins to one building and the non-virgins went to where they made snuff films."

"Ever see any of these films being made?"

"Yeah."

"What did you see?"

"A political movie about Paris, France, in the old days. They had a machine that cut off a womans head."

"A guilloine?"

"Yeah, I think so."

"Tell about it."

"The woman i strapped to a board. Her neck is locked in between a thing, her head is sticking out of a hole on the board. A big knife drops and cuts off her head. The head falls into a basket."

"You watched?"

"Yeah, it was interesting. Her name was Charlotte."

"You knew her name?"

"Her movie name, I guess. She was political. Broke some law, so they cut off her head. Blood squirted all over the place. It was an old timey execution."

"Did you sacrifice any virgins?"

"No, never did. Priests did all that."

"You saw it?"

"Oh sure, we all saw it."

"What did you see? Tell how a virgin is sacrificed."

"The high priest is dressed in a goat costume. He stands behind the virgin. She's chained belly down to the sacrificial block with her buttocks raised and spread. There is a second high priest who has the knife. They do the chants, ceremonies, the secret things I can't tell about. Then the priest in front pulls the virgins head back by her hair and puts the knife against her throat. The one behind her steps up and puts his dick into her sex hole and when she screams the priest in front slits her throat. It's all secret rites."

"How many virgins are sacrificed?"

"The main ceremony, once a year calls for 13 virgins. That's the big ritual. Ususally it's only one virgin."



"Do you really expect me to believe you saw 13 virgins sacrificed at one time? There aren't even 13 virgins left in America. Give me a fucking break, Ottis!"

"It's not all at once. One at a time, all night long because each ceremony, at sundown and the last, at sunrise which is about an hour. The first one is a black girl, she is sacrificed to the prince of darkness at the exact moment of sundown. During the night virgins are sacrificed to specific demons. Those virgins are usually Latinas. The last virgin, the 13th, is sacrificed to Lucifer, Son of the Morning; always a blond girl is used and her throat is cut at sunrise.She's called the Sun Princess. She has two slavegirl attendants who are sacrificed with her, they go with her into the Heart Of The Sun."

"Ottis, you're crazy!"

"The year I first saw the Ceremonies the Sun Princess was a teenage girl, a white-blond from Houston. Her cult name was "Taireina" which is "Morning Star". The year I saw it the Sun Princess was an American, so was the black girl, the others were Latinas. I saw the rituals. THE HANDS OF DEATH are a most secret cult; I've already said too much!"

"You and Lucas were involved in this shit?"

"Yeah, but Henry wants to deny everything now because he's trying to avoid being executed. I'm too crazy for execution so I can tell you how it really was. Henry killed a lot of people. I know, I was there. I helped him do the murders."

"We're running out of time Ottis. Do you have any particularly fond memories of your days together with Henry Lucas? He's the one they made the movie about, not you. He's famous, you're a nobody. A prison faggot. What's your last word?"

"Henry is going to be executed but I'll be alive surrounded by cute fuck-boys. I have everything I want in prison. Except I miss the freedom to drive down the highway robbing and killing from town to town. That's excitment at its best and miss being able to bar-b-que a boy when I get the urge. I did like to bar-b-que. You can write it your story that anyone who wants to write me and get a recipe for my home made sauce, I'll send it free. Just send a few stamps for the reply letter. That's all honey."




source:
freddy http://canibuscentral.ihiphop.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t2347-0.html




Dernière édition par invitée le Ven 28 Déc 2012 - 18:49, édité 27 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Dim 1 Aoû 2010 - 2:57

LE CAS HENRY LEE LUCAS







Né en 1937 à Balcksburg, Henry Lucas est le fils d'une prostituée et d'un cheminot.

La mère de Lucas, Madame Viola Dixons, est la plupart du temps sous l'emprise de l'alcool et bat continuellement ses enfants. Ses sept premiers enfants, issus de son premier mariage, ont été confiés à un foyer d'accueil; elle a Henry d'un second mariage. Pour des raisons inconnues, elle forçe son fils à mettre des robes et à garder les cheveux longs.
Un jour, Viola frappe si violemment son fils qu'il reste inconscient pendant trois jours, ce qui provoque un traumatisme cérébral irréversible.
Le sort s'acharne contre le jeune Henry lorsqu'Andrew, son frère aîné, le blesse accidentellement à l'oeil avec un canif, et que, quelque temps plus tard, une institutrice, voulant frapper un élève avec une règle, touche Henry par erreur, causant la perte définitive de son oeil.

Le père d'Henry, Anderson Lucas, a perdu ses deux jambes dans un accident de train. Il meurt en 1950: Henry a alors 13 ans.
À cet âge, Henry a déjà connu de nombreuses expériences sexuelles, notamment avec des animaux, et manifeste des tendances sadiques.
À dix ans, il avait été initié à une sexualité perverse par l'amant de sa mère, un simple d'esprit nommé bernie Dowdy. Un jour, Dowdy égorge un veau avant d'avoir des relations sexuelles avec le cadavre de l'animal. Il enjoint Henry à faire de même, et le gaçon y éprouve tellement de plaisir, qu'à partir de ce moment, il associe systèmatiquement plaisir sexuel et violence.

Il avoua avoir écorché des animaux vivants pour le plaisir.
Lors de ses aveux, il reconnu avoir commis son premier meurtre à l'age de 14 ans. Il avait assommé une jeune fille de 17 ans à un arrêt de bus afin de la violer, mais celle-ci ayant repris connaissance et s'étant mise à crier, il l'avait alors étranglée.
Ce fut le premier meurtre d'une longue série.

Mais, à cette époque, il est avant tout un cambrioleur averti. En 1952, il est condamné à un an de maison de correction pour vol avec effraction.
À sa sortie, il travaille comme journalier et ouvrier agricole, puis est de nouveau condamné et incarcéré pour vol. Il s'évade et rencontre une jeune fille prénommée Stella dont il tombe amoureux. Il s'assagit alors.
Quatre ans plus tard, Stella accepte de l'épouser, mais la mère d'Henry, apprenant la nouvelle, se précipite chez eux et affirme qu'elle a besoin d'Henry pour qu'il s'occuppe d'elle. Une violente dispute s'ensuit, au cours de laquelle Henry tue sa mère. Il quitte alors le Michigan, mais est rapidement retrouvé par la police et condamné à 40 ans de prison.
En 1970, libéré sur parole, il retourne vivre au Michigan.
En 1971, il agresse deux jeunes femmes et tente de les forcer à monter dans sa voiture, sous la menace d'un pistolet, mais elles parviennent à s'enfuir. Les deux jeunes femmes, qui ont pu noter le numéro de sa plaque d'immatricualtion, appellent la police.
Henry est de nouveau arrêté et incarcéré pour 4 ans. Il déclara alors: « J'ai un problème sexuel, je désire sans cesse les femmes ».

Libéré fin aout 1975, il s'installe Pensylvanie et, le 5 décembre, il épouse Betty Crawford, maman de deux filles. Henry a rapidement des relations sexuelles avec la plus jeune, âgée de neuf ans, et tente de violer à plusieurs reprises la plus grande, âgée de 17 ans, mais n'y parviendra qu'une seule fois. Le mariage se brise en 1977 et Henry va alors s'installer chez sa soeur Wanda. Mais il est contraint de quitter le domicile quand celle-ci l'accuse d'avoir des relations sexuelles avec sa petite fille.

De passage en Floride, Henry rencontre Ottis Toole dans une soupe populaire à Jacksonville. Ottis a passé pas mal se temps en prison pour des vols de voitures et des délits mineurs. Ils deviennent rapidement amants et se lancent dans une série de cambriolages qui se terminent souvent par des meurtres.
Comme Henry, Ottis éprouve une immense rancune envers la société. Ses manières efféminées et sa lenteur provoquaient les railleries et le rejet de ses camarades d'école.
Plus tard, il décida de changer de sexe et commença à prendre des oestrogènes pour se travestir en femme. Toole est lui aussi sadique, mais il agit sous l'influence de Lucas dont la personnalité est nettement plus dominante et plus meurtrière.
Henry Lucas et Ottis Toole commencent à commettre des hold-up dans les épiceries dont ils poussent les propriétaires ou les vendeurs dans l'arrière-boutique où il les ligotent. Une fois, une jeune vendeuse qui tentait de se débattre malgré ses liens est froidement tuée d'une balle dans la tête par Lucas, et Toole a des rapports sexuels avec son cadavre.

En 1978, Henry est introduit dans une secte satanique, "La Main de la mort"; s'ensuit alors une période de meurtres en série de près de 7 ans à travers de nombreux états.












Sympathy for the Devil



« Henry is an unusual prisoner. He's been given a high security cell and a few special amenities ... » — Jim Boutwell, Sheriff of Williamson County, Texas

On June 30th of 1998, Henry Lee Lucas, arguably the most prolific and certainly one of the most sadistic serial killers in the annals of crime was scheduled for execution by the state of Texas. Given the advocacy of the death penalty by Governor George W. Bush, things clearly weren't looking good for Henry at that time.

Bush had not granted clemency to any condemned man in his tenure as governor. In fact, no governor of any state in the entire history of the country has carried out more judicial executions than has Governor George. At last count, the state of Texas had dispatched 130 inmates on Bush's watch.

So Texas was definitely not the place to be for a man in Henry's position. And considering the nature of Henry's crimes, it seemed a certainty that nothing would stand in the way of Henry's scheduled execution. There weren't likely to be any high-profile supporters, a la Karla Faye Tucker (though even personal appeals to Bush from the likes of Pat Robertson failed to dissuade the governor from proceeding on schedule with Miss Tucker's execution). Not likely because Henry's crimes were of a particularly brutal nature, involving rape, torture, mutilation, dismemberment, necrophilia, cannibalism, and pedophilia, with the number of victims running as high as 300-600 by some accounts - including Henry's own, at times - though this figure is likely inflated.

By all accounts though, Lucas, frequently working with partner Ottis Toole - a self described arsonist and cannibal - savagely murdered literally scores of victims of all ages, races, and genders. All indications were then that this was pretty much of a no-brainer for America's premier hanging governor. But then a most remarkable thing happened. On June 18, just twelve days before Henry's scheduled demise, Governor Bush asked the State Board of Pardons and Paroles, whose members are appointed by Bush himself, to review Henry's case. Strangely enough, eight days later the Board uncharacteristically recommended that Henry's execution not take place.

The very next day, just three days short of Henry's scheduled exit from this world, Lucas became the first - and to date only - recipient of Governor Bush's compassionate conservatism. The official rationale for this act of mercy was, apparently, that the evidence on which Lucas was sentenced did not support his conviction. There was a possibility that Henry was in fact innocent of the crime for which he was convicted. Never mind that many of the 130 death row inmates who did not get special gubernatorial attention prior to their executions had credible claims of innocence that were met with by nothing but scorn and mockery.

Suddenly Little George had developed a keen interest in not executing innocent convicts. Never mind as well that some of those who have been executed despite claims of innocence were - other than the crime for which they were being executed - law-abiding citizens. Whereas Henry was by all accounts a serial rapist, kidnapper, torturer and murderer. And never mind that once Henry was spared, Bush promptly lost this passing interest and began once again rubber stamping every execution order that crossed his desk, including that of a great-grandmother in her sixties who was convicted of killing her chronically abusive husband (Betty Lou Beets, in February 2000).

And never mind that Bush has made no effort in the two years since Henry's commutation to seek a new trial for Henry on one of the murders for which there is conclusive evidence of Lucas' guilt. Neither has he made any effort to extradite Henry to any of the other states in which Henry is wanted for various murders. It seems to me that the last time I checked, there was no statute of limitations for the crime of murder. Why is Law-and-Order George not seeking a new death sentence for Lucas? And why is it that Henry was granted full clemency, rather than a temporary stay during which his case could have been reviewed? This is exactly what Bush has just done in the case of convicted murderer Ricky Nolen McGinn.

Tellingly, the proliferation of press reports on the McGinn case, apparently meant to soften Bush's image somewhat, have made virtually no reference to the governor's earlier actions on behalf of Lucas. Reporting on the McGinn case has avoided the mention of Lucas in one of two ways: by noting that this is the first capital case for which Bush has issued a stay (which is true but deliberately deceptive), or by claiming outright that this is the first death penalty case in which Bush has intervened (which is an outright and absolutely shameless lie).

And what if Lucas was in fact falsely convicted and his innocence was so blatantly obvious that the governor had no choice but to commute Henry's sentence? What then does this say about the Texas criminal justice system and the ease with which it sends innocent men to their deaths? Are we to believe that Henry's case was an isolated one and that none of the other men put to death during Bush's reign had equally credible claims of innocence?

Clearly, there was something more at work then in the Lucas case than simply a question of guilt. There had to be another reason why Bush would take such extraordinary steps to spare the life of a man who had led a life of such brutality. And this was certainly not the first time that the criminal justice system had shown such extraordinary leniency towards Lucas.

The first big break for Henry came around 1970, when he was released early from a sentence he was then serving following his first murder conviction. Sentenced to 20-40 years, Henry was released after serving just ten. This occurred just after Henry appeared before the parole board and explained to them that he wasn't ready to return to society and would surely kill again if released. As Henry tells it, the questioning went something like this: « Now Mr. Lucas, I must ask you, if we grant you parole, will you kill again? » Henry: « Yes, sir! If you release me now, I will kill again. »

Nevertheless, the board decided that ten years was an adequate amount of time to serve for the crime of killing one's mother and then violating the corpse. Fair enough. Within a year, of course, Henry found himself back in prison, this time for attempting to abduct a young girl. Despite his prior record - which began long before killing his mother - Lucas served just four years and was again released early, this time in August of 1975. Shortly thereafter, Henry and his new friend Ottis would commit an untold number of lurid murders spanning the next eight years. Henry would finally be arrested in October of 1982 on suspicion of two murders, only to be promptly released. He was not arrested again until June of 1983, and has been imprisoned ever since.

After his final arrest, Henry was taken on tour, so to speak, by various law enforcement officials around the country, during which time he confessed to some 600 murders in 26 states. There were various charges made at the time that Henry was being used by his escorts to clear troublesome unsolved murders in places he had never even been.

This quite likely was the case. Henry seemed to have a very chummy relationship with his captors, particularly the Texas Rangers, and provided a valuable service for them by taking the rap for an amazing array of murders. This alone, however, does not explain the personal attention given to Henry's case by Governor Bush.

For that, we need to look at some of the more infrequently noted details of Henry's life history, many of them provided by Lucas himself. Henry, as it turns out, has some interesting stories to tell. In 1985, just a couple years into his incarceration, he attempted to tell his story in a book, written for him by a sympathetic author. The book, titled The Hand of Death: The Henry Lee Lucas Story, tells of Henry's indoctrination into a nationwide Satanic cult. Lucas claimed that he was trained by the cult in a mobile paramilitary camp in the Florida Everglades in the fine art of killing, up close and personal. Other training involved abduction and arson techniques.

He further claimed that leaders of the camp were so impressed with Henry's handling of a knife that he was allowed to serve as an instructor. Following his training, Henry claimed to have served the cult in various ways, including as a contract killer and as an abductor of children, who were then taken just over the border to a ranch in Mexico near Juarez. Henry has said that this cult operated out of Texas and from a ranch in northern Mexico, trafficking in children and drugs, among other nefarious pursuits. In essence, Henry claimed that what appeared to be the random work of a serial killer was in fact a planned series of crimes often committed for specific purposes.

Some of the murders were political hits, according to Henry, including the occasional assassination of foreign dignitaries. This was not true for all of Henry's crimes. Some he did just because that's what he liked to do. And it was the one thing that he was really good at.

The beauty of this arrangement was that it allowed Henry to conceal the true motive for many of his crimes. Those performed as contract hits looked like all of Henry's murders - senseless and random acts of violence. In Henry's version of events, it was Toole who was responsible for Henry's recruitment and training by the cult and many of the pair's exploits thereafter. Interestingly, in all the standard biographies of the pair, Toole is said to have been Henry's severely retarded junior partner.

It is quite clear from reading an interview granted by Toole to a journalist (of sorts) that he was not by any means retarded. Uneducated, no doubt, but definitely not severely retarded. Toole was in fact able to express himself quite clearly, though perversely, and displayed a substantial level of knowledge about the practices of Satanism. In fact, Toole - prior to his death in 1996- was able to give detailed accounts of he and Henry's activities that largely corroborated Henry's stories about the cult. But beyond the stories told by these two credibility-challenged witness/participants, is there any reason to believe Henry's bizarre tale of being a contract killer?

And what of Henry's other stories, including the one about being a close friend of Jim Jones of the People's Temple? Henry has claimed on numerous occasions that it was he who personally delivered the cyanide to Jones that was used in the infamous Jonestown massacre.

What are we to make of such stories? Could Henry have been telling the truth about being a contract killer? And if so, did the contracts he was receiving have some kind of government connection? Though Henry never broaches the subject in his book, the training camp as he describes it clearly had military connections. And Henry has explicitly stated that the cult included among its members various prominent persons, including high level politicians. Could this be the reason for the actions taken by Governor Bush in June of 1998?

« They think I'm stupid, but before this is all over everyone will know who's really stupid. And we'll see who the real criminals are. » — Henry Lee Lucas

« A U.S. Navy psychologist, who claims that the Office of Naval Intelligence had taken convicted murderers from military prisons, used behavior modification techniques on them, and then relocated them in American embassies throughout the world ... The Navy psychologist was Lt. Commander Thomas Narut of the U.S. Regional Medical Center in Naples, Italy. The information was divulged at an Oslo NATO conference of 120 psychologists from the eleven nation alliance ... The Navy provided all the funding necessary, according To Narut.

Dr. Narut, in a question and answer session with reporters from many nations, revealed how the Navy was secretly programming large numbers of assassins. He said that the men he had worked with for the Navy were being prepared for commando-type operations, as well as covert operations in U.S. embassies worldwide. He described the men who went through his program as "hit men and assassins" who could kill on command.

Careful screening of the subjects was accomplished by Navy psychologists through the military records ... and many were convicted murderers serving military prison sentences.
» — Harry V. Martin and David Caul "Mind Control", Napa Valley Sentinel, August-November 1991.

Anyone familiar with the intelligence community's long-standing obsession with the concept of mind control will immediately recognize what Dr. Narut was describing as an MK-ULTRA project. The existence of this particular manifestation of the project was first reported by British journalist Peter Watson of the Sunday Times, who attended the conference and interviewed Dr. Narut. Narut told him that they looked for candidates who had shown a proclivity for violence.

This was at a time when numerous pseudo investigations of the intelligence community were underway, including the Rockefeller, Pike, and Church Committees. Narut told Watson that he was revealing this highly classified information only because he assumed it was about to surface anyway.

Of course, Narut was mistaken about the interest of the various committees in divulging anything even remotely resembling the truth. Narut promptly disappeared from public view, reappearing only briefly to lamely attempt to retract his prior statements. But it was a little too late.

Watson went on to expand upon this initial research to produce a book, War on the Mind, one of the better books from the late 1970's on the subject of mind control research by the intelligence community. Walter Bowart referenced Watson's work as well, in his nearly impossible to find Operation Mind Control. So this cat, once let out of the bag, proved rather difficult to stuff back inside. The intelligence community, it seemed, was recruiting from prisons to make use of the natural talents of convicted killers to produce the fabled "Manchurian Candidates" - mind controlled assassins.

This operation involved killers drawn from military prisons, though there is no reason not to suspect that parallel programs were being conducted in civilian prisons as well. Prisons have, after all, provided fertile ground for any number of MK-ULTRA sub projects for decades. As the Napa Valley Sentinel article noted: « Mind control experiments ... permeate mental institutions and prisons. » This was particularly true in the 1960's and 1970's. The NATO conference at which Dr. Narut dropped his bombshell was held in July of 1975. Strangely enough, the very next month Henry would be released to begin his eight year reign of terror.

Clearly of relevance here is the fact that Lucas, during his prior ten year prison stay, spent four and a half of those years in a mental ward. During this time, he received intensive drug and electroshock treatments. He would later describe this period of incarceration as a « nightmare that would not end. » Also during this time, he complained chronically about hearing voices in his head, taunting him day and night (ostensibly the reason for his confinement in the mental ward, though it could well have been the result of his confinement and treatment). Henry would later spend additional time in an institution in 1980, in the midst of his killing spree.

Was Henry recruited and programmed while in prison to be used latter by the so-called Hand of Death cult? The possibility clearly is there. He certainly had shown a voracious appetite for violence, enough so to make him a very attractive candidate. Indeed, Henry is just the kind of man to be considered a valuable asset by the intelligence community.

For anyone who doubts that the CIA (or any other of the numerous interwoven intelligence agencies) would recruit such a man, it is important to remember that we are talking about the same agencies that recruited some of the most bloodthirsty butchers of the Third Reich - men such as Klaus Barbie, Joseph Mengele, Adolf Eichmann, Otto Skorzeny, and Reinhard Gehlen.

Henry's depravity pales in the shadows of men such as these. Henry probably couldn't even hold his own against some of the organized crime figures - such as Lucky Luciano, Meyer Lansky and Santos Trafficante who were likewise recruited by the CIA. Or against the numerous thugs that the spooks have propped up as dictators around the world, men such as Somoza, Pinochet, Duvalier and Pahlavi, to name just a few.

In the company of men such as these, Henry would be just one of the boys. No less valuable an asset than, say, Dan Mitrione, the CIA torture aficionado who was a boyhood friend of Jim Jones. This man, known for having homeless persons kidnapped for the purpose of giving torture demonstrations to South American security forces in his soundproof underground chamber of horrors, was hailed as a hero and martyr when he himself was tortured and killed. Hell, Frank Sinatra and Jerry Lewis flew into his home town and performed a benefit show to raise money for the widow of this great American. So in the world of spooks, Henry would be in good company. As would his partner, Ottis Toole, who wouldn't even have the distinction of being the only cannibal recruited by the CIA.

As Douglas Valentine writes in The Phoenix Program (Morrow, 1990)- concerning the CIA's assassination, torture and terror program waged against the people of Vietnam - the Phoenix teams consisted of SEALs working with "CTs," described by one participant as « a combination of ARVN deserters, VC turncoats, and bad motherfucker criminals the South Vietnamese couldn't deal with in prison, so they turned them over to us. » The spooks were only too happy to employ the services of these men, who « taught [their] SEAL comrades the secrets of the psy war campaign. » So depraved were these agency recruits that some of them « would actually devour their enemies' vital organs. » All in a day's work for America's premier intelligence agency.

Also included in the CIA rogue's gallery of distinguished alumni, according to a number of researchers, is Lucas' self-described "close friend," the notorious Jim Jones. What then are we to make of Henry's professed connection to the tragic People's Temple? It has been documented by numerous investigators that the Jonestown massacre was not by any means a case of mass suicide, as was reported by the U.S. press. It was in fact a case of mass murder. The Guyanese coroner, Dr. C. Leslie Mootoo, concluded that only three of the 913 victims at Jonestown died by means of suicide on that fateful day. All of the rest were executed, some by lethal injection, some by strangulation, and some simply shot through the head.

It is apparent then that if Lucas was in fact at Jonestown at the time of the mass murder, he was quite likely doing considerably more than just serving as a delivery boy. A man of Henry's talents would bean invaluable asset in a clean-up operation of this type. And what was being cleaned up was, of course, yet another MK-ULTRA project, complete with vast stockpiles of drugs, sensory deprivation equipment, and a band of zombie-like assassins who gunned down Congressman Leo Ryan's entourage just prior to the massacre (thus necessitating the clean-up operation.)

Strange that Henry would claim a connection to a man whose operation was notable primarily for being a breeding ground for mind control and mass murder. Of course Henry, being uneducated and illiterate, would not likely have had access to this information.

Even if Henry was literate, he would not have known the story that Maury Terry was to later tell in his book, The Ultimate Evil. Told therein is a tale that chillingly parallels that of Henry and Ottis. What Terry revealed was that the murders attributed to the Son of Sam, the Manson Family, and numerous other interconnected killings (including possibly the Zodiac murders) were not what they appeared to be.

While these killings appeared to be the random work of serial/mass murderers, they actually were contract hits carried out for specific purposes by an interlocking network of Satanic cults (this book has, by the way, recently been reprinted by Barnes & Noble - go figure - and is highly recommended to anyone who questions the plausibility of Henry's story.) In other words, these were professional hits orchestrated and disguised to look like the work of yet another 'lone nut' serial killer. Which is, of course, exactly what Henry claimed his crimes to be, several years before investigative journalist Terry published his convincingly documented work.

Lucas' story then, as bizarre as it may appear to be, is certainly not without precedent. Other events that have transpired since Henry first began telling his tales of The Hand of Death lend further credence to various aspects of his story. For example, there is the issue of the cult-run ranch just south of the border. While this may have sounded rather far-fetched back in the early 1980's, it certainly doesn't today. In 1990, just such a ranch was excavated in Matamoros, Mexico, yielding the remains of over a dozen ritual sacrifice victims. While Ottis Toole - still alive at the time - noted that this was not the specific ranch with which he and Henry were associated, he also mentioned that there were numerous such operations in the area.

So closely did the Matamoros case parallel the stories told years before by Lucas that some law enforcement personnel in Texas chose to take a closer look at Henry's professed cult connections. In fact, Jim Boutwell, sheriff of Williamson County, Texas later told a reporter that investigators had verified that Lucas was indeed involved in cult activities. And a decade later, yet another excavation was begun, this time at a ranch near Juarez, Mexico, which is precisely where Henry claimed it to be. This story made a brief appearance in the American press in December of 1999, until U.S. officials moved in to take over the investigation, after which coverage promptly ceased.

Of course, it could just have been lucky guesses by Henry about the cult-run ranches and the networks of Satanic cults running murder-for-hire operations. And it could just be a coincidence that Toole, who was convicted in the state of Florida, shared with Henry the fate of having his death sentence commuted. Florida is, of course, a state that is also overly zealous in its application of the death penalty. Not zealous enough to execute the likes of Ottis Toole, however. In any event, it's interesting that both of these men had their death sentences set aside in states run by a member of the Bush family.

Its interesting also to take note of the case of the man known as the Railroad Killer, Rafael Resendez-Ramirez. On July 13, 1999, Ramirez was reported to have walked across a bridge from (where else?) Juarez, Mexico into El Paso, Texas and turned himself in. At the time he was wanted for a string of alleged serial killings. Mirroring the circumstances surrounding Henry's final arrest, Ramirez had been taken into custody several weeks prior by the U.S. Border Patrol, only to be promptly released despite his presence on FBI most-wanted lists and the issuing of alerts to the immigration service, and with a nationwide manhunt under way.

Between this detainment and his surrender, four more victims would be felled by Ramirez (who was, strangely enough, born in Matamoros and raised outside of the home by non-family members, according to his mother). Apparently he still had a little work left to complete. Having done so, Ramirez then made the incomprehensible decision to surrender to Texas authorities. Crossing the border into Texas, Ramirez left a country with no death penalty and entered the execution capital of the western world. The Los Angeles Times, in reporting on his surrender, noted that he was "adamant he wanted to surrender to a Texas Ranger," and that "he had not requested an attorney and was cooperating with detectives."

In the same article, it is noted that authorities say Ramirez is "strikingly intelligent. » Strikingly intelligent? Not based on his actions taken on July 13th of last year. But then again, perhaps Ramirez knows something about the Texas criminal justice system that the rest of us do not.



Ottis Toole: « I've been meaning to ask you ... that time when I cooked some of these people? Why'd I do that? »

Henry Lee Lucas: « I think it was just the hands doing it. I know a lot of things we done, in human sight, are impossible to believe. »

Ottis Toole: « When we took 'em out and cut 'em up ... remember one time I said I wanted me some ribs? Did that make me a cannibal? »

Henry Lee Lucas: « You wasn't a cannibal. It's the force of the devil, something forced on us that we can't change. There's no reason denying what we become. We know what we are. »






à suivre PAGE 2


Dernière édition par invitée le Lun 2 Juil 2012 - 19:34, édité 13 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Dim 1 Aoû 2010 - 3:05

PAGE 2





The Myth of the Serial Killer

« At some time I have start(ed) to hear funny voices, like a person calling me, but no one call me. » — Rafael Resendez-Ramirez, in a letter to a reporter in Houston following his surrender to authorities

Most Americans are familiar with what is considered the classic serial killer "profile". This was a notion first put forth by the venerable FBI, which coined the term "serial killer" and pioneered the concept of "profiling", in an alleged attempt to understand the phenomenon of mass murder. In truth, as we shall see, the concept of the serial killer profile was put forth largely to disinform the public.

In the case of Henry Lee Lucas, few if any of the elements of the serial killer profile apply. For instance, serial killers are said to act alone, driven to do so only by their own private demons. So far removed from ordinary human behavior are their actions that they would not, indeed could not, share their private passions with others. In Henry's case, this is a patently false notion. It has been officially acknowledged that Lucas worked with at least one, and at times as many as three accomplices (Toole's pre-teen niece and nephew were frequently brought along to witness - and at times participate in - the crimes of Henry and Ottis).

It is also claimed that serial killers target a particular type of victim, similar in age, gender, race, and other demographic factors. Again, in Henry's case, this simply does not fit the known facts. Henry's victims in fact had little, if anything, in common physically with one another. The victim's ages ranged from children to the elderly. Both genders and all races were also well represented.

It is further claimed that serial killers follow a readily identifiable MO, with the means of obtaining victims and the trajectory of the crime following a well defined pattern. And again, this is clearly not the case with Lucas. Victims were obtained and death inflicted by a variety of means - including bludgeoning, stabbing, strangulation, shooting, and suffocation. Some were killed in their homes, while others were abducted and taken to remote locations. Some were sexually abused, both before and after death, while others were not. Some were cannibalized. Some were left on display - for maximum impact upon their discovery - while others were left so as not to be discovered at all.

In other ways as well, Henry Lee - the consummate serial killer - did not even come close to matching the profile of what he was supposed to be. Strangely though, perhaps the most remarkable aspect of the Henry Lee Lucas story is that it is not actually remarkable at all. In reviewing the case histories of some two dozen other alleged serial killers, it becomes readily apparent that few - if any - fit the supposed profile.

The victims of Resendez-Ramirez, for instance, ranged in age from 21 to 88 years, with a mix of males and females. The cause of death varied as well, with most being bludgeoned, though one was shot in the head, another stabbed, and yet another had a pick-ax buried in her head. Though not readily apparent, all of these weapons used for inflicting death - by both Lucas and Ramirez - had one thing in common: they are what are termed 'weapons of opportunity'. In other words, they are weapons that were acquired at the crime scene immediately before the murders were committed.

Notably, this precisely mirrors the means by which the CIA has historically taught its assassins to kill. A CIA training manual entitled A Study of Assassination advises the would-be killer that « the simplest local tools are often the most efficient means of assassination. A hammer, axe, wrench, screwdriver, fire poker, kitchen knife, lamp stand, or anything hard, heavy and handy will suffice … All such improvised weapons have the important advantage of availability and apparent innocence … the assassin may accidentally be searched before the act and should not carry an incriminating device if any sort of lethal weapon can be improvised at or near the site. »

The Mafia assassination service known as Murder, Inc. - the brainchild of the Lansky/Luciano syndicate, which had extensive connections to U.S. intelligence agencies - had a similar philosophy. As Jay Robert Nash notes in Bloodletters and Bad Men: « Like most of Murder, Inc.’s assassins, Pittsburgh Phil never carried a weapon in case the local police picked him up on suspicion. He would cast about, once he had selected his murder spot, for any tool handy that would do the job. »

(As a brief aside, it should be noted that the man identified above as Pittsburgh Phil, whose real name was Harry Strauss, was credited with killing at least 500 people in this manner from the late 1920's through 1940. This feat should put him at or near the top of any self-respecting serial killer list.)

Henry Lee recounts in The Hand of Death that his training by the cult followed this time-honored tradition. Of course, the venerable FBI assures us that Satanic cults and Satanic crime do not exist in modern day America. To put this in its proper context, however, it is important to remember that this is the very same FBI that during the reign of Murder, Inc. - and for several decades thereafter - refused to acknowledge the existence of organized crime in America. It is also the same FBI that for years ignored the resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan.

(The Klan, it should be noted, began as an occult based group formed just after the close of the Civil War by an alliance of Confederate Generals and intelligence operatives. The cult's original charter was drafted by General Albert Pike, who had served as the chief of Confederate Intelligence. The point of this digression is that the intelligence community has a long history of spawning occult based groups dedicated to terrorizing society.)

A number of America's other notable serial killers showed a proclivity for utilizing weapons of opportunity as well. The other serial killing Ramirez - Los Angeles' famed Night Stalker - is a case in point. In the majority of the murders attributed to that Ramirez, the victims (who ranged in age from six to eighty-four and were of various races and genders) were stabbed, bludgeoned, slashed, strangled, or electrocuted with weapons acquired at the crime scene. And strangely enough, some were intentionally left alive, as was the case with Resendez-Ramirez as well.

Florida serial killer Bobby Joe Long also showed a preference for inflicting death by a variety of means (shooting, strangling, stabbing), often with weapons of opportunity, and also left some of his victims alive. So too did Ted Bundy, whose most notorious alleged crime - the bludgeoning of four women in the Chi Omega sorority house, was committed with a club acquired on the grounds of the house immediately before his entry. This crime, by the way, was in marked contrast to Bundy's previous alleged murders, which involved but a single victim. Bundy's final murder before his incarceration, the killing of a twelve year old girl, also did not match his supposed MO as put forth by FBI profilers.

As previously stated, this is the rule rather than the exception. Arthur Shawcross, dubbed the Genesee River Killer, also showed no consistency in the targeting of victims. Males and females, young and old, black and white - all were represented on the victim's list of Shawcross. And this pattern, or non-pattern, is evident in the tales of numerous other serial killers:

Charles Ng and Leonard Lake: authorities recovered the remains of seven men, three women, and two babies from their Northern California compound. The causes of death were impossible to determine.

Jeffrey Dahmer: his victims, while all young men, included whites, blacks, Asians, Hispanics and American Indians.

The Hillside Stranglers (Angelo Buono and Kenneth Bianchi): all victims were women, but the cause of death varied, including electrocution, strangulation, lethal injections, and lethal gas (all methods that have been used, strangely enough, to perform judicial executions).

Richard Speck: his eight alleged victims died by a variety of means, including strangulation, stabbing, slashing of the throat and breaking of the neck, all in a single evening.

The Gainesville Ripper (Danny Rolling): his victims included both men and women from various age groups.

The Boston Strangler (Albert DeSalvo): his victims represented a range of ages, races and attractiveness. Though most were strangled, either with materials acquired at the crime scene or manually, some were stabbed, mutilated and/or sexually molested as well. Most were left on display, though one was discretely covered with a blanket.

The Vampire of Sacramento (Richard Chase): his victim's ages ranged from 20 months to 51 years, both males and females. Causes of death included shootings, stabbings and bludgeonings, with some victims left mutilated, beheaded and/or disemboweled. Some were cannibalized as well.

The Coed Killer (Edmund Kemper): all victims were female, though of various ages and races. Death was inflicted by means of stabbing, strangulation, suffocation, shooting and bludgeoning.

Herbert Mullin: his victims, both male and female, varied in age from children to the middle-aged. Weapons of choice included guns, knives and blunt instruments.

The Manson Family: victims, again both males and females, ranged in age from teen-aged Steven Parent to middle-aged Leno LaBianca. Death came by way of shootings, stabbings and bludgeonings, or a combination of these.

Clearly then there are any number of serial killer cases in which there is no defining Modus Operandi, and in which the deceased don't fit any kind of "victim profile". But what of the notion of the serial killer as a lone predator? Was Henry and Ottis' partnership an aberration? Not at all. There are any number of serial killer cases where it is officially acknowledged that there was more than one perpetrator. The Manson Family, of course, is probably the most well known case of multiple perpetrator 'serial killing.' Less well known is the case of the "Ripper Crew" in Chicago in the early 1980's.

Described by authorities as a four-man Satanic cult, the Rippers - led by charismatic Robin Gecht - killed as many as 17 women in as many months. There could well have been more than four members of this particular murderous cult, however. A few days after the four were arrested, another ritually mutilated body showed up at a location where previous bodies had been left by the Rippers.

Then there is the case of Charles Ng. Though Ng was the only one to stand trial for his series of killings, it is acknowledged that the crimes were committed with the assistance of Leonard Lake, who committed suicide upon his arrest. And evidence strongly suggests that there were others involved as well. Lake's ex-wife was almost certainly involved. Police were well aware that at the very least, she had tampered with - and removed evidence from - the crime scene, including twelve videotapes believed to be snuff films of the murders. And a diary seized by police with a detailed plan to construct a series of bunkers outfitted with supplies, weapons, and sex slaves strongly hinted that there was more than just two individuals involved.

Many other serial killers have worked in pairs as well, such as the Hillside Strangler team of Kenneth Bianchi and Angelo Buono. Working the same Los Angeles area turf just one year after the Stranglers were stopped was the team of Roy Norris and Lawrence 'Pliers' Bittaker. And a few years after they were caught, the team of Douglas Clark and Carol Bundy would be working the very same L.A. streets in a series of killings dubbed the 'Sunset Strip Murders.'

The year after they were caught, another serial killer took over the L.A. market - Richard Ramirez, the notorious 'Night Stalker.' According to numerous witnesses - who placed Ramirez back in his home state of Texas at the time of some of the killings - these murders were not the work of a single killer either. Other evidence as well - such as the fact that more than one gun was used in the killings - tends to point to multiple perpetrators.

Then there is the matter of the "Son of Sam" killings in New York. Though most of the literature available paints Berkowitz as the proverbial lone serial killer, Maury Terry and others have presented a compelling case that the killings were in fact the work of multiple cult members. In other serial killer cases as well, evidence pointing to multiple assailants is ignored or explained away with unlikely scenarios.

The body of one of Bobby Joe Long's victims, for instance, yielded semen showing both A and B blood types, indicating at least two perpetrators. A later victim also yielded semen evidence which did not match that obtained from the previous victim. And none of the samples proved to match the samples taken from their alleged killer.

There has long been speculation that the work of the 'Boston Strangler,' officially deemed to be Albert DeSalvo, was not the work of one man. Most of the officials involved in the investigation, in fact, never believed that a single killer was responsible. Of the eight members of the psychiatric panel convened to develop a 'profile,' seven believed that there were at least two perpetrators.

Even in those cases that seem to come closest to matching the classic serial killer profile, such as John Wayne Gacy and Jeffrey Dahmer, there is a compelling case to be made that there were others involved. That evidence will be examined in the next installment of this series. Here we will examine the cases of two high-profile alleged serial killers/mass murderers who were said to be acting alone. The first is a very recent case, that of Yosemite killer Cary Stayner. The other dates all the way back to 1966, the year Richard Speck allegedly went berserk in a home filled with young nursing students in Chicago, becoming the first mass murderer of the television age.

« It's more of a shadow than anything else. You know it's a human being, but yet you can't accept it. The killin' itself, it's like say, you're walkin' down the road. Half of me will go this way and the other half goes that way. The right-hand side didn't know what the left-hand side was going to do. » — Henry Lee Lucas, describing how he perceived his victims prior to killing them.

In February of 1999, a forty-three year old woman and two teenage girls (one her daughter) were brutally murdered while visiting Yosemite National Park in California. Police originally suspected a group of men and women with extensive criminal records who were known members of a drug trafficking ring.

At least eleven members of this group were at one time suspected of complicity in the women's deaths. The group was based in Modesto, where one of the victim's billfolds incongruously showed up some time after the murders. One member of the group worked at the hotel/restaurant from where the women disappeared. Another had in her possession the victim's bank account number and ATM password. Yet another made incriminating statements to police and was discovered to have blanket fluff in his vehicle that matched the fibers recovered from one of the victims.

Investigators were building a substantial case against the group - who were being held in custody on unrelated charges - when a fourth victim was discovered in Yosemite. Two days later it was declared that a handyman at the hotel taken into custody, Cary Stayner, was solely responsible for all four murders. Unexplained, then or now, was the evidence that earlier had pointed in the direction of others.

Many of those involved in the case harbor serious doubts that Stayner acting alone could have committed these crimes. Apart from the physical evidence and testimony implicating others, the story concocted to explain how these murders were the work of a single individual is questionable at best. A good number of police and FBI agents assigned to the case believed from the beginning that more than one perpetrator was responsible, based on the physical implausibility of a single assailant. Many doubt that one man acting alone could have gotten the jump, so to speak, on three able-bodied women and bound them all.

They also doubt that one man could have carried the three bodies out to his car undetected, with one still alive and most likely resisting the killer's efforts, aware that her friend and mother had both already been killed. According to the official story though, that is exactly what happened. Stayner then allegedly single-handedly cleaned up the hotel room in which the first two murders occurred before driving for miles to kill the third victim and dump the body. The killer then supposedly drove many more miles to another location to abandon the car, with the other two bodies still in the trunk.

Stayner is next said to have taken a cab back to Yosemite Valley, though he would most likely have been covered in blood at the time. Two days later, he is said to have returned to the car in yet another vehicle and at that time to have set it afire, still with the two bodies inside. After this, he allegedly drove to Modesto to dump the billfold, though why he didn't destroy it in the car fire along with the rest of the evidence is anyone's guess.

Even with this rather convoluted story, authorities have not been able to explain away all of the incongruous evidence. For example, a taunting letter sent by the killer revealing the location of one of the bodies was sealed with saliva that was not that of Stayner. The FBI reluctantly acknowledged that DNA tests had verified that fact. Spokesmen for the Bureau had an explanation, however: their theory was that Stayner had « tricked an unsuspecting male » into supplying the saliva to seal the envelope. How exactly this would be done was left to the imagination. As was why it would be done. If Stayner had the foresight to not want to leave incriminating evidence on the letter and envelope, why not just use ordinary old tap water? It's been known to do the job.

If the available evidence in the Stayner case leaves doubts about the sole guilt of the accused, this is all the more true in the case of the infamous Richard Speck. The official story of what happened to those eight student nurses in the early morning hours of July 14, 1966 is, in a word, preposterous. If veteran criminal investigators are puzzled as to how Stayner was able to subdue three women, then it boggles the imagination how one man was able to single-handedly subdue nine women, bind them all, and then systematically kill all but one of them.

According to the sole survivor, Cora Amurao, it was she who answered the door that night, allowing Speck entry into the home. She claimed he was brandishing a gun, though none of the victims were shot that night and no evidence was ever found indicating that a gun was used at the crime scene. It was claimed that Speck stole the gun from a rape victim on the very day of the slaughter, after which it promptly disappeared.

Speck quickly corralled Amurao and the five other women in the house into a room, where he proceeded to tear up a sheet into strips and tie the women up, one by one. How he was able to accomplish this while keeping all the rest at bay is anyone's guess. Three more women would arrive home that evening and would likewise be subdued and bound by Speck.

Meanwhile, Speck began dragging the women off one at a time and slaughtering them, taking twenty minutes or more with each victim. As he finished with each, according to Amurao, he would wash up and then return for another. This scene played itself out over the course of at least three hours. During this time, the women awaiting their turn tried to hide under the beds, hoping to elude their assailant. They were, of course, found and killed. All, that is, except Cora Amurao who claims she avoided detection by Speck. The suggestion was made that Speck had lost count of his victims and had falsely concluded that all the girls were dead, thereby making the crucial error of leaving a living witness.

This part of the story is problematic in a number of ways. The first question raised is why did the girls remain in the room in which they were bound? If, despite their bindings, they were able to move about within the room - which they clearly were or they would not have been able to get under the beds - then why not leave the room altogether? And once out of the room, why not get completely out of the house? And what was to prevent the women from untying each other?

After all, the pattern was set early on. After the first couple of slayings, it had to be abundantly clear to the women that their lives were about to come to an abrupt end. It also had to be quite clear that there would be twenty minutes to kill (no pun intended) before the killer returned, more than enough time to attempt an escape. And what was there to lose? It is inconceivable that these women would have remained to await their turn with Speck.

And what of the survivor? It should be readily apparent to anyone that an adult human simply cannot successfully hide underneath a bed. This is amply illustrated by the fact that all but one of those attempting to do so were discovered. And yet one survived. How is it possible that Speck could have searched under the beds to locate the others, and yet failed to see Cora Amurao lying there as well. And is it really possible that Speck was unable to count to nine, especially considering that the stakes were exceedingly high?

Clearly if not for the existence of the survivor, the police would have immediately assumed multiple perpetrators. No theorizing was necessary, however, as the witness was on the scene to provide the unlikely scenario that would be refined to become the official story. Even so, the composite drawing of the suspect released by police clearly did not resemble Speck.

Since the entire trial of the man fingered by Amurao hinged on her eyewitness testimony - and little else - this star witness was zealously protected. She was kept incommunicado and prepped extensively for months for the testimony that she was to deliver, but not before she had identified the suspect in a most unusual manner. While Speck was recovering in the hospital from a failed suicide attempt, Amurao was allegedly sent in dressed as a nurse to observe the suspect. From this encounter, she positively identified him as the killer.

Leaving aside the obvious fact that this was a blatantly illegitimate means of identifying a suspect - which would have invalidated any subsequent attempts by Ms. Amurao to pick Speck out of a police line-up - the real question here is: in what alternative reality would this ever actually happen? What caliber of police official would send a severely traumatized crime victim - who just days before had witnessed the slaughter of eight of her friends and experienced the sheer terror of knowing that she could well be next - into a room unprotected to face the man who had put her through such torture? And what victim would be able to do so, with the memories so fresh? And what guarantee was there that Speck would not recognize his accuser, given that hers was the first face he had seen as he entered the house that night?

At any rate, this was just a warm-up exercise for what was to come. When the time came for Amurao to deliver her critical testimony, she delivered a bravura performance. She recited a meticulously rehearsed version of the events of July 14, and when the time came to identify the suspect in court, she played her trump card. Rising from her seat - allegedly without prompting or rehearsal - she calmly stepped out of the witness box, walked casually over to where Speck sat, stood directly in front of him while looking him in the eye, and told the court: « This is the man. » That was the clincher; Speck was found guilty and sentenced to death.

There are indications though that this was not a foregone conclusion. Prosecutors clearly had doubts about their ridiculously shaky case. One indication of this is the remarkable fact that, though the case was moved some three hours outside of Chicago to Peoria, the judge stayed on in the new venue, an unprecedented development. This same judge slapped a gag order on the press, guaranteeing that no news would get back to Chicago - or anywhere else in the country for that matter. Coupled with the blocking of any interviews with Amurao, this action shut the public out from ever learning the weakness of the case against Speck.

But no matter. Authorities and the press had already assured everyone that Speck was guilty. And the public was hungry for a culprit to hang this heinous crime on. Speck would do just fine. But many of the more thoughtful citizens of Chicago are still waiting to learn what really happened in that house on that fateful night.

The most likely explanation? The "survivor" and star witness was not actually a survivor at all. She was quite possibly an accomplice to a cult of individuals who perpetrated this slaughter. She was, as they say, the inside man. And it was not likely an accident that she was left alive. It was absolutely essential that she remain alive to sell the single assailant scenario and thereby derail an investigation before it ever began.

After all, authorities had noted from the beginning that the house was not highly visible and had immediately assumed familiarity of the killer with the surroundings. Speck did not have this familiarity, though Amurao certainly did. And it is likely not a coincidence that Amurao admitted to being the one to let the killer (or killers) into the house, while ironically becoming the sole survivor.

And what of Speck? He was likely little more than a patsy or fall guy. He may have had some involvement with the killings, though he certainly was not the sole assailant. And he might not have been in the house at all that night. He had no memory of ever leaving the bar that he had been drinking in earlier that evening, though he did remember receiving an injection from a man he didn't know that was supposed to contain speed.

It's possible that, like David Berkowitz, he may have taken the fall to protect the rest of the clan. This would certainly explain the preposterously lax treatment of Speck during his confinement. Or maybe you didn't catch that little home videotape - produced circa 1988 - that depicted Speck snorting huge piles of cocaine and flashing rolls of money (not to mention sporting a rather large and quite unattractive pair of breasts).

How it is possible that one of America's most notorious killers, while residing in what is reputedly one of the toughest prisons in the country, was able to obtain copious quantities of drugs and money and gain access to video equipment and hormone treatments has never been explained. It could be that Speck was rewarded in prison for being such a stand-up guy and taking the fall. Or it could be, as the right-wing law-and-order crowd would have you believe, that this is yet another indication of how America coddles its criminals.

If you choose this explanation, however, you might consider explaining that fact to the hundreds of thousands of non-violent offenders rotting away in jails and prisons all across this country, many serving longer sentences than some of America's serial killers have served. And you might also ponder why it was that Speck's death sentence was overturned on appeal, leaving him eligible for parole in just ten years.

Footnote: A couple weeks after the Chicago slaughter, Charles Whitman - a former marine who had received training by the Naval Enlisted Science Education Program (NESEP), an intelligence entity - would climb the tower at the University of Texas carrying three rifles, three handguns and a shotgun, and proceed to open fire, killing sixteen. Whitman would leave a note which read, in part, « I don't quite understand what is compelling me to type this note. I have been to a psychiatrist. I have been having fears and violent impulses. »

Both of these mass murders occurred, strangely enough, just a few months after Anton LaVey had formally established the Church of Satan and declared April 30, 1966 to be the first day of the Age of Satan. Just a few weeks prior to that, long-time CIA asset Henry Luce's venerable Time magazine had asked its readers the symbolic question: « Is God Dead? » The face of a particularly brutal criminal enterprise, masquerading as a religion, was beginning to emerge from the shadows.



« I must have done it, if everybody says I did. » — Richard Speck




Seven Degrees of Henry Lee


« Can I tell you who really I am, with all the secrecy that's in the family? ... I only have one purpose in life, and that's to express some of my views and some of the views that I have been instructed - anything that can put down Christianity, anything that can put down democracy, anything that can put down freedom. » — Rafael Resendez-Ramirez, delivering his closing argument to a jury in St. Louis, March 1989.

Henry's reign of terror had been ended for a mere nine months when another series of violent "serial killings" began on March 27, 1984 in part of Henry's old stomping ground, the state of Florida (where Resendez-Ramirez also confessed to having committed two murders). By the time it was over, ten people had met with a gruesome death, allegedly at the hands of Bobby Joe Long. Though rarely mentioned in press accounts of the killings, Long is a distant cousin of Henry Lee Lucas.

It had been just over two years since John Wayne Gacy had been indicted for the murder of thirty-three young men in Chicago when the first of a 'new' wave of 'serial killings' began terrorizing the people of the Windy City. A year-and-a-half later, seventeen young women had fallen victim to the 'Ripper Crew,' led by Robin Gecht. Though infrequently mentioned, Gecht had been one of the young male employees of John Gacy. Seventeen years later, just days prior to the scheduled execution of one of the 'Rippers', David Gecht - son of Robin - would be arrested along with three accomplices and charged with committing an act of murder.

The odds that it is merely coincidence that two serial killers worked side by side without either having awareness of - or involvement in - the other's killings are surely astronomical. More likely is that Gecht was a member of a cult led by Gacy and was indeed involved in the earlier series of killings. Well documented is that Gacy surrounded himself with young men and boys, one of whom was Robin Gecht.

Also documented is that Gacy had these boys excavate the twenty-nine graves located directly beneath his house. While it is claimed that the boys were unaware that what they were digging were graves, how credible is this claim? The stench of death permeating the space beneath Gacy's house - and indeed the house itself - was universally described as overwhelming.

It seems entirely possible that those digging the graves - and likely burying the bodies as well - were teen cultists led by Gacy himself. The home was likely used as something of a safe house for the cult, as well as a body drop. Following the arrest of Gacy, the group - now under the leadership of Gecht - was likely forced to take its activities out onto the streets, so to speak.

The change in gender of the victims could be due to one of two factors: a deliberate attempt to disassociate the Ripper killings from the Gacy killings; or simply a reflection of the difference in sexual preference between Gacy and Gecht. At any rate, it is an acknowledged fact that the Ripper Crew was a Satanic cult that killed as a group, much as did the Manson Family. Prosecutors in fact likened Gecht's followers to the Family, who yearned to please their leader and killed on command.

As mentioned in Part 1 of this series, the string of shootings dubbed the 'Son of Sam' murders were not - as is generally believed - the work of David Berkowitz acting alone, but were likewise the work of a Satanic cult (this case has been exhaustively researched by Maury Terry and documented in his book, The Ultimate Evil). An offshoot of the Process Church of the Final Judgment, the cult has been referred to as both the 'Chingon' cult and the 'Four-P' cult.

The Process Church, which set up shop in San Francisco, was itself an offshoot of the Church of Scientology, which was the brainchild of L. Ron Hubbard - an agent of the Office of Naval Intelligence and the son of a U.S. Navy Commander. Before being inspired to create his own church, Hubbard was a close associate and follower of Jack Parsons, rocket fuel scientist and avid follower of the occult, who helped found the prestigious Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California.

Parsons was at the time the head of the American chapter of the OTO (Ordo Templi Orientis), a title bestowed on him by mentor Aleister Crowley, a flamboyant occultist, British and American intelligence asset, and avid Nazi sympathizer and propagandist both before and during World War II.

Crowley had assumed the leadership of the OTO in 1922 when founder Theodor Reuss - a German occultist and intelligence asset - had stepped down. The OTO then - along with the various organizations spawned from it - is in a direct line of descent from the German occult-based secret societies that gave rise to the Third Reich, a fact made evident by the ideology and symbolism of the Process Church, whose logo is a modified swastika.

Back in the Bay area, Anton Szandor LaVey and Crowley - enthusiast Kenneth Anger would set about busily organizing the Church of Satan in San Francisco, where LaVey would become something of a celebrity - the clown prince of Satanism. From this church would spring forth both the Temple of Set - led by U.S. intelligence asset and psychological warfare specialist Lt. Col. Michael Aquino - and the Werewolf Order, founded by LaVey's daughter Zeena and Manson-admirer Nikolas Schreck

Both of these off-shoots embraced an unabashedly fascist ideology. The Werewolf Order was patterned directly after the Nazi-front Werewolf Corps created in post-war Germany to thwart any attempts at denazification. Zeena LaVey and Nikolas Schreck are also notable for holding a public gathering on August 8, 1988 to celebrate the anniversary of the slaughter of Sharon Tate by the Manson Family.

So great is Aquino's admiration for Nazi Germany that he once paid a visit to Wewelsberg Castle - a Satanic holy ground owing to the fact that the castle was lavishly restored by Heinrich Himmler to serve as the headquarters of the Black Order of the SS - to perform a Satanic 'working.' Interestingly, Aquino considers himself to be a homunculus (a being created by magic), the result of a 'working' performed by Jack Parsons and L. Ron Hubbard.

Aquino, who before splitting with the group was the highest ranking member of the Church of Satan other than LaVey, has said that LaVey secretly forged an alliance with the National Renaissance Party, an overtly racist, neo-Nazi organization. This is not difficult to believe, given that LaVey's writings can best be characterized as 'religious fascism.'

From this primordial stew would arise, in the late sixties, the Manson Family. Much of Manson's ideology was taken directly from the teachings of the Process Church, with whom Charlie was closely connected, as alluded to by Bugliosi in Helter Skelter, and greatly elaborated on by Ed Sanders in The Family (to verify that both Satanic and Nazi imagery and philosophy are integral to the teachings of the Family, pay a visit to the official Family web site, maintained for Charlie by long-time disciple Sandra Good).

Sanders links Manson as well to the Church of Satan and the OTO, as well as the Church of Scientology (as was true of Berkowitz as well). All of these connections are quite well documented in Terry's and Sanders' books. For instance, two of the Manson family members convicted of murder were recruited directly from LaVey's Church of Satan: Susan "Sexy Sadie" Atkins and Bobby "Cupid" Beausoleil, who is said to be a former lover and roommate of Kenneth Anger.

LaVey in fact provides one of many connections between killers and victims. He had formed a close association with Roman Polanski shortly before the murders, when he served as the technical consultant for Polanski on his film Rosemary's Baby, in which he also made a cameo appearance as - who else? - Satan. Newspaper accounts at the time of the slayings were rife with claims that the Polanskis were Satanists who hosted drug and sex orgies. But here I digress.

The point is that the Manson Family had numerous affiliations with an array of Satanic groups. In fact, Terry's evidence indicates that the Family was (and is) a Satanic cult itself, a faction of the Process-spawned Chingon cult and a sister group to the New York chapter responsible for the Son of Sam slayings. The Family was, appropriately enough, deeply involved in drug trafficking, as Henry Lee Lucas claimed his cult to be. It's likely not a coincidence that Ottis Toole was known to have paid visits to the Process Church headquarters in New Orleans.

Further evidence presented by Terry indicates that another sister group was in operation in the sixties and seventies in the San Francisco/Santa Cruz area, with this interlocking network quite possibly responsible for the Zodiac murders as well. With all this in mind, we now turn our attention to the Santa Cruz area and the explosion of violent murders that belched forth from that cauldron.

In March of 1967, Charles Milles Manson was released from prison and given transport to San Francisco, where - despite having served virtually his entire adult life in prison - he immediately started gathering followers, many recruited from the various Satanic groups blossoming in the area. In the Spring of the following year, 1968, Manson loaded his new followers into a bus and took them on the road, ultimately settling into the Los Angeles area where he quickly and improbably established numerous prominent contacts in the entertainment business.

In December of 1968, what was thought to be the first of the Zodiac murders rocked the San Francisco area (it would later be learned that the killings actually began in the Los Angeles area on October 30, 1966, shortly after the rampages of Richard Speck and Charles Whitman). Others would soon follow. On August 9th and 10th of 1969, the Manson Family committed two of the most notorious multiple murders in the nation's history - the Tate-LaBianca slayings - victims of which included Sharon Tate, the daughter of Colonel Paul Tate of U.S. Army Intelligence.

Meanwhile, elsewhere in the country, a man named Stanley Baker was convicted in July of 1970 for the murder of a Montana resident. Baker candidly admitted to his arresting officers that he had a little problem - he was a cannibal. As proof, he produced from his pocket a well-gnawed human finger. Baker, as it turns out, liked to talk and candidly admitted his involvement in numerous other murders that he claimed to have committed as a member of the aforementioned Four-P cult. In fact, police were able to conclusively link him to a particularly brutal mutilation murder in San Francisco, thanks to his having thoughtfully left behind a bloody fingerprint. California courts nevertheless declined to prosecute Baker for the homicide with the ridiculous claim that he had been denied a speedy trial.

Despite his confessed involvement in a number of murders, and despite the fact that the murder he was convicted of involved him ripping out the man's heart and eating it, Baker was released from prison after just fourteen years and remains at large today. This was perhaps due to the fact that he had distinguished himself as a model prisoner during his incarceration by starting his own Satanic cult and having no fewer than eleven weapons confiscated by guards (the theme of inexplicably lenient treatment by the criminal 'justice' system, already mentioned in conjunction with Henry Lee, will be more fully explored later).

Just months after the conviction of Baker - in a case closely mirroring the slaughter of the residents of the Tate house - John Lindley Frazier, allegedly acting alone, killed all the occupants of a home in Santa Cruz, including a prominent doctor, his wife, secretary, and two children. As a grand finale, he threw the bodies in the pool (largely cleansing them of forensic evidence) and then lit the house on fire. Frazier, who was known to have a strong interest in the occult, was said to have started his own lifestyle as an Aquarian Age hermit, living in a six-foot-square shack in the woods (can you say Ted Kaczynski - who was, by the way, a subject of MK-ULTRA experiments while a student at Harvard).

Not long after Frazier's rampage, and while the death toll of the Zodiac Killer continued to rise, Edmund Kemper began his bloody odyssey through the streets of Santa Cruz, ultimately leaving eight dead before being stopped in early 1973. Most of his victims were beheaded and dissected, as well as being cannibalized and sexually abused after their death. Just five months after Kemper claimed his first victim, Herbert Mullin began a parallel series of killings in (where else?) Santa Cruz.

Mullin also admitted to having a strong interest in the occult, a fact made evident by the nature of the killings attributed to him. His first victim was killed on Friday the 13th, his second on or about Halloween. His third killing was the stabbing of a Catholic priest in his confessional on November 2 - All Souls Day (this may have been a politically motivated hit; the victim, Father Henry Tomei, was a hero of the anti-fascist French resistance movement during World War II).

All told, Mullin would be credited with thirteen killings in just four months before being stopped in February of 1973. While awaiting trial on the charges, he was assigned a cell adjoining none other than Ed Kemper. The two were, inexplicably, represented by the same defense attorney - James Jackson - who had not long before represented fellow Santa Cruz mass murderer John Frazier. Even more inexplicably, all three were 'examined' after their arrest by psychiatrist Donald Lunde, who appeared as a witness in all three trials. Apparently, there aren't many defense attorneys or psychiatric witnesses available in Santa Cruz (Mullin attempted to refuse the services of attorney Jackson, but the judge denied his request).

For those who have lost count, that makes six serial killers/mass murderers - Charles Manson, Stanley Baker, John Lindley Frazier, Edmund Kemper, Herbert Mullin, and the Zodiac - all spawned from the Santa Cruz/San Francisco area in a span of just over four years, a rather remarkable geographic anomaly that has never been addressed. These killers were part of the dawn of a new era that would see serial killers become an ever-present part of the American culture.

Prior to 1960, fewer than two serial killers a year were reported nationwide. By 1970, the number had climbed to six per year, and by 1980 had tripled that figure. By 1990, nearly three dozen serial killers a year were being reported. Not surprisingly then, the rash of Satanic murders afflicting California would continue. In 1977, not far from San Francisco, another serial killer began a string of killings.

Richard Chase, dubbed the Vampire of Sacramento, would soon stand accused of six homicides that were laced with Satanic symbolism, including the ritual mutilation of the left breast of one of his female victims and the drinking of his victim's blood (this preoccupation with the left breast of victims was shared by the Ripper Crew, who routinely severed and cannibalized the left breast of their victims. In the Boston Strangler case, one of the victims was found with 18 stab wounds forming a design on her left breast. And Resendez-Ramirez, aside from his killings in the U.S., is suspected in the ritual murders of as many as 187 women in Juarez, Mexico - many of whom had their left breast severed).

Yet another Satanic serial killer was to terrorize California in 1984, the highly publicized Night Stalker - Richard Ramirez. Ramirez's involvement in Satanism was so flagrant that it was impossible for the press to ignore. He was routinely referred to as a "self-styled Satanist", however, which is clearly not the case. In truth, Ramirez was connected to at least one high-profile Satanic church, and likely to a covert cult as well.

Ramirez was first introduced to Satanism at a young age by his older cousin Mike in - of all places - El Paso, Texas (or possibly even earlier by his father, a former policeman in Juarez, Mexico). Mike was a decorated Green Beret who had served as a special forces operative in Vietnam. Chances are that cousin Mike was in fact a Phoenix Program assassin, who clearly relished the opportunity that Vietnam gave him to engage in his bloodlust.

Mike had documented some of his assignments in Vietnam by taking graphic Polaroid photos depicting rape, extreme torture, mutilation, and murder. These he shared with his young cousin Richard. There is reason to believe that Mike also got Richard involved with a cult, which certainly don't seem to be in short supply in the El Paso area.

Richard left El Paso in 1978 and journeyed to California, where he quickly hooked up with LaVey's Church of Satan, where he was honored with a one-on-one meeting with LaVey. It is claimed that he parted company with LaVey's group before his killing spree began, though his interest in Satanism clearly continued, as evidenced by the symbolism attending the Night Stalker crime scenes, including the drawing of pentagrams.

Also described as a 'dabbler' in Satanism was everyone's favorite cannibal, Jeffrey Dahmer. It is likely that Dahmer was much more than just a dabbler, a fact made clear by the detailed plan for constructing a Satanic alter that was found in his apartment, complete with the human skulls he had been collecting. In one of the most bizarre 'coincidences' surrounding America's serial killers, the brother of one of Dahmer's victims was found stabbed to death in March of 1999 - long after Dahmer himself had been murdered - in what was described by police as a ritual sacrifice.

This would tend to indicate that others were involved in Dahmer's murder spree, though it is possible that it was just a coincidence. Given, however, that Satanic crime is said to be so rare in America that it does not in fact exist, one wonders what the odds are of two kids from the same family being murdered under such circumstances. And while we are on the subject of coincidences, what are the odds that the Stayner family would have one son kidnapped as a child and subjected to eight years of torture and sexual abuse, only to have their other son later turn out to be a serial killer? But here again I digress.

Yet another obvious Satanist in the serial killer crowd is the man who was known as the Butcher of Kansas, Bob Berdella. By his own admission, Berdella turned to Satanism after the death of his father when he was still a teen. Among the array of macabre artefacts found in his home and place of business (Bob's Bizarre Bazaar) were numerous items fashioned from human body parts, as well as an abundance of occult literature and a Satanic ritual robe. Another rather curious fact about the Berdella case was that following his conviction, a local millionaire named Dell Dunmire bought all of Berdella's belongings, including the house in which the murders were committed and the entire inventory of his home and business. He proceeded to level the house and then sold the vacant lot.

It is quite possible that these actions were taken to hide evidence of the involvement of others, including possibly himself. It will be recalled that Henry Lee Lucas claimed that the upper echelons of the cult he was involved with included the wealthy and powerful. Berkowitz made the same claims of the Son of Sam cult. Journalist Terry was, in fact, able to document the involvement in the cult of such figures as Cotton Club film producer Roy Radin and wealthy art dealer Andrew Crispo. Crispo actually admitted to being present at a ritual homicide, though he denied participating in the grisly murder. Radin, on the other hand, became a victim of the cult himself.

Another acknowledged Satanist was Leonard Lake, and likely his partner Charles Ng as well. Lake's ex-wife admitted that her former spouse had a long-time affiliation with a San Francisco 'witches coven,' and friends recalled that Lake had often claimed membership in a secret 'death cult.'

Besides the killers listed here who have exhibited an overt interest in Satanism, it is tempting to conclude that any murder that includes such elements as cannibalism, ritual mutilation and necrophilia is Satanically inspired. To do so, however, would reek of Christian fundamentalism with its desire to cast all such evil as the work of the Devil.

We will refrain from doing so here. We will also pause here to note that your erstwhile reporter is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a Christian fundamentalist. In fact, he is not a Christian at all, but rather an atheist. He does not believe in God or Satan, though he does believe that both are concepts that are used by the powerful few to promote an agenda.

He also does not believe that those who are at the top of the food chain on either side of the aisle believe in God or Satan, for that matter. They merely exploit the belief systems of their followers to serve their own ends. The main point here is that readers should not conclude that the actions of these killers is influenced or directed by an entity known as Satan, but by mortal men who manipulate the belief systems of others. I'm glad we cleared that up, but once again I digress.

« Satan gets into people and makes them do things they don't want to. » — Herbert Mullin speaking to a Bible study class.

We turn now to another of the recurrent themes that runs through the serial killer literature: the inexplicably lax treatment afforded America's serial killers - already noted in reference to Henry Lee Lucas, Richard Speck and Stanley Baker. This trend is all the more remarkable in light of the fact that the U.S. has the harshest criminal justice system in the 'free' world.

So leniently have many of our serial killers been treated that it is hard not to conclude that the actions of America's courts and key law enforcement personnel are often deliberately intended to keep these men on the streets. If this is not the case, then it is difficult to imagine what other explanation would suffice to explain these glaring exceptions to the 'Rule of Law.'

John Wayne Gacy, for instance, was convicted in 1968 of violently raping a teenage boy. For this he was sentenced to ten years, but was released after serving just 18 months. Some years later - during the killing years of 1972-1978 - at least two young men would go to the police with stories of being chloroformed by Gacy and being subsequently tortured and violently raped.

Despite Gacy's record for engaging in exactly that type of behavior, the complaints were not believed by the police who failed to take any action. Police did finally take action in December of 1978, searching Gacy's home in response to allegations made by yet another young man. They found drivers licenses and jewellery that appeared to belong to some of the missing boys, copious quantities of drugs, a stained rug, handcuffs, a home-made stock, police badges, a syringe and needles, and rope.

Despite the discovery of this evidence - and the fact that the stench of death literally filled every corner of the house as it rose up through the floor boards from the twenty-nine corpses rotting below - the police decided to take no action at that time and left to « further research the case ». Gacy would not be arrested for eight more days, and then it was on drug charges unconnected to the murders. This triggered a second search of the house though that resulted in the discovery of the bodies.

In between the first and second searches, Gacy actually invited officers into his home for drinks, and yet again they bafflingly failed to notice the unmistakable smell of decomposition. Police also aided Gacy by steadfastly refusing to list any of Gacy's victims as 'missing,' preferring instead to consider them runaways. It was noted during the search, by the way, that Gacy's house was impeccably neat, as was that other infamous death house, Jeffrey Dahmer's Milwaukee apartment.

Dahmer also received rather lax treatment from authorities both before and during his killing spree. In 1989, Dahmer had been convicted on molestation charges, for which he received only probation and one year on a work release program. Even this was too harsh though, and a judge granted him early release after just ten months, despite a letter from the prisoner's own father asking that he be held until he received treatment.

Following his release, his probation officer failed to make a single visit to Dahmer's home, which - like Gacy's - reeked of death and decomposition. This would later become the basis of a lawsuit by survivors of some of Dahmer's victims, who plausibly contended that a single visit by the probation department would have put Dahmer out of business.

Even more baffling is the fact that a 14-year-old boy - naked, bleeding and heavily drugged - was seen fleeing Dahmer's apartment by two women who called the police to report the incident. The police, upon their arrival, chose to believe Dahmer's story of a lover's quarrel, despite the fact that the women were still on the scene and angrily tried to inform the officers that they had seen the terror-stricken boy actively resisting Dahmer's efforts to restrain him, and despite the fact that the boy was clearly underage.

Yet more inexplicable, the police claim to have accompanied the pair back to Dahmer's apartment and to have noticed nothing amiss. This despite the fact that there was at the time a three-day-old corpse on the bed with the attendant smell of death, not to mention an abundance of rather morbid artifacts. Nevertheless, the police left and Dahmer promptly proceeded to kill the boy and rape and disembowel the corpse.

The mother of one of the women who had witnessed the boy fleeing called officers back after reading a newspaper story on a missing boy who closely resembled the naked young man, but her concerns were dismissed. Out of despair, she even contacted the local FBI office, but this was also to no avail. The case was considered closed, even though Dahmer was a convicted child molester who was still on probation, and even though the boy who police returned to the killer that night was the brother of the boy Dahmer had previously been convicted of molesting.

The Night Stalker was another who received notably light sentencing. Convicted of rape while still in high school, he was let off without even receiving probation. And his mentor - cousin Mike - was convicted of shooting his wife in the face, killing her in full view of the 13-year-old future serial killer. He was sent to a mental hospital from which he was released in less than five years. Following his release, he again assumed the role of mentor to Richard.

Then there is the case of Bobby Joe Long, Henry's kin. Accused by his girlfriend of rape and battery, he was convicted of the latter. The verdict was set aside, however, when a judge received a letter from Long and, strangely enough, considered it a valid legal motion for a new trial and granted the prisoner's 'motion.' At his new trial, Long was acquitted despite numerous credible witnesses who testified against him. Between the first and second trials, he was also convicted of sending obscene materials and making obscene phone calls to a twelve-year-old girl. For this, he was sentenced to six month's probation and two days in jail. Later, he was convicted of attempting to abduct a girl at gunpoint and received a $1,500 fine and three years probation.

How much worse can it get, you ask? Consider the case of Gary Heidnik. He was arrested in 1978 when it was discovered that he had a woman chained in his basement. She had been repeatedly tortured and raped. Charged with kidnapping, rape, unlawful restraint and false imprisonment, Heidnik was convicted. He was back out by early 1983. A few years later, six more women would have to endure this same tortuous ordeal. Two of them would not survive.

Or consider the case of Arthur Shawcross. Arthur had gone to Vietnam in 1968, and though records indicate he served as a supply clerk, he returned telling lurid tales of rape, torture, cannibalism, mutilation and dismemberment (can you say Phoenix?). Upon his return, he promptly set fire to a local paper mill and a cheese factory - crimes for which he was sentenced to five years in prison. He served less than two.

A year later, Shawcross raped, strangled, mutilated and cannibalized an eight-year-old girl and a ten-year-old boy. He also admitted returning on several occasions to have sex with the boy's rotting corpse. He received a 25 year sentence for the girl's death, but was never even charged with the boy's murder, despite the fact that he had confessed to the crime and showed investigators where the body lay. Shawcross was released just fifteen years later, resulting in eleven more deaths.

Or consider the case of Edmund Kemper. In 1964, young Ed shot both his grandparents in the head. Placed in the custody of the Youth Authority, Kemper was released after serving just five years for the double murder. Richard Speck was convicted of attacking a girl with a knife and nearly killing her in January 1965, just a year before the Chicago mass murder. He served just five months, despite having been arrested some three dozen times in his life prior to the assault. This was attributed to 'bureaucratic error.'

As the trial was set to begin for Hillside Strangler Angelo Buono, prosecutors moved to dismiss all ten murder charges and drop prosecution altogether of Buono as the Strangler. The judge, to his credit, refused to grant the motion and instructed the prosecutors to proceed with the case. Richard Chase was released from psychiatric confinement in 1976 despite protests from the staff that he was dangerous, due in part to his professed belief that he required the blood of others to survive. His killings began the next year, but not before his being found by the police in the desert naked and covered in blood. In his car nearby were guns and a bucket of human blood.

Albert DeSalvo, purportedly the Boston Strangler, was arrested in 1955 and charged with molesting a nine-year-old girl. The charges were dropped. In the next few years, he was twice arrested for breaking and entering. Both times he received suspended sentences. In 1960, he was again convicted of breaking and entering in conjunction with a series of sexual assaults. He served just eleven months.

And consider finally the cases of Charles Manson and Ted Bundy. The LAPD, arguably the most corrupt police department in the country - though there is certainly no lack of competition - couldn't really be bothered with the wealth of evidence that implicated Family members in the Tate and LaBianca murders. The department refused to acknowledge and examine the glaringly obvious connections between the two murder scenes, thus severely hampering the investigation. They likewise refused to explore the connections between the Gary Hinman murder and the other two more high-profile crimes.

The L.A. Sheriffs had solved the Hinman case, no thanks to the LAPD, and had Bobby Beausoleil in custody and knew of his connections to the Family. They were also well aware of the connections between the three crime scenes. Two motorcycle gang members with close ties to the Family - Al Springer and Danny DeCarlo of the Straight Satans - had given them damning testimony concerning the Family's involvement in all the murders.

When the sheriffs passed this information on to the LAPD, they proceeded to do absolutely nothing. Meanwhile, on September 1, 1969, just a few weeks after the Tate murders, a gun was found and turned in to L.A.'s finest. The gun was a rather rare and unique firearm, and just happened to match the description of the weapon suspected of being used in the murders, right down to the broken handle.





à suivre PAGE 3


Dernière édition par invitée le Lun 2 Juil 2012 - 20:05, édité 9 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Dim 1 Aoû 2010 - 3:09

PAGE 3




Nevertheless, the department tagged and filed away the weapon, where it was promptly forgotten. For months. It took a phone call from the father of the boy who had found the gun to get the department to acknowledge its existence, and even then he was initially told that it had probably been destroyed. It hadn't, and was in fact the weapon used to kill the victims at the Tate house.

Elsewhere, Susan Atkins had been arrested on unrelated charges and was spending some time in the Sybil Brand Institute for Women. While there, she gave detailed confessions of the murders to two fellow inmates. Both of these women tried repeatedly to pass this information along to the LAPD, but were consistently denied permission to do so, despite the fact that one of the women to whom these requests were made was at the time dating one of the Tate case homicide detectives.

In other words, the LAPD had at its disposal the eyewitness accounts of a participant in the crime, the gun used in the crime, the statements of two close associates of the killers directly implicating them in the crime, among other evidence, and yet chose to do nothing for a period of several months.

Ted Bundy, on the other hand, had already been taken into custody when his comedy of errors began. The problem was that, in some kind of surrealistic Keystone Cops scenario, they just couldn't seem to keep him there. In 1975, Bundy was convicted of the kidnapping and assault of Carol DaRonch. For this, he was sentenced to 1-15 years with the possibility of parole, meaning that he likely would have been back on the streets in record time.

Shortly thereafter, Colorado police filed murder charges against Bundy, greatly overdue considering that at least five people - including one of Bundy's college professors and, on more than one occasion, his own fiancee - had given the police Bundy's name in connection with a string of killings being investigated in Seattle and elsewhere. This information was filed away and forgotten for years.

Now awaiting trial for murder, and suspected of numerous other murders, Bundy was granted permission to represent himself. Despite being an obvious security risk, he was allowed to do research in the courthouse library, unattended and unrestrained. Luckily for Ted, the library had an open window. Bundy 'escaped' by jumping out the window and casually walking away to freedom.

Recaptured after nearly a week on the lam, Bundy would 'escape' again just months later. This time he was said to have exited his cell through the ceiling space and crawled into the living quarters of a deputy. He then dropped down from the ceiling and strolled casually out the door. If this is in fact the case, then it must be noted that this is a very peculiar design feature for a prison.

Part 4 of this story will look at further similarities in the stories of America's serial killers.



« Like you have a job, I have a job, he has a job. His job is killing people. That's what he was trained to do. » — Cynthia Haden referring to Richard Ramirez (Miss Haden was a juror in the Ramirez trial, and later established a relationship with the condemned man in an effort to understand what drove a person to commit such crimes.)




Seven More Degrees of Henry Lee


« ... draftees were made to kill dogs and vultures by biting their throats and twisting off their heads, and had to watch as soldiers tortured and killed suspected dissidents - tearing out their fingernails, cutting off their heads, chopping their bodies to pieces and playing with the dismembered arms for fun. » — Noam Chomsky describing a deserter's account of the training received by CIA-backed Salvadoran death squads.

Most Americans have difficulty accepting the idea of the mind controlled killer, whether it be the lone-nut assassin such as Lee Harvey Oswald or Sirhan Sirhan, or whether it be a serial killer like Henry Lee Lucas or Charles Manson. Yet the fact remains that U.S. intelligence services have devoted a considerable amount of time and money to developing just such an individual.

There is not space here to detail all the techniques and methods that have received attention from the CIA and others. The basic methodology was revealed decades ago by George Estabrooks - a prominent psychologist under contract to the intelligence services - in his bookHypnotism, first published in 1943. Estabrooks candidly acknowledged that his « main interest has always been the military application of hypnosis ». While 'Esty' notes that the « intelligent reader ... will sense that much more is withheld than has been told » there is nevertheless enough information given to construct a fairly accurate picture of the fundamentals of mind control.

What is needed is a subject suffering from what used to be termed Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), and what is now termed Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). This condition can already exist within the subject or can be created by the therapist. In all cases, however, the condition is created by severe trauma - so severe in fact that the traumatic episode cannot be integrated into the experiences of the core personality.

Far and away the most common cause of MPD is early childhood abuse, usually inflicted by a parent or other adult guardian. As Dr. Frank Putnam stated in 1989: « I am struck by the quality of extreme sadism that is reported by most MPD victims. Many multiples have told me of being sexually abused by groups of people, of being forced into prostitution by family members, or of being offered as sexual enticement to their mother's boyfriends. After one has worked with a number of MPD patients, it becomes obvious that severe, sustained, and repetitive child abuse is a major element in the creation of MPD. »

When the abuse is of an extreme nature, the natural human reaction is to build a wall around such experiences, so to speak, by creating a separate and distinct personality to deal with future episodes of abuse. Once the core personality is split, it is then possible to control one or more of the alters that have been created, without the conscious knowledge of the main personality. This, according to Estabrooks, creates the "Super Spy", willing to follow orders unquestioningly without even being aware that he is doing so.

Estabrooks only alludes to the severe trauma that is required to create a true multiple, often referring to the trauma euphemistically as a form of hypnotism. At one point, he notes that « [multiple personalities] are caused by a form of hypnotism in the first place! We will see that emotional shock produces exactly the same results as hypnotism. » Later, he comes closer to the grim reality when he states: « multiple personality could be both caused and cured by hypnotism. Remember that war is a grim business. Suppose we deliberately set up that condition of multiple personality to further the ends of military intelligence. »

Elsewhere, Estabrooks acknowledges that he himself had written previously that: « everyone could be thrown into the deepest state of hypnotism by the use of what [I] termed the Russian method - no holds barred, deliberate disintegration of the personality by psychic torture ... The subject might easily be left a mental wreck but war is a grim business. » Also noted is that children make especially good subjects, given that they « are notoriously easy to hypnotize. » Which is to say, children are particularly vulnerable to abuse and have more of a tendency to dissociate traumatic experiences, thereby creating alter identities that can be later exploited and controlled.

This is one of the main reasons that the CIA and other intelligence agencies have played a key role in the creation of 'mainstream' Satanic groups such as the OTO and the Temple of Set, as well as in denying the existence of underground Satanic cults and Satanic crime. These Satanic groups have frequently served as agency fronts for mind-control operations. For when it comes to severely traumatizing children, nothing compares to the stories told by those who have survived what has been termed Satanic Ritual Abuse (sometimes referred to as Sadistic Ritual Abuse). Of course, there has been a concerted effort to discredit all such stories, spearheaded by the False Memory Syndrome Foundation - a group led by a truly vile coalition of CIA affiliated psychologists and accused pedophiles.

Also playing a key role in the movement to deny the validity of recovered memories of severe abuse are Paul and Shirley Eberle, authors of the supposedly authoritative book The Politics of Child Abuse, which attempts to blame all child abuse accusations and prosecutions on overzealous prosecutors, therapists and parents. This might be a little more credible if the Eberles themselves were not well known to Los Angeles police as distributors of child pornography, a fact that the media conveniently and consistently ignore while touting the Eberles as authorities in the field of child abuse.

There is not the time or the space here to review the literature supporting the claims of abuse survivors. Suffice it to say that when viewed in the context of a state-sponsored mind control program, we can begin to understand why someone would inflict such appalling levels of abuse on America's children, and why so much effort and disinformation would be put forth to discredit such claims if they are in fact valid.

By cloaking mind control operations in Satanic rituals, yet another purpose is served as well. Even if an operation is uncovered - as was the case at the McMartin Preschool - the stories told by the children are so outlandish, so far removed from the world as we know it, that they are easily cast aside as the product of a child's fertile imagination. But is it really mere coincidence that the very acts that child survivors of ritual abuse all across the country claim to have witnessed and participated in - cannibalism, bestiality, pedophilia, torture, mutilation, dismemberment, etc. - are the same depraved acts that are the stock-in-trade of America's serial killers?

In the previous installment of this series, the connections between America's serial killers and Satanism were explored. In the next installment of what has become a considerably longer work than was originally intended, we will explore the overlapping area of mind control. Of course, it is rarely possible to substantiate that a given person has indeed been victimized by CIA mind control procedures. There are clues, however, that when taken together tend to point in that direction. Some of these are:

A history of severe childhood abuse.

A diagnosis of Multiple Personality Disorder, or symptoms indicating the presence of the condition.

The reporting of voices in the head instructing the subject what to do.

Connections to the intelligence community.

Connections to military, prison, and/or psychiatric facilities known or suspected to be involved in MK-ULTRA projects.

Before looking at these factors in the last installment of this series, we will look here at some other recurrent themes that tend to indicate that there is more to the average serial killer than meets the eye. Specifically, we will focus on:

The suspicious deaths of key players during the trials of various killers, tending to indicate the complicity of others and/or a high-level cover-up.

The suspicious deaths of the killers themselves.

Actions taken by the accused that seem deliberately intended to circumvent a full airing of the evidence at trial, including the giving of voluntary confessions, the entering of guilty pleas, the failure to mount a defense, and the insistence by the accused that they be allowed to serve as their own attorney (such actions, it should be noted, also provide fertile ground for later appeals and sentencing delays).

During the Manson trial for instance, one of the Family's defense attorneys was murdered, Charlie insisted on the right to defend himself, and the defense stunned the courtroom and legal observers by resting their case without calling a single defense witness to rebut the prosecution's case, virtually guaranteeing an easy win for Bugliosi and the state.

Cary Stayner sealed his fate by giving a detailed confession implicating himself - and he alone - in the four homicide charges he was facing, clearing several others who were - unlike Stayner - linked to the killings by hard physical evidence. On September 6th of this year, Stayner and his attorney accepted the terms of a plea bargain agreement that reeks of a cover-up. Stayner professed his sole guilt in the death of Joie Armstrong and was sentenced to life in prison with no possibility of parole, though he was spared a death sentence.

Besides the fact that the guilty plea eliminated the need for a highly publicized trial, the agreement contained a very unusual provision, stating that: « After the entry of judgment in this case until his death he [Stayner] will not speak to anyone, write to anyone, or communicate to anyone about the death of Joie Ruth Armstrong. » No one, in other words, will ever hear Stayner's side of the story.

Herb Mullin stunned the court and his attorney by attempting to plead guilty to six counts of first-degree murder. The judge refused to accept the plea given the gravity of the consequences. Ed Kemper, another Santa Cruz serial killer, drove all the way to Colorado after his last killing before inexplicably calling his friends on the force back home and turning himself in, whereupon he gave meticulously detailed confessions to eight brutal murders.

Danny Rolling, the Gainesville Ripper, stunned the courtroom hearing his case by entering guilty pleas and taking sole responsibility for five homicides. He was given the death penalty on all five counts. Included among the evidence indicating that Rolling did not act alone was the fact that one of his victims - who was restrained and tortured prior to his death - was a 6'3" tall, 200+ pound athlete who put up a fierce fight for his life. Rolling, acting alone, was simply not physically up to the task.

Bob Berdella was quite obliging to his captors, giving confessions to six torture murders. He then surprised the court by entering a guilty plea to one count of murder arising from those confessions. Berdella served only four years before dying at the young age of 43, officially of a heart attack. Many suspect the true cause was poisoning. Richard Speck also allegedly died of a heart attack at the relatively young age of 49. Richard Chase served just two-and-a-half years of his sentence before he was discovered dead in his cell, allegedly of a drug overdose. Chase was incarcerated in Vacaville - a hot bed of CIA mind control operations - and was reportedly on 'anti-psychotic' medication at the time.

Jeffrey Dahmer proved to be quite cooperative in captivity, giving highly detailed confessions to seventeen murders. In court, he ignored his lawyer's advice and plead guilty but insane to fifteen counts of murder. Dahmer served just two years before being paired with two homicidal inmates on an unsupervised work detail. Only one emerged alive, and it wasn't Dahmer.

Leonard Lake, partner of Charles Ng, popped a cyanide capsule during an interrogation shortly after his arrest for shoplifting, which he conveniently and rather improbably had hidden in the collar of his shirt. He died without ever regaining consciousness. Ng, who served as his own attorney for awhile, somehow managed to place a phone call to a juror during his trial. One man who Ng had confessed to - who was to be a key witness at the trial - died in a single car crash before he could appear.

Ted Bundy, who represented himself three times - in Utah, Colorado and again in Florida - eventually confessed to being solely responsible for twenty-eight murders. John Wayne Gacy obliged his captors by confessing to thirty or more murders, taking sole credit for all of them. The Night Stalker insisted on retaining two grossly inexperienced and ineffective attorneys to represent him, predictably resulting in nineteen death sentences from the jury, whose deliberations were delayed when one of the twelve was killed in her home in a grisly Night Stalker-style slaying. Nothing unusual about that.

Douglas Clark, the Sunset Strip Killer, insisted on defending himself; his request was granted. His partner, Carol Bundy, had a change of heart on the day she was set to go to trial and preempted the proceedings by entering guilty pleas on two counts of murder. But perhaps nowhere was such a concerted effort made to avoid an airing of the truth in open court than in the case of Albert DeSalvo, the purported Boston Strangler. DeSalvo never actually stood trial for the stranglings. No one, in fact, has ever stood trial for the stranglings.

Had DeSalvo stood trial for the killings, he would without question have been acquitted. There was not then, nor has there ever been, a single piece of physical evidence produced tying DeSalvo to any of the slayings. Not a single eyewitness could place DeSalvo at - or anywhere near - any of the crime scenes. This is not to say that there were no eyewitnesses who had seen 'The Strangler.' There were several; none of them could identify DeSalvo as the man they saw.

The public, meanwhile, was clamoring for resolution of the case. Luckily for them, DeSalvo's attorney - F. Lee Bailey - came up with what has to be the most preposterous and unethical defense in the history of American jurisprudence. As Bailey himself has stated: « I wanted the right to defend a man for robbery and assault by proving that he had committed thirteen murders. » In other words, rather than defending his client against the relatively light charges he was actually faced with, Bailey opted to proclaim his client's guilt on those charges, but argued that he should be found innocent by reason of insanity based on the fact that he had also committed thirteen murders. Now that's a hell of a defense.

Bailey didn't bother to cross-examine a single prosecution witness, making no effort whatsoever to rebut the charges DeSalvo was facing. Instead, he presented a ridiculously flimsy case for DeSalvo's guilt in the Strangler killings, a case that would never have stood up to cross examination. This wasn't really a concern though, since when it is the defense attorney presenting the prosecution's case, there isn't anyone to conduct a cross examination.

The end result was that DeSalvo was found guilty of the robbery and assault charges by the jury, and guilty of the murder charges in the court of public opinion - which is of course exactly what was intended. For this shameless selling-out of his client, Bailey should at the very least have been disbarred, if not brought up on criminal charges himself. Instead, he went on to fame and fortune and a most undeserved reputation as a skilled attorney.

DeSalvo, on the other hand, went on to an early death. He was stabbed to death in the prison infirmary the morning after making an urgent call to Dr. Ames Robey, a prison psychiatrist who had spent a considerable amount of time with the prisoner. DeSalvo had told Robey that he wanted to meet with the doctor and a reporter early the next day. Robey recalls what happened next:

« He was going to tell us who the Boston Strangler really was, and what the whole thing was about. He had asked to be placed in the infirmary under special lockup about a week before. Something was going on within the prison, and I think he felt he had to talk quickly. There were people in the prison, including guards, that were not happy with him ... Somebody had to leave an awful lot of doors open, which meant - because there were several guards one would have to go by - there had to be a fair number of people paid or asked to turn their backs or something. But somebody put a knife into Albert DeSalvo's heart sometime between evening check and the morning. »

Bailey had convinced DeSalvo to sign an agreement with author Gerold Frank to pen the disinformational The Boston Strangler. The book, which argued that DeSalvo had indeed been solely responsible for the killings, became a best seller and further reinforced in the public's mind the notion that the killings had been solved. Bailey, by the way, pocketed the advance money that was supposed to go to DeSalvo, prompting Albert to file complaints with the state bar association, though these were ignored.

We conclude this installment with the case of another 'serial killer' that never quite made it to court. Consider the unusual case of one Herb Baumeister of Indianapolis, Indiana. Herb's strange tale stands as a rather blatant example of how the 'serial killer' label is applied as a cover-up for a much larger criminal enterprise.

Herb was the son of a prominent doctor who secreted his young son off to "mental examinations". Shortly after dropping out of college - where he had been an anatomy major - he spent two months in a psychiatric hospital where he was diagnosed as having two or more personalities. As a young man - and a member of the Young Republicans (as was Ted Bundy) - he opened a successful business in conjunction with the Children's Bureau of Indianapolis, which gave him ready access to, naturally enough, children.

Exactly what Herb's business with the children actually was is a matter of conjecture. It was certainly profitable though, allowing Herb to purchase a sprawling, secluded 18.5 acre estate dubbed 'Fox Hollow Farms.' Police would soon discover thousands of human bones, bone fragments and teeth on the heavily wooded estate, many scattered about in plain sight. How many more were buried will probably never be known.

Baumeister was away at a lake with his son when the search of his property began. Two days into the search, police paid a visit to Baumeister at the lake, where they removed his son from his custody. They did not, however, take Baumeister into custody - or even question him. This, mind you, after investigators had just spent two full days excavating Baumeister's eighteen acre graveyard!

Herb promptly disappeared after the police left. He reappeared a few days later in Ontario, where police found him sleeping in his car. The officer on the scene noted that there was a stack of videotapes in the passenger area of the car. The next day, Herb was again found in his car, this time with a .357 magnum bullet hole in his head. The death was ruled a suicide; the tapes were nowhere to be found.

These tapes were believed by investigators to be snuff films of some of the killings. A semi-hidden video camera had been discovered strategically placed at the estate. The tapes were never recovered or accounted for. Around this same time, Baumeister's older brother was found dead in a Texas whirlpool in a case that has never been solved.

What was really going on at Fox Hollow Farms and how many people were involved? That may never be known. No one ever stood trial for the murders, and it was impossible to even estimate a victim count. Herb was declared to be solely responsible for the deaths of the four victims who could be identified, all local gay men reported missing.

These were four of at least ten local men reported missing after frequenting area gay bars over the previous three years, a fact that the police had consistently ignored. With the exception of the local gay press, the media had turned a blind eye as well. After the discovery of Herb's bone-yard, the media disparaged the victims - referring to them as "male prostitutes" - while continuing to routinely laud Baumeister as a local "businessman" and "landowner," rather than what he was - a suspected mass murderer.

It does not seem unreasonable to conclude that many of the bones found on Herb's property could have been those of children acquired from the Bureau who would not be missed and were likely never reported missing. Equally reasonable is the possibility that these children, prior to their ultimate fate as stars of kiddy snuff films, were used for child pornography and/or child prostitution.

Of course we all know that the existence of snuff films is the stuff of urban legends. But there are those persistent reports of a thriving underground market for just such films, a market that is said to include many of wealth and power. Former Nebraska State Senator John DeCamp, for example, gives an appallingly detailed account of one such film in his self-published book, The Franklin Cover-Up.

Ed Sanders concludes in The Family - based on a number of witness statements - that the Manson clan was involved in the production and distribution of snuff films (as well as child pornography). Maury Terry reaches the same conclusion about the Son of Sam cult in his book The Ultimate Evil. And then there is the case of Charles Ng and Leonard Lake.

Their Northern California ranch was tailor-made for the production of snuff films, complete with a bunker containing hidden rooms with one-way viewing windows and hidden cameras. The compound also contained an incinerator for disposing of the bodies - one reason that a final body count was never achieved, though evidence indicated that as many as 25 people were killed and disposed of.

As previously mentioned, Lake's ex-wife managed to get to the compound shortly before police and remove an unknown number of videotapes from the property. Though authorities claim these tapes were later returned, there is no way of verifying that the tapes returned were the same ones that had been removed, or that all were returned.

Even so, an abundance of photographic and video evidence was found to document the reign of terror by the pair. Though the tapes stopped short of showing the actual killings (by most reports, anyway; some have claimed otherwise), many investigators were of the opinion that such tapes did, in fact, exist. For now, though, there is mostly just speculation.

There is no speculation about the existence of still photographs detailing the exploits of serial killers, however. These undeniably exist. Jeffrey Dahmer, for one, had a collection of Polaroids of his handiwork. So, for that matter, did Edmund Kemper, Bob Berdella and - as just noted - Leonard Lake. These would, I'm sure, make a nice addition to the photo album of Richard Ramirez's cousin Mike.



« It's hard for me to believe that a human being could have done what I've done, but I know that I did it. » — Jeffrey Dahmer





The Mind (Control) of a Serial Killer


« I'm going to teach you the beauty of pain and you're going to be my slave for the rest of your life. » - Viola Lucas to her son Henry Lee

When it comes to early childhood abuse, there are few parents of future serial killers who can compare to Viola Lucas. So severe was her physical abuse of young Henry that he once slipped into a coma for a day following a particularly brutal beating. On another occasion - due to a combination of violent abuse and neglect - Henry lost one of his eyes. Sidekick Ottis Toole suffered abuse as well, at the hands of both his father and his grandmother.

Viola was, as is the case with the mothers of several serial killers, a prostitute. She routinely entertained her customers in the presence of Henry, who was compelled to watch. Viola took it one step further, however, dressing young Henry up as a girl and prostituting him out to her customers for them to indulge their depraved pedophile fantasies.

Henry's cousin, Bobby Joe Long, was likewise born the son of a prostitute, and also had to witness his mother's sexual activities throughout his childhood. Until the age of thirteen, young Bobby shared a bed with his mother. Ted Bundy's mother was also an abusive young prostitute who entertained her customers in Ted's presence. Charles Manson was likewise born the son of a teenage prostitute. He suffered abuse throughout his childhood, both at the hands of his mother and in a series of reform schools and penal institutions. From the age of eight, Manson spent the vast majority of his life institutionalized, including a stint in Boy's Town - identified in the aforementioned The Franklin Cover-Up as a hot-bed of pedophilic mind-control activities.

John Wayne Gacy's father was a violently abusive alcoholic, as was Leonard Lake's father and Richard Speck's stepfather (whose name was, strangely enough, Carl August Lindbergh). Danny Rolling's father was abusive as well, while Richard Chase's was said to be a 'strict disciplinarian.' DeSalvo's father was also violently abusive towards young Albert, as was Richard Ramirez's father. Ramirez was also the victim of severe sexual abuse, as was Arthur Shawcross - whose mother was known to rape her son with a broomstick handle. Ken Bianchi was severely abused as a child as well.

Charles Ng's father would routinely chain and beat the young boy, while both of Carol Bundy's parents were abusive. Her mother died suddenly and rather mysteriously at a very young age. Her father, who thereafter sexually abused Carol and her siblings, would later hang himself. Herb Mullin's father, decorated World War II hero Martin William Mullin, liked to entertain his son with graphic war stories, and taught the young man that violence was natural. Herb would later tell anyone who would listen that his father was a mass murderer, responsible for a number of unsolved killings. No one took Herb seriously, of course.

None of this should come as much of a surprise to most readers. That serial killers have suffered an abusive childhood has become almost a cliché. This generally acknowledged fact is mentioned here only because, as previously stated, it is a factor in identifying victims of mind control when considered in conjunction with other characteristics and experiences later in life.

In the dark and ugly nether world where serial killers and mind-control operations bisect, there appears to be two general categories of mass murderers: those who are merely controlled, and those who are both controlling and controlled. There is a third category as well that occupies the gray area between these first two - those killers who are obsessed with the notion of controlling others, but who appear to have fallen short of attaining that goal.

First on the list of what we will call 'controllers' is, of course, Charles Manson. That Charlie had an uncanny ability to control his followers is a well established fact. Yet more remarkable is that Manson has maintained that same level of control from inside a prison cell for thirty years now. In fact, it was that very control that was the sole basis for Manson's murder convictions.

The fact of the matter was that Manson did not personally participate in the Tate/LaBianca murders. He was not even present at the crime scenes when the slayings took place. He merely told his followers what to do, and they robotically followed his commands. In order to convict Manson, it was necessary for the prosecution to convince the jury that the actual killers were virtually powerless to disobey their leader. It was not enough to merely show that Charli had given the order to kill. This does not, by a long shot, constitute first-degree murder.

If I ask you, the reader, to break the law - and you comply - you are the criminal, not I. Following orders is no excuse for breaking the law, and certainly no excuse for committing mass murder (except, apparently, in the military). So in order to garner convictions against Manson, it had to be proven that this was an order that the recipients were incapable of not acting on.

For this reason, the Manson trial had no precedent in American history. What the Manson case demonstrated was that it could be proven in a court of law that a person could be compelled to act against his will. This had already been established by a Danish court in a landmark case recalled by Estabrooks in Hypnotism: « An amateur hypnotist named Nielson had induced an hypnotic subject named Hardrup to commit a murder ... Nielson, the hypnotist, got a life sentence, the maximum penalty in Denmark, whereas Hardrup, the actual murderer, received a two-year sentence on the basis of temporary insanity. »

The Manson case had a slightly different outcome: both the controller and his followers received the death penalty. Legally and logically, this verdict makes no sense. For if Manson's control was so complete that the killers were powerless to resist his commands, then they should not have been held legally responsible for their actions. And if Charlie did not, in fact, wield such power, then he should not have been held responsible for the actions of others.

Bugliosi does not address this inherent contradiction in his prosecution strategy in Helter Skelter. He does ponder, albeit briefly, how Manson gained such control, concluding that this « remains the most puzzling question of all. » Indeed. After spending just a few pages briefly summarizing some of the techniques Manson employed on his followers, Bugliosi surmises: « I tend to think that there is something more, some missing link that enabled him to so rape and bastardize the minds of his followers that they would go against the most ingrained of all commandments, Thou shalt not kill, and willingly, even eagerly, murder at his command. »

While pondering the question of how Manson was able to exert such control, Bugliosi largely overlooks an even more important question: where did Charlie learn the techniques that he was obviously so skilled at? Bugliosi notes only that: « It may be something that he learned from others », which is, of course, only stating the obvious. The question not asked, either in the book or at trial, is: who were these others?

Another question not asked by Bugliosi, nor by any number of CIA affiliated writers who have written on the subject of mind control, is: how is it possible that a man of limited education who has spent the majority of his life in prison acquired these skills, while the intelligence agencies - which have invested countless millions of dollars employing the best and the brightest scientific minds in the country for decades in pursuit of attaining this very same goal - have allegedly met with nothing but failure. The answer is, of course, that it is not possible.

It is unfathomable that men such as Manson (and Jim Jones, David Koresh, etc.) have stumbled upon a secret that the CIA has yet to discover. It is a patently absurd notion. And yet, this is exactly what we are supposed to believe. We are also supposed to believe that Charlie, while controlling others, was himself acting on his own free will.

This is highly unlikely. If Charlie was in fact controlling the Family, the logical question to be asked at trial was: who was controlling Manson? Was Manson himself a puppet, as well as a puppeteer? This question was, naturally, never raised and so remains unanswered to this day. Perhaps Bugliosi felt this question unimportant, given that, according to his book, « The Manson case was, and remains, unique. » This is also an absurd notion.

Illustrative of this is the case of Douglas Clark, the Sunset Strip killer and another controller. Clark's involvement in the intelligence community began at birth, when he was born the son of a Naval Intelligence officer (though the 'CIA' has become something of a generic term for the intelligence community, the ONI - Office of Naval Intelligence - is the oldest and quite possibly the largest and most powerful of the U.S. intelligence entities).

A decade after Doug's birth in 1948, father Franklyn - then a Lt. Commander - allegedly retired from Naval service to join the private sector, a common ploy to provide cover for ongoing intelligence activities. Shortly after, Franklyn relocated eleven-year-old Douglas and the rest of the family to an atoll in the Marshall Islands to take a 'civilian' position with the Transport Company of Texas - an obvious intelligence front.

In the early 1960's, the family returned briefly to the U.S., taking up residence in San Francisco, which was soon to become the home turf of an array of serial killers, as previously noted. The family soon relocated again, this time to India. Around this time, young Douglas began attending Ecolat, the international school in Geneva attended by the son's of UN diplomats, European and Middle Eastern Royalty, and international finance capitalists.

Following his attendance there, Doug next attended the prestigious Culver Military Academy in Indiana, while father Franklyn moved first to Venezuela and then to Australia as he continued to pursue his 'civilian' career. In 1967, Doug himself enlisted in the Air Force, where he was assigned to, not surprisingly, radio intelligence. In short order, Doug was given an early discharge, albeit under honorable conditions and with full military benefits. Clark soon after hooked up with Carol Bundy, who was - as a jury was to later note - just one of several women over whom Clark exhibited a remarkable level of control in the ensuing years.

Clark was not the only man to exert such control over Bundy. Jack Murray - who may well have been involved in at least some of the crimes attributed to the pair, and at the very least had knowledge of the murders that he chose not to act on - also exerted such control over Bundy. He would ultimately become a victim of the pair.

Clark liked to exert his control over children as well, involving an eleven-year-old neighbor girl and the son of another of his girlfriends in sexual activities, and possibly in the killings as well. Bundy's own children suffered sexual abuse at the hands of both Doug and Carol. All told, Clark had a number of women and children to do his bidding, sexually and otherwise. At least one of them eagerly killed for him as well. Clark also claimed to have Mafia connections. In fact, he described one of his early killings as his initiation into a Mafia 'hit group.' In classic Mafia fashion, the victim was found stuffed into the trunk of a Rolls Royce.

Gary Heidnik was yet another 'serial killer' who falls into the controller camp. Heidnik attended the Staunton Military Academy in Virginia, but left after visiting a psychiatrist for reasons which are unclear. He then joined the army and was sent to a West German field hospital where he was prescribed a heavy tranquilizer normally used for the treatment of severely psychotic individuals, though he was not diagnosed as having such a condition. In short order, he was sent back to the U.S., where he was released early from military service on unspecified medical grounds with a full disability pension. In 1971, Heidnik formed his own 'church,' recruiting institutionalized black women who were said to be 'retarded' (which is how Jim Jones began his 'church' as well).

Four years later, Heidnik opened a stock account - allegedly using the money from his meager military pension - which was soon valued at well over a half-million dollars. All the while, Heidnik was in-and-out of a number of mental institutions and made several suicide attempts (as did his brother; their mother succeeded in killing herself with poison). Heidnik eventually had his own mind-control program going in the basement of his house, where he kept six women chained as sex slaves. Heidnik, who was prone to race-war diatribes (a la Charlie Manson), inflicted severe torture on the captive women, resulting in the deaths of two of them, one by electrocution - a favored form of torture.

The women who were not lucky enough to survive were ground up and fed to the still-captive women to supplement the dog food they had previously been receiving. The girls were routinely forced to have sex both with each other and with Heidnik. It is unclear through all this how much control Heidnik ultimately attained over the women. When he was ultimately brought to trial, the defense specifically argued that Heidnik should not be held accountable for his actions due to LSD experiments he had been subjected to during his early 1960's military service in West Germany. The jury, which doubtless had no knowledge of the extent or nature of MK-ULTRA experiments carried out by the military/intelligence sector, discounted this argument. They did not feel that such experimentation could account for Heidnik's actions. They may well have been mistaken.

John Wayne Gacy appears to have been a controller of sorts as well. He also exhibited clear signs of having a multiple personality disorder, although he was not diagnosed as such. Gacy was a widely respected businessman, the JC's Man-of-the-Year, a great neighbor who threw parties for the whole neighborhood, and was well connected and active in Democratic Party politics, at one point meeting and being photographed with First Lady Rosalyn Carter.

On the other hand, he has the distinction of being convicted of more first-degree murder counts than any man in U.S. history. How are we to reconcile these two images of John Gacy? Men such as he are usually said to be sociopaths, lacking any morals or conscience. Their personality that is presented to the public is said to be an act, an emotionless facade. I would argue that it's just as likely, if not more so, that the public self is, in fact, a legitimate personality separate and distinct from the one that does the killing. As Detective David Hackmeister said: « His (Gacy's) personality could change in a split second. » Does this represent the facade slipping, or an alter personality emerging? Or is there any difference? Is a 'sociopath' not, in fact, a person with multiple personalities?

At any rate, Gacy made a habit of surrounding himself with young boys - whether entertaining them as a clown or employing them as a contractor. One of these boys was Ripper Crew leader Robin Gecht, who would later be diagnosed as a multiple himself. His personalities included a small child, a teenager, and a businessman.

Angelo Bouno, of Hillside Strangler fame, was also likely a controller, both of partner Kenneth Bianchi and of the stable of young women and girls that surrounded him. He was known to run a teen prostitution ring, and was said to be a magnet for teenage girls, despite being not a particularly attractive man. Partner Bianchi - who fraudulently set up shop as a psychiatrist himself, renting space from a legitimate therapist - was diagnosed as MPD by as many as five psychiatrists who examined him while in custody, and was said to have frequently lapsed into trance-like states as a child.

The prosecution brought in their own expert to prove that Bianchi's multiple personality disorder was nothing but fakery, which he allegedly succeeded in doing. This might be more convincing though if the 'expert' that denounced the diagnoses had been someone other than Martin Orne, one of the most notorious of the CIA-funded 'spychiatrists' (who was assisted in this case by yet another CIA-funded psychiatrist, Margaret Singer).

Leonard Lake and partner Charles Ng clearly had their sights set on being controllers as well, but fell short of their goals. Their master plan, which they dubbed 'Operation Miranda,' called for a network of bunkers across the country staffed with mind controlled sex slaves. Both had military connections. Lake had gone to Vietnam as a Marine, completing his first tour and beginning a second. This was cut short, however, when he was deemed to be suffering from « unspecified medical problems. » Back in the states, he was discharged on medical grounds and entered a VA hospital for « psychological problems. » Partner Ng was a former Marine as well, and their compound was stocked with an amazing array of weapons and military equipment, in addition to the snuff-film studio and incinerator.

Another notable wanna be was Jeffrey Dahmer. He had joined the army in 1979 but was, alas, discharged early. Jeff was obsessed with gaining control over his victims. His preferred means of doing so - and of disposing of the bodies accumulating from his failed experiments - was with chemicals, likely a skill acquired from his father, Lionel Dahmer, Ph.D.., a prominent research chemist. Dahmer was working on perfecting a home lobotomy technique, which consisted of drilling a hole in the forehead and then adding various chemicals. Other chemicals were used to dissolve the three corpses found in a 55 gallon acid vat that Dahmer inexplicably got into his apartment.

Dahmer was likely afflicted with MPD as well. He was universally described as a normal sounding, intelligent, even eloquent young man who did not appear at all menacing, yet he was also a mass murderer, cannibal and necrophile. When he was killed, spooky dad Lionel waged a macabre battle with Dahmer's mother over preserving Jeffrey's brain for study.

Yet another would-be controller was Bob Berdella, the Butcher of Kansas. Like Gacy, Berdella spent his life surrounded by young men and boys. And, again like Gacy, Berdella was quite the torture aficionado. Berdella, however, had made something of a science of the art of torture. He had designed and built his own custom torture bed, and kept a meticulously detailed log of the tortures inflicted upon his victims. These included beatings, electrocution, and the injections of a wide variety of drugs and chemicals into various parts of the body, including the injection of Drano into the throat. While awaiting trial, Berdella was held in isolation in what was described as a 'private area' of the sick bay.

Of those killers who lack the desire to control others, and seem to function purely as controlled assassins, Herb Mullin makes a good case in point. Herb was known to consume large quantities of LSD, and had "Legalize Acid" tattooed across his stomach (Manson's drug of choice for his followers and the CIA's drug of choice for MK-ULTRA projects) and was institutionalized five times in the years preceding his killing spree. One of those times was at a mental institution in Hawaii operated by the U.S. Army. He complained constantly of voices haunting his thoughts, frequently telling others that he was receiving messages.

One of the voices in his head was that of his World War II hero father, commanding him to kill. Despite all this, Mullin passed a psychological exam to enter the Marines shortly before the end of his killing spree. Shortly thereafter he was arrested, at which time he refused to talk to investigators, choosing instead to repetitively chant the word 'silence.' Following his arrest, Mullin claimed to be receiving messages instructing him to kill himself, though he refused the commands. He was diagnosed as a clear case of MPD, with his alter personalities including a Mexican laborer, an eastern philosopher, and - strangely enough - columnist Herb Caen (I couldn't possibly make this shit up).

Arthur Shawcross is another interesting case study of a controlled assassin. Born in a Naval hospital to a Naval officer father, Arthur grew up in a multigenerational family at what was dubbed 'Shawcross Corners.' As a child, he had a number of imaginary friends and spoke in strange voices. His father led a very spooky existence, with another wife and son in Australia. As a boy, Shawcross injured his legs in a fall into a river, and was subjected to brain scans and a variety of other tests that, shall we say, seem a bit odd as treatment for a leg injury. As a young adult, Shawcross was sent to Vietnam, where he apparently served as a Phoenix operative, as previously noted.

During his incarceration for the double child homicide discussed previously, he was treated by several prison psychiatrists, and also improbably began himself working as a counselor with his fellow inmates. Diagnosed as MPD, his alters included an eleven-year-old boy, a 13th century cannibal, and his own mother.

Finally we come to the case of Albert DeSalvo, who was not so much a programmed assassin as he was likely a programmed patsy. DeSalvo had served in the Army from 1948-1956, stationed for most of that time in West Germany, which is where Gary Heidnik would be subjected to MK-ULTRA experimentation some years later. There DeSalvo mastered the art of hand-to-hand combat and became a boxing champion, skills which would not benefit him when he was killed in his prison cell years later by unknown assailants (according to DeSalvo's brother, he may have been drugged the night he was killed).

DeSalvo, as previously noted, was not charged with the Strangler murders for which he is officially credited, but was rather arrested in conjunction with a string of unconnected rapes, assaults and robberies. He was sent to Bridgewater State Hospital where he fell in with a convicted murderer named George Nassar, who was alleged to have committed more than a dozen murders during a period of gang warfare in Boston.

Nassar is frequently described as a genius and a 'master manipulator.' So tight was his control over DeSalvo that Albert's own family was unable to visit him without Nassar being present. It was Nassar who first obtained a 'confession' from DeSalvo and relayed this information to his attorney, F. Lee Bailey. Bailey quickly became DeSalvo's attorney as well, procuring from him a recorded confession which was promptly turned over to police, thereby beginning the process of railroading his own client which was earlier discussed.

Aiding and abetting Bailey in this endeavor was noted CIA hypnotist William Jennings Bryan, whose 'questions' to DeSalvo while under hypnosis were loaded with detailed information about the crimes. Bryan would later be connected to two others who are widely believed to have been under the influence of mind control. One of these was Sirhan Sirhan, purported assassin of Robert Kennedy, whom Bryan was known to have 'treated.'

Oddly enough, throughout Sirhan's diaries was the name of the purported Boston Strangler written repetitively, in what appeared to be a display of a hypnotic phenomenon known as 'automatic writing.' And like other players in this sordid cast, Sirhan was reportedly connected to the Process Church of the Final Judgment.

Bryan was also linked to Candy Jones, the famous model who would tell her tale of being a mind controlled courier (and possibly assassin as well) in The Control of Candy Jones (see recommended reading list). Not long after publication of the book, Bryan was publicly linked to the Candy Jones case by journalists investigating her claims, and he soon thereafter turned up dead in a Las Vegas hotel room.

Before concluding this odyssey, a few comments are in order to address the question of why the U.S. intelligence infrastructure would deliberately create programmed serial killers, as well as creating the concept of the 'serial killer.' A couple of reasons have already been given: to cover-up the existence of Satanic crime in 20th century America, and to disguise the true motive of some contract killings. But there are a few other valuable services that serial killers provide for the state as well.

First and foremost is the rather obvious fact that serial killers scare the hell out of people. With the possible exception of school/workplace shootings, nothing better serves to facilitate the promotion of a 'law-and-order' agenda than the palpable fear aroused by the specter of the marauding serial killer, dividing the population into an every-man-for-himself mentality. Anyone, after all, could be a serial killer hiding behind a mask of civility: a co-worker, a friend, a neighbor, even a family member.

Another function that serial killers serve is in disposing of those members of society who are the most marginalized. For most serial killers, when they aren't killing for a more covert purpose, tend to target those people that Hitler termed the « useless eaters » of society: prostitutes, runaways, junkies, and skid-row alcoholics. In a sense, serial killers are the agents of a rather harshly implemented eugenics program.

A final purpose served by the serial killer profile is that it provides a framework to set up a system of early detection and weeding out of 'violence-prone' individuals. This, of course, assumes the existence of recognizable biological causes and early warning signs. Far more likely is that the serial killer's signature skills - torture, murder, and mutilation - are ones that have been acquired through the teachings of others, and are not attributable to any sort of brain irregularities.

This series was based on a review of some of the literature that has been published on the subject of serial killers. This review was by no means exhaustive and no primary research was done to supplement the existing literature. It is hoped that others will be inspired to look more closely at the cases of individual 'serial killers,' as Maury Terry did with the Son of Sam in The Ultimate Evil and Ed Sanders did with the Manson clan in The Family.

It is my belief that a much different profile of the 'serial killer' will emerge - a profile of the controlled assassin conditioned and programmed by a variety of intelligence fronts, including military entities, psychiatric institutions and Satanic cults. For while serial killers may well be driven by their own internal demons, they are likely not demons of their own making.

It is my belief also that the Satanic underground has largely replaced the Mafia's Murder Incorporated as America's premier nationwide murder-for-hire organization. Researcher and author Michael Newton has written precisely that, in Raising Hell (Avon, 1993). He states that the 'Black Cross,' a faction of the Four-P cult (which is itself a faction of the Process Church), functions specifically as a "Satanic Murder, Inc."

Consider the case of Thomas Creech of Idaho, who in 1975 admitted to performing contract killings over an eight year span on behalf of a national biker gang heavily involved in drug trafficking and cult rituals. Creech claimed that his forty-two killings earned him only eighth place among the gang's contract killers, and that many of them had been performed as « ritual human sacrifices ».

Or consider the case of Bernard Hunwick of Dade County, Florida. Upon his arrest for a series of murders in 1981, he confessed to authorities that he was the leader of a "hit squad" that had committed at least a hundred additional contract killings. Are these merely men suffering from delusions of grandeur? Or are they men who have given the country a peek into a world that few dare to imagine exists in modern-day America?



« ... a Mephistophelean guru who had the unique power to persuade others to murder for him, most of them young girls who went out and savagely murdered total strangers at his command ... » - Vincent Bugliosi describing Charles Manson








« You don't understand me. You are not expected to. You are not capable of it. I am beyond good and evil. Legions of the night, night breed, repeat not the errors of the Night Prowler and show no mercy. »
Richard "The Night Stalker" Ramirez

« There are other 'Sons' out there - God help the world ! »
David "Son of Sam" Berkowitz

« What about your children? You say there are just a few? There are many, many more, coming in the same direction. They are running in the streets - and they are coming right at you ! »
Charles Milles Manson



David McGowan




source:
freddy http://www.whale.to/b/henry.html





FIN




Dernière édition par invitée le Lun 2 Juil 2012 - 21:02, édité 6 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Dim 1 Aoû 2010 - 6:43

NIRVANA - MANGEURS DE BÉBÉS ?






Grand groupe rock des années 90, grunge-out, mec.

Eh bien...


Prise en été 1987, les jeunes gens en tournée. Kurt Cobain à droite, puis le batteur (avant que Dave Grohl rejoigne le groupe,) et le bassiste à gauche, Krist:





Photo prise dans le sous-sol de la mère de Kristl, à Noël 1987. Les jeunes gens jouent juste après avoir tué et avoir mangé une jeune fille de 14 ans. Et je ne pense pas que ce soit un coup de scène, regardez derrière le batteur. Vous pouvez voir les rideaux et les connections pendre (the elect) du plafond et du fouillis, comme dans les sous-sols:




Le dernier album studio de Nirvana... n'en dit pas plus, hein?

Nosferatu, anges déchus, vampire, morts-vivants ...




Bien sûr, ça craint. j'aimais leur musique - BEAUCOUP ! Mais maintenant, la plupart des paroles ont un sens. Des chansons comme Polly, qui parle de l'enlèvement, du viol, et puis du meurtre d'une jeune adolescente... Beaucoup d'autres. Celà a du sens, maintenant. Kurt, comme Eddie de Pearl Jam, ou Layne d'Alice In Chains, tous parlent de l'enlèvement, du viol et du meurtre de jeunes filles. Encore et encore à nouveau.

Ils disaient la vérité, keeping it real. Habitué à penser "mon... quelle sombre imagination il a, ce type..." Maintenant, c'est "vous racontez ça, hein, les gars ?"

Visible et dans notre face. Tout le temps. Nous n'avons juste jamais cru ces entités littéralement sur parole. Nous ferions mieux, à partir de maintenant.

Voyez, parce que ces lézards nous ont montré notre réalité pour un certain temps, maintenant.. Une fois que la réalité complète de tout ça s'installe dans votre tête, alors vous allez comprendre. Seulement à ce moment là.

Et ouais, ça craint. Il n'y a pas de côté positif, là, parce que, ILS SE NOURRISSENT DE NOUS !

Nous sommes le déjeuner. Compris ? Le déjeuner.







Bon, je ne mets pas la source pour ne pas qu'elle disparaisse du net..




Dernière édition par invitée le Ven 28 Déc 2012 - 18:53, édité 4 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Dim 1 Aoû 2010 - 6:45

VAMPYRES











« Nous approchons l'heure de la Moisson Finale. Les dieux anciens se préparent à regagner leurs trônes de pouvoir pour se repaître de millards d'humains agonisants qui feront don de leur énergie vitale pour servir une cause supérieure. »

Voir le topic "NOS ANCIENS «DIEUX» ANNUNAKIS VONT-ILS REVENIR ?"
étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t426-nos-anciens-dieux-annunakis-vont-ils-revenir



vampire vampire vampire


Ce qui est dit à la fin est troublant; ça rejoint (encore !!!) ce que dit Don Bradley:

Et lorsque Nibiru atteindra la Ceinture de Van Allen et brisera l'emprise magnétique, alors ils pourront entrer - l'escadron d'invasion - pendant cette période de 24 heures, lorsque la terre et la lune AURONT CESSÉ LEUR ROTATION.

Souvenez-vous aussi, il y a UN SOLEIL INTERNE, à l'intérieur de la terre creuse - le SOLEIL NOIR, VRIL, qui utilisera aussi ce moment exact pour déchaîner l'enfer.

Le champ magnétique garde aussi les démons des bas éthériques et astraux en échec. Lorsqu'il se brisera, les démons littéraires bibliques de l'enfer (chasseur de fantômes) remonteront aussi à la surface de la terre.



***

Le globe se réchauffe parce que les rayons du soleil sont devenus plus forts depuis 1972, alors qu'il est devenu une étoile d'hélium plutôt que d'hydrogène.

Nibiru est ici. Et les Zetas ne pourraient pas être plus heureux parce que LE DÎNER EST SERVI.



***

Nancy Lieder était là pour induire en erreur, pour discréditer l'arrivée des Nephilim (200 000 000 d'entre eux, en passant), pour qu'au moment de son arrivée (Niburu) personne ne veuille rien entendre.

[...]

Niburu est ici. Les tueurs sont arrivés.



***

L'opération de séduction Pré-tribulatoire


Soyez très prudent face à cela…

Parce que c'est exactement ce que certains de ces «vaisseaux spatiaux» en provenance des Pléiades vont faire, de concert avec BLUEBEAM. Vous faire croire que le christ jr arrive pour sauver les croyants dans des VAISSEAUX DE MÉTAL, EN LES TÉLÉPORTANT.

Pas vraiment. Ils prévoient qu'une large portion du mouvement des bienfaisants droïdes monarques de la CIA embarque joyeusement sur ces appareils, pour être «sauvés».

C'est un mensonge. Il s'agit d'un aller simple pour les horreurs et les travaux forcés dans la prison d'Agarthi, au CENTRE DE LA TERRE, en passant par les pôles. Tout est prêt : l'aéroport de Denver et tous les autres.

Ne tombez pas dans le panneau. DIEU n'a pas besoin de vaisseau spatial.

Difficilement…

Par contre, eux en ont besoin. Et agrippant leur Bible du Roi James 5 lourdement programmée, et avec des étoiles dans les yeux, ils seront contents de donner leur accord pour être téléportés à bord.

Pour le repas.

Et le repas de qui s'agira-t-il d'après vous?



***

Lorsque Charles mourra, William Arthur s'élèvera à sa pleine puissance et ensuite la boucherie commencera.


Don Bradley

étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t300-textes-extraits-du-blog-de-cbswork-don-bradley
étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t350-textes-extraits-du-blog-de-cbswork-suite-don-bradley




vampire vampire vampire


Pour ce qui est de l'enlèvement des chrétiens, (appelé "l'enlèvement de l'Église" dans les Écritures), on peut faire le parallèle avec l'histoire des vaisseaux d'Ashtar Sheran.
étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t427-channelings-new-age-pour-la-fin-des-temps


Le terme de "moisson" qu'on entend à la fin de la vidéo est aussi employé dans les Écritures:

Que dit Matth.13:24-30? « Et il leur dit: "…Laissez-les croître tous deux ensemble jusqu'à la moisson ; et au temps de la moisson, je dirai aux moissonneurs: Cueillez premièrement l'ivraie, et liez-la en bottes pour la brûler, mais assemblez le froment dans mon grenier ».
http://chretiensenreseau.com/forum/topics/lunite-des-chretiens-urgence

Au verset 15, il est écrit : « Et un autre ange sortit du temple, criant d’une voix forte à celui qui était assis sur la nuée: Jette ta faux et moissonne; car le temps de moissonner est venu, parce que la moisson de la terre est mûre. 16 - Alors celui qui était assis sur la nuée, jeta sa faux sur la terre, et la terre fut moissonnée. » Notez que Jésus jette Sa faucille sur la terre car le bon grain est là. Pas dans les nuages, mais bien sur la terre, prêt pour Son retour ! Allons voir la réalité de ce symbolisme décrit dans Matthieu 24:31. Jésus, venant dans la gloire, « enverra ses anges avec un grand éclat de trompette, et ils rassembleront ses élus des quatre vents, depuis un bout des cieux jusqu’à l’autre bout. » La grande récolte de l’Église !

Verset 40 : « Alors, de deux hommes qui seront dans un champ, l’un sera pris et l’autre laissé. » L’élu sera pris, l’autre laissé. Et les femmes ? Eh bien, ceci s’applique aux chrétiennes aussi. Verset 41 : « De deux femmes qui moudront au moulin, l’une sera prise et l’autre laissée. » Verset 44 : « C’est pourquoi vous aussi tenez-vous prêts ; car le Fils de l’homme viendra à l’heure que vous ne pensez pas. »
http://www.moissondeselus.com/temps_recolte.htm


Étant donné que, selon Don Bradley :

Ils ont créé la Bible uniquement pour cette époque. Il s'agit de leur création.


***

Nous avons toujours su, depuis les débuts, que la Bible était le livre du code principal pour le spectacle de la fin des temps. Tout le monde dans la communauté ésotérique, même ceux qui sont déconnectés, savent qu'il s'agit factuellement du cours des choses.


***

Les Canaaites étaient une race d'hybrides reptiliens JUIFS que Yahweh détruisait dans l'Ancien Testament. Une bible tellement distorsionnée par l'église jésuite afin de la rendre pratiquement inutilisable à notre époque pour une compréhension liturgique. Suivre les bibles modernes est comme suivre un spectacle fictif mis en place par les mêmes Annunakis qui les ont distorsionnées. Quelques 37 livres sont manquants et ce qui reste est mutilé au-delà de toute utilisation possible. Il faut les textes originaux Araméens et la Torah pour ne serait-ce que pour se rapprocher d'une certaine compréhension, et ces derniers ne sont généralement pas disponibles en Anglais, seulement en Hébreux.


***

Ils VEULENT que les Révélations s'abattent. Ils font tout ce qui est en leur pouvoir pour les voir se produire. Ceci ne doit pas avoir lieu.

étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t300-textes-extraits-du-blog-de-cbswork-don-bradley
étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t350-textes-extraits-du-blog-de-cbswork-suite-don-bradley




C'est assez troublant... Déjà, les "anges" qui vont répandre les épidémies, on sait qui c'est... Donc, le reste est probablement à l'avenant.



vampire vampire vampire


Pour en revenir à ces vampyres, j'ai essayé de fouiner un peu:

vampire http://www.mondocourau.com/



Ils vont faire un temple en France !!!
vampire http://www.sanguinarium.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11&Itemid=19



Leur forum:
vampire http://www.kaladra.org/

Pas mal, le logo !!!

Le dragon rouge a convaincu un tiers des systèmes dans notre secteur de se séparer de l'ordre des choses, l'amour de soi et l'égo et la vanité et la fierté prenant le dessus sur les pulsions supérieures des individus.

Pourquoi? Je ne sais pas.

Le dragon rouge, en tant qu'ennemi principal est connu comme,

Sanat Kumura (grand satan)
Satan
Lucifer
Sorath
The Morning Star [l'étoile du matin]
The Shining one [le brilliant]
The Watchers [les surveillants] (je pense que la traduction juste serait plutôt "les Veilleurs")
peu importe


Don Bradley

étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t300-textes-extraits-du-blog-de-cbswork-don-bradley
étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t350-textes-extraits-du-blog-de-cbswork-suite-don-bradley




Par contre, pour entrer sur leur forum, impossible; ce n'est que par parrainage:
vampire http://www.kaladra.org/currentofelorath/showthread.php?p=5922

On remarquera la date indiquée....

Et, si on clique sur le lien StrigoiVii.IPBhost.com qu'ils proposent, on tombe sur un autre forum privé .


Edit du 9 juin 2011: les liens indiqués ci-dessus sont devenus invalides peu de temps après que j'aie posté un message à ce sujet sur deux forums assez fréquentés...
Bon, c'est qu'ils veulent rester discrets et qu'ils ont donc des choses à cacher.
En résumé, cela annonçait que le clan StrigoiVii allait construire son super-temple "Kaladra" en France, pour 2012.
Quant au logo avec le "dragon rouge", on peut toujours le retrouver sur leur "temple virtuel" sanguinarium.net :


Edit du 31 aout 2011: Bon, la page a également; mais le logo était celui-ci:





vampire vampire vampire [/center]


Le vampire le plus connu est Dracula:

Le nom du comte est calqué sur un surnom posthume d'un voïvode de Valachie: Vlad Ţepeş. Le père de celui-ci était surnommé Dracul: le « Dragon », car il était membre de l'Ordre du Dragon et Vlad Ţepeş fut qualifié dans certains libelles de Draculea : le « Dragonneau ». Dracul ne fut d'ailleurs pas le surnom du seul Vlad, mais aussi celui d'un autre voïvode plus tardif, Mihai I Şuţu (1730 - 1803, règne de 1783 à 1795). Vlad est un personnage réel que Bram Stoker a découvert au cours de ses lectures, mais le romancier s’est peu inspiré de la figure historique.
(...)
Stoker a également pu avoir connaissance de la Tragica historia[1] de László Turóczi, un jésuite de 1729, relatant les frasques sanglantes de la princesse Élisabeth Báthory (dans l'actuelle Slovaquie), qui avait inspiré de nombreuses nouvelles au XIXe siècle. Il semble que Stoker ait, également, été influencé par le mythe des goules buveuses de sang de son Irlande natale, et il est certain qu'il a eu connaissance, fut-ce indirectement, des légendes balkaniques au sujet des Vrykolakas, puisqu'il plaça dans la bouche de paysans roumains des mots tels que "vrolok" et "vlkoslak" (en vrai roumain : "vârcolac").


wikipedia




Étrangement, selon des recherches généalogiques, la lignée de Bush remonterait jusqu'à Vlad Tepes !!!





Bref, j'ai bien l'impression que si "la base" du mouvement vampyres est composée en apparence de personnes un peu farfelues, il se cache autre chose de beaucoup moins anodin derrière tout ça.

Je suis tombée sur le site du clan "Hidden shadows":
vampire http://www.hiddenshadowsvamp.com/frames.html

Les photos et vidéos (notamment " Hidden Shadows & Penthouse Footage") sont déjà assez inquiétantes.
Et comme elles sont visibles par tous, je ne pense pas qu'il y ait le pire.

D'ailleurs, en 1996, Susan Walsh, journaliste, a disparu.
Elle enquêtait alors sur le mouvement vampire new-yorkais et sur des disparitions de sang dans les hôpitaux de New York.
Elle avait évoqué un « réseau Dracula » avant de disparaître.

vampire http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vampire
vampire http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/missing-presumed-undead-1361187.html

Selon Fritz Springmeier, Al Gore n'est pas hémophile, mais qu'il transporterait du sang dans sa mallette (tel que cela a été exposé dans les médias américains), en raison de sa dépendance à l'adrénaline, laquelle est présente en grandes quantités dans le sang de victimes sacrifiées rituellement qui, terrorisées, ont secrété énormément de cette substance dans le sang. Cette opinion se rapproche de celles de David Icke sur les sacrifices rituels accomplis par les reptiliens...

Je suis certaine que s'il l'on suivait à la trace toutes les pochettes de sang prélévé lors les dons de sang, on aurait de grosses surprises.

Ceci est sans doute une des raisons de la disparition des transfusions de plasma de Quinton pratiquées dans les hopitaux avant la première guerre mondiale, et remplacées par les transfusions sanguines, pourtant moins bénéfiques pour l'organisme.
étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t533-serum-de-quinton

Les Nephilims et leur progéniture, les fils de Bélial, préfèrent le sang à l'eau salée...


Petit dico du parfait vampyre, sur un de leur site:
vampire http://www.house-eclipse.org/dictionary/a.shtml

On y retrouve des "dieux anciens" (Seth, Lilith,...), the Beast, le Dragon et les Illuminati y sont souvent mentionnés.
Je sais pas trop pourquoi, j'ai pas trop fouiné. Par contre, j'ai cherché certains termes sur google, et, c'est bizarre, je tombe souvent sur des jeux de rôle:
vampire http://www.augias.org/pbn_fr/khaibit.htm

Et, ce qui est encore plus bizarre, c'est que les descriptions des personnages ou des groupes dans ces jeux de rôles ont l'air de reposer sur certaines références occultes réelles; un peu comme du Dan Brown.


Tiens, tiens, à la lettre N du dico:

The Nephilim (general)

A rather widespread belief within the vampiric community, which asserts that vampires are the descendants of the Nephilim. The Nephilim are demi-human beings that were sired by angels, as related in Enoch I, a book that was dropped from the Bible in the early stages of its canonization. Some Nephilists believe that the vampiric condition is genetically traceable to these otherworldly fathers. Others are content to suggest that the Nephilim simply represent a higher kind of being which came down and intermingled with humanity. As far as the beliefs of the second order of Nephilists are concerned, vampires experience their condition because they are more spiritual than most beings, with a higher "vibration" or "frequency" to their spirit which somehow burns their bodies out quicker and makes it necessary to feed. Some Nephilists feed upon blood, while many others feed primarily upon life-energy. Most seem to incorporate blood into their magic and ritual.



Traduction:

Une croyance assez répandue au sein de la communauté vampirique affirme que les vampires sont les descendants des Nephilim. Les Nephilim sont des êtres demi-humains qui ont été engendrés par les anges [déchus, bien sûr], selon ce qui est est relaté dans Enoch I, un livre qui a été supprimé de la Bible au début de sa canonisation. Certains Nephilistes croient que l'état vampirique est génétiquement traçable jusqu'à ces pères d'un autre monde. Les autres se contentent de suggérer que les Nephilim représentent simplement une espèce supérieure d'êtres qui est descendue et s'est mêlée à l'humanité. En ce qui concerne les croyances du second groupe de Nephilistes, les vampires vivent leur condition parce qu'ils sont plus spirituels que la plupart des êtres, avec une plus haute «vibration» ou «fréquence» de leur esprit, qui, en quelque sorte, consume leurs corps plus rapidement et rend nécessaire de s'alimenter. Certains Nephilistes s'alimentent à partir de sang, tandis que d'autres s'alimentent principalement sur l'énergie vitale. La plupart semblent incorporer le sang à leur magie et à leur rituels.



C'est bien ça, alors. Ce mouvement est bien lié aux Nephilims... effrayé



vampire vampire vampire


Les Hybrides Nephilim sont partout… Regardez les images sur tous ces sites de Braden, Twyman, Drunvalo, où ils VEULENT PRENDRE VOS ENFANTS ÉTOILES pour un été ou trois. Et c'est exact. Ils SONT des enfants étoiles.

Des étoiles déchues. Des hybrides. Regardez leurs fronts et leurs yeux. Regardez à quel point ces yeux sont remplis et noirs, les pires Reptiliens Pléiadiens.

Si le monde connaissait véritablement les chiffres - de centaines de millions de Nephilims sur cette planète, ils se suicideraient de terreur.

On m'en a montré la magnitude récemment, chaque ami, qui que ce soit, quoi que ce soit… plus le brouillard de noirceur au-dessus des terres.

Mon Dieu… mon Dieu.


***

Le meilleur truc de Satan

Est de vous faire croire qu'il n'existe pas. Ou encore ses représentants, les salopards d'Anges Déchus Nephilim Reptiliens, qui dirigent notre planète.

Les vrais chiffres font frémir, c'est horrible à ce point.


***

Ce sont des hybrides. Pas Humains. En fait, à moitié humain. Mais Nephilim, Annunaki, mort-vivants. Ils dirigent le monde, ils contrôlent tout et ils ont eu tout ce qu'ils voulaient pendant beaucoup trop longtemps, n'êtes-vous pas d'accord?


***


Reconnaître les Nephilim


C'est facile. Ils ont un tatouage de disque ailé à la hauteur du chakra du cœur, entre leurs omoplates dans le dos. Des exemples évidents? Allez à la plage. Des douzaines partout.

Regardez les logos des groupes,

Aerosmith et Van Halen.

Symboles de disques solaires Annunaki.

Eddie et Alex sont des reptoïdes, tout comme Steven Tyler et Joe Perry. Fait.

Vérifiez par vous-même.


***

Eminem = Emim

Un des anges déchus ou reptiliens. À présent, le soi-disant artiste EMINEM est l'incarnation de la haine, de la destruction du divin, et du chaos.

C'était une déclaration directement DANS VOTRE FIGURE de la présence reptilienne, et personne ne s'en est aperçu. Bien, pas tout à fait PERSONNE.

Les Emims étaient des hybrides génétiques qui dirigeaient l'ère prédiluvienne, pré-Atlantis et dirigeaient aussi le 7ème royaume d'Atlantis. Ils étaient énormes, vicieux, mangeaient des humains, et assassinaient à volonté.

Les Emims sont de retour. Leur représentant mène VOS enfants directement en…

…enfer.


***

Rappelez-vous de la nouvelle trilogie des films Star Wars.

Premièrement, l'acteur qui joue Anakim Skywalker n'est PAS humain. Il est une dérivation et un clone du PRINCE WILLIAM ARTHUR, la future bête, le faux messie de merde. Ils ont en fait cloné le prince et y ont incorporé cette entité démonique.

Aussi, Anakim dans le film est aussi le nom d'une des factions reptiliennes du lointain passé. Ceci n'est aucunement une coïncidence.

[…]

Les Anakim sont au repos, en orbite au dessus de l'Antarctique, en attendant d'envahir le monde. ACTUELLEMENT.

Anakim Skywalker [marcheur dans le ciel] - Visible et en plein dans votre face.


***

Les Zetas

Ils NE sont PAS ici pour nous aider. Ils sont ici pour nous faire esclaves. Qu'est-ce que vous pensez qui se prépare sous l'Aéroport de Denver? Une nouvelle attraction Disney dans la noirceur pour les enfants?

Ils sont les ENNEMIS de l'humanité.

Est-ce que nemesis et ennemis sont une sorte d'anagramme? Un certain type?

Il semblerait que oui.

Ils sont Annunaki. Nephilim. Des demies-races. Des Anges déchus. Des Jedi. Des morts-vivants. Des mangeurs d'enfants. Des Maîtres Ascendés. Les créatures de Satan. Les propriétaires et maîtres de la NSA, de la CIA et du MI6, et d'innombrables autres itérations du genre de la communauté des renseignements.

Les gens qui essaient de vous dire que les reptiliens sont ici pour nous "aider" sont véritablement les pires êtres humains sur la planète. Et heureusement, même eux serviront un jour de nourriture, lorsqu'ils ne seront plus d'aucune utilité pour les morts-vivants. Alors, il y a un certain réconfort dans ce genre de justice satanique.


***

Aussi, il n'y a pas de ZETAS. Il ne s'agit que d'un système solaire rebellé, un des sept systèmes solaires, incluant trois planètes de notre propre système solaire (Rahab, Mars et la Terre), qui ont joint la rébellion contre la Sainteté, la Divinité. ILS sont NEPHILIM, ANNUNAKI, TOMBÉS, HYBRIDES, ANGES DÉCHUS, APOSTATS.

Ils sont les ennemis de la divinité, et ont tenté d'usurper la hiérarchie propre à la création, en essayant de la manipuler. Ce sont les Jedi, les morts-vivants. Les Maîtres de la soi-disant Sagesse. Les surveillants. Draconiens. Reptiles. Ils n'ont pas de chakra du cœur.



Don Bradley

étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t300-textes-extraits-du-blog-de-cbswork-don-bradley
étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t350-textes-extraits-du-blog-de-cbswork-suite-don-bradley




Pour en savoir plus sur les Néphilims, voir le sous-forum " Reptiliens/Nephilims/Annunakis ".
étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/f48-reptiliens-nephilims-annunakis/




Dernière édition par invitée le Ven 28 Déc 2012 - 18:58, édité 22 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Dim 1 Aoû 2010 - 6:46

UN EX-VAMPIRE TÉMOIGNE










William (Bill) Schnoebelen, né en 1949, est un écrivain évangéliste chrétien. Il est connu pour ses opinions anti-satanistes, anti-mormons, anti-wiccans et antimaçonniques, ayant lui-même, selon ses dires, fait partie de tous ces mouvements durant sa vie.

Avant de devenir un chrétien né de nouveau en 1984, William Schnoebelen aurait, selon ses dires, fait partie de l'Eglise de Satan durant 7 ans, de la franc-maçonnerie durant 9 ans, et de l'Église de Jésus-Christ des saints des derniers jours (Mormons) durant 5 ans.

Il aurait ainsi collectionné les grades initiatiques et les titres maconniques : 32ème degré du Rite écossais ancien et accepté, 90ème degré du rite de Memphis-Misraïm, 10ème degré du rite de York, 2ème degré de l'Eglise de Satan (Ordre du Trapèze), Shriner, Sorcier Wiccan et membre des Illuminati (1er degré). Il dénonce principalement, dans la haute maçonnerie illuministe (très mal connue des basses loges rationalistes), un culte du phallus luciférien farouchement opposé aux valeurs du christianisme ainsi qu'une résurgence des cultes à mystères de l'Antiquité.

William Schnoebelen affirme également que la Watchtower, organisation qui gère l'Eglise des Témoins de Jehovah, ainsi que les dirigeants de Église de Jésus-Christ des saints des derniers jours, sont en réalité des initiés lucifériens qui utilisent ces mouvements pour camoufler en leur sein d'anciens sorciers.

L'aspect le plus intéressant, mais aussi le plus intriguant de son parcours, est incontestablement son initiation vampirique qui le contraignit pendant plus d'une année à se nourrir exclusivement de sang et d'hostie catholique.















Bon, je ne sais pas si ce témoignange est fiable; perso, j' ai de gros doutes.
Non pas que certains des faits rapportés ici n'existent pas; j'ai lu de nombreux témoignages, notamment dans les dossiers X de l'affaire Dutroux, de cérémonies durant lesquelles les participants buvaient du sang et mangeaient de la chair humaine.
Mais, lui, je trouve que ça fait beaucoup; avoir été à la fois prêtre catholique et pasteur, avoir fait partie d'autant de groupes occultes, dormir dans un cercueil,...
Je sais pas, je trouve qu'il en fait trop pour que ce soit crédible. En plus, des gros poissons comme il prétend l'être, ils sont éliminés, quand ils quittent le Réseau.
Mais, bon... comme ce qu'il décrit rejoint les témoignage de Svali et des enfants Roche sur de nombreux points, c'est peut-être vrai, en fin de compte.
Ceci dit, abandonner tout ça pour finir chez les Evangélistes chrétiens, mouvement millénariste créé par les Illuminati dans le but de préparer la venue de l' "Antéchrist" et sa reconnaissance comme le "Messie", il faut le faire.




Dernière édition par invitée le Ven 28 Déc 2012 - 19:02, édité 10 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Lun 9 Aoû 2010 - 16:31

LA COMTESSE SANGLANTE









Il est impossible de s'intéresser au phénomène, réel ou imaginaire, du vampirisme sans se référer à un personnage qui défraya la chronique au XVIIème siècle en Hongrie et Transylvanie, et qui a provoqué, dans la mémoire des peuples, l'apparition d'une image surprenante, ambiguë, terrifiante, qui est loin de laisser indifférent : la comtesse Elizabeth Bathory est en effet une des incarnations les plus caractéristiques de ce que l'on a coutume de classer dans la catégorie des vampires humains, malgré les interférences inévitables qui se sont produites entre ce que l'on sait de sa vie et des zones d'ombre que l'on n'a pas osé dévoiler en plein jour. Ce fut une criminelle, assurément. Mais ce fut aussi une femme mystérieuse qui a emporté dans la tombe de lourds secrets qu'il est bien difficile de cerner en toute objectivité.

Elizabeth Bathory est née en 1560, d'une famille de sang royal, comptant dans ses proches parents le prince de Transylvanie, Sigismond Bathory, un oncle qui devint roi de Pologne, des gouverneurs de province, de hauts magistrats, des évêques et un cardinal. Cette famille remontait très loin dans le temps et comptait un certain nombre d'aventuriers hongrois descendant probablement des Huns et qui s'étaient imposés par le sang et la violence, comme il était de règle à ces époques troublées où la Hongrie allait passer d'un paganisme pur et dur à un catholicisme très inféodé à Rome. Du temps d'Elizabeth, rien n'était d'ailleurs vraiment net dans cette région bouleversée par l'apparition des Réformateurs luthériens et calvinistes et où le catholicisme romain se heurtait au Christianisme orthodoxe et aux innombrables communautés musulmanes disséminées par les Turcs. Sans parler des vestiges virulents d'un paganisme hérité du fonds asiatique :" L'ancienne terre des Daces était païenne encore, et sa civilisation avait deux siècles de retard sur celle de l'Europe occidentale. Là, régnaient, gouvernées par une mystérieuse déesse Mielliki, les innombrables forces des grands bois, tandis qu'à l'Ouest, le vent habitait seul, la montagne de Nadas. Il y avait un dieu unique, Isten, et l'arbre d'Isten, l'herbe d'Isten, l'oiseau d'Isten... Dans les Carpates superstitieuses, il y avait surtout le diable, Ordôg, servi par des sorcières, elles-mêmes assistées de chiens et de chats noirs. Et tout venait encore des esprits de la nature et des fées des éléments ; de Delibab, la fée de midi aimée du vent et mère des mirages, des Tünders, sœurs de toutes merveilles et de la Vierge de la cascade peignant ses cheveux d'eau. Dans les cercles d'arbres sacrés, de chênes et de noyers féconds, se célébraient encore secrètement les anciens cultes du soleil et de la lune, de l'aurore, et du cheval noir de la nuit. " C'est dans cette atmosphère très particulière, encombrée de sortilèges et de traditions ancestrales venus d'ailleurs, que se déroula l'enfance d'Elizabeth Bathory, et cela explique certainement beaucoup de choses concernant le comportement et le mode de pensée de cette comtesse qu'il faut bien se résoudre à qualifier de ", sanglante ".Il faut aussi prendre en compte la lourde hérédité d'Elizabeth : sa lignée ne comportait pas que des petits saints, bien au contraire. Un certain nombre de ses ancêtres avaient été des brutes sanguinaires, et dans sa parenté immédiate se trouvaient quelques homosexuels mâles notoires. Un de ses frères était un dépravé pour lequel tout était bon, la plus tendre fillette comme la plus ratatinée des femmes âgées. Une de ses tantes grande dame de la cour de Hongrie défrayait la chronique scandaleuse : lesbienne impénitente, on disait tribade à l'époque, elle était tenue pour responsable de la dépravation de douzaines de petites filles. Et puis, la propre nourrice d'Elizabeth, joIlona, qui deviendra son âme damnée, personnage trouble et inquiétant, pratiquant la magie noire et les sortilèges les plus pervers, eut une influence déterminante sur l'évolution de son esprit.

Les descriptions qu'on possède d'Elizabeth Bathory, ainsi qu'un portrait qu'on en a conservé, nous la montrent d'une grande beauté : " Les démons étaient déjà en elle; ses yeux larges et noirs les cachaient en leur morne profondeur ; son visage était pâle de leur antique poison. Sa bouche était sinueuse comme un petit serpent qui passe, son front haut, obstiné, sans défaillance. Et le menton, appuyé sur la grande fraise plate, avait cette courbe molle de l'insanité ou du vice particulier. Elle ressemblait à quelque Valois dessiné par Clouet, Henri III peut-être, en féminin. " Bref, quelque chose de mélancolique, de secret et de cruel. Le blason des Bathory n'était-il pas composé de trois dents de loup, d'un croissant de lune, d'un soleil en forme d'étoile à six pointes, le tout entouré d'un dragon qui se mord la queue ?
On ne sait pas grand-chose sur la jeunesse et l'adolescence d'Elizabeth, sinon qu'elle se réfugiait souvent dans une solitude farouche. Par ailleurs, depuis son plus jeune âge, elle souffrait de maux de tête parfois intolérables qui la faisaient se rouler par terre. Était-ce de l'épilepsie ? Il semble plutôt qu'Elizabeth était en proie à des crises d'hystérie qu'il serait tentant d'assimiler à des crises de possession démoniaque.

Mais cette hystérie explique en partie sa déviance sexuelle : sa sensualité était exacerbée, mais morbide, et si elle ne refusa pas les contacts masculins, elle évolua toute sa vie dans des retraites peuplées uniquement de femmes ; elle ne sacrifia jamais un seul homme à ses débauches, mais uniquement des femmes, et elle était incontestablement homosexuelle. On prétend même que c'est sa tante Klara Bathory, qu'elle fréquentait assidûment, qui l'avait initiée au culte de Sapho.
Il faut dire que l'homosexualité était à la mode, en cette fin de XVIème siècle: à Paris, la cour des Valois donnait un exemple que s'empressaient de suivre les autres cours européennes, orientales autant qu'occidentales, celle de Rome ne faisant pas exception. Et le lesbianisme descendait même dans la rue :en Allemagne et dans tout le Saint-Empire, il y avait encore des héritières de cette étrange secte de triba des flagellantes qui parcouraient, au XlVe siècle, les villes et les villages, se mettant nues en public, se fouettant mutuellement, hurlant des chants et pratiquant des attouchements indécents. Vestiges d'un culte de la Déesse des Origines ? Probablement, mais avec des rituels érotiques sanguinaires. On peut toujours se demander si Elizabeth Bathory, si précocement initiée par sa tante Klara, n'a pas consacré sa vie à cette religion instinctuelle et viscérale tout entière vouée à l'adoration de la Grande Déesse des temps obscurs, celle qu'on a prisé trop hâtivement pour la terrible Hécate lunaire, divinité grecque des carrefours (où rôde également le Diable !), et qui n'est en réalité que l'image du Soleil rouge, divinité ô combien féminine, la fameuse et cruelle Artémis des Scythes, celle qui, dans la tragédie d'Euripide, Iphigénie en Tauride, réclame incessamment le sang des mortels pour nourrir son existence surnaturelle ? Il y a là un bel exemple de vampirisme. Mais l'homosexualité d'Elizabeth Bathory n'était pas exclusive. On lui prête plusieurs aventures masculines avant son mariage et après son veuvage. Toute jeune, immédiatement après sa puberté, elle aurait eu une petite fille d'un paysan. Elle avait quatorze ans et elle était déjà fiancée à Férencz Nàdasdy, un comte appartenant à la meilleure noblesse hongroise, redoutable guerrier qui devint illustre et mérita, par la suite, le titre de " Héros noir de la Hongrie ". Mais on sait ce que signifiaient les mariages dans la bonne société d'alors. Il semble que, se trouvant enceinte, elle demanda à Ursula Nàdasdy, mère de son fiancé, laquelle était chargée de sa " protection ", la permission d'aller dire adieu à sa propre mère, Anna Bathory, accompagnée d'une seule femme en qui elle avait toute confiance. On ne dit pas si Anna Bathory approuva le comportement de sa fille, mais elle fit contre mauvaise fortune bon cœur. Craignant le scandale et la rupture du mariage de sa fille, elle aurait amené secrètement Elizabeth dans un de ses châteaux les plus éloignés, du côté de la Transylvanie, laissant courir le bruit que sa fille, atteinte d'une maladie contagieuse, avait besoin de repos et d'isolement absolus. Elle l'aurait alors soignée, aidée d'une femme venue du château familial de Csejthe et d'une accoucheuse qui avait fait le serment de ne rien révéler. Une petite fille serait donc née, à laquelle on aurait donné également le prénom d'Elizabeth, et qui aurait été confiée., Moyennant pension, à la femme de Csejthe qui avait accompagné sa fille. Quant à la sage-femme, elle fut renvoyée de Roumanie avec de quoi vivre largement, mais interdiction de jamais revenir en Hongrie. C'est alors qu'Elizabeth Bathory et sa mère seraient parties directement pour Varanno où devaient êtres célébrés les noces de l'héritière des Bathory avec l'héritier des Nàdasdy.



Château de Csejthe


Ces noces eurent lieu le 8 mai 1575. Elizabeth avait quinze ans, et son mari en avait vingt et un. L'empereur Maximilien de Habsbourg assista lui-même au mariage. Le roi Matthias de Hongrie et l'archiduc d'Autriche envoyèrent de somptueux cadeaux aux nouveaux époux qui s'en allèrent passer leur lune de miel dans le château de Csejthe, dans le district de Nyitra, région montagneuse du nord-ouest de la Hongrie, encore célèbre aujourd'hui par la qualité de ses vignobles, mais aussi pour ses châteaux forts en ruines, ses histoires de fantômes et ses traditions vivaces de vampires et de loups-garous. Mais le séjour de Férencz Nàdasdy fut de courte durée. Ses devoirs de combattant l'appelaient à la guerre à travers toute la Hongrie et les pays avoisinants. Il laissa donc sa jeune et belle épouse régner sur le château de Csejthe et sur les vastes domaines qui l'entouraient. Que se passa-t-il donc alors ? Il est probable que la sensualité d'Elizabeth, fortement éveillée par son mari - qui lui fit d'ailleurs deux enfants - se sentit quelque peu frustrée. On lui prêta plusieurs intrigues amoureuses, mais sans lendemain, dont une avec un de ses cousins, le comte Gyorgy Thurzo, futur premier ministre de Hongrie et qui fut d'ailleurs, par la suite, son juge le plus sévère.
Cela ne veut pas dire que les époux ne s'entendaient pas bien : au contraire, leurs retrouvailles étaient toujours de nouvelles lunes de miel. Mais le seul tort du mari était d'être trop souvent absent. Et, un jour de 1586 ou 1587, alors que Férencz Nàdasdy était en plein combat contre les Serbes, on raconte qu'arriva au château de Csejthe " un grand jeune homme au teint cadavérique, dont le nom est resté perdu pour l'histoire. Il était habillé de noir, avait de profonds yeux noirs et de longs cheveux noirs tombant jusqu'aux épaules. Lorsque les servantes de la comtesse racontèrent au village de Csejthe qu'il avait aussi des canines qu'elles jugeaient anormalement longues, plus personne ne douta qu'un vampire s'était installé au château, et les villageois n'allèrent plus se coucher sans avoir soigneusement barricadé leurs portes et leurs fenêtres avec des planches ". Cette histoire s'inscrit très bien dans le décor que suscite le personnage hors pair de la comtesse Bathory, mais elle est plus que suspecte. Toujours est-il qu'Elizabeth s'absenta pendant plusieurs semaines. Était-elle partie avec son " vampire " ? Les villageois murmurèrent, paraît-il, que la comtesse avait été littéralement " vampirisée " par le sombre inconnu. Il est plus vraisemblable de croire que cet homme était une sorte de sorcier, ou de prêtre plein, qui initia Elizabeth à certaines pratiques magiques. Car elle ne faisait pas mystère de ses fréquentations auprès des mages, des sorcières et autres personnages, toujours féminins, qui officiaient dans les forêts, à l'abri des regards indiscrets.

Plus intrigante est la relation entretenue réellement par Elizabeth Bathory avec une mystérieuse inconnue, dont personne ne savait le nom, et qui venait voir Elizabeth, déguisée en garçon. Une servante avait dit à deux hommes, - ils en témoignèrent au procès -, que, sans le vouloir, elle avait surpris la comtesse seule avec cette inconnue, torturant une jeune fille dont les bras étaient attachés très serrés et si couverts de sang qu'on ne les voyait plus. Ce n'était pas une paysanne, mais une femme de qualité qui, sans être masquée, éprouvait le besoin de se travestir, sans doute pour éviter de se faire reconnaître. Cette visiteuse, pour laquelle on emploie le mot " dame ", était-elle une amie descendue de quelque château des environs pour ces fêtes à deux ? Amie ignorée et intermittente, en tout cas, puisqu'à Csejthe on connaissait à peu près tout le monde appartenant à la contrée. Une étrangère ? Alors, quelles étaient exactement les relations entre elle et Elizabeth ? Leurs sadiques plaisirs étaient-ils les seuls ? Il est bien difficile de répondre, d'autant plus que si la comtesse Bathory a commis et fait commettre d'innombrables crimes de sang sur des jeunes filles, on a considérablement brodé sur son action. Et ce ne sont pas les minutes de son procès, pourtant fort précises quant aux témoignages recueillis, qui peuvent donner la solution des véritables motivations d'Elizabeth Bathory.



Sceau royal original Barthory


Cependant, Férencz Nàdasdy mourut soudainement en 1604. Devenue veuve, la comtesse semble n'avoir rien changé à son mode de vie. Les tortures qu'elle infligeait à ses servantes, elle les pratiquait depuis longtemps et son mari le savait parfaitement, considérant celles-ci comme de simples amusements de la part de sa femme. D'ailleurs, dans toutes les maisons nobles de ce temps, il était courant de fouetter les servantes pour un oui ou pour un non. L'état de servage n'existait plus en Hongrie, mais les vieilles habitudes ont du mal à disparaître, surtout quand elles sont acceptées, bon gré, mal gré, par celles qui en sont les victimes. L'un des témoignages du procès est catégorique : à la question de savoir depuis combien de temps la comtesse maltraitait les jeunes filles, un témoin répond : " Elle commença quand son mari était encore en vie, mais alors ne les tuait pas. Le comte le savait et ne s'en souciait guère. " On raconte une curieuse anecdote à ce sujet, non pas sur le début des sévices opérés par Elizabeth, mais sur la naissance de sa fascination pour le sang qui coule. " Un jour qu'elle avait frappé une servante assez violemment pour la faire saigner du nez, parce qu'elle lui avait tiré les cheveux en la peignant, un peu du sang de la jeune fille tomba sur le poignet d'Elizabeth. Un peu plus tard, la comtesse crut remarquer que la peau de l'endroit où était tombé le sang était devenue plus blanche et plus douce que la peau environnante. Intriguée, elle se baigna le visage avec le sang d'une des victimes de ses orgies sadiques. Son visage lui sembla rajeuni et revivifié par le traitement. "

Le souci primordial d'Elizabeth Bathory, depuis son plus jeune âge, avait été sa beauté: elle avait une peur atroce de vieillir et de s'enlaidir. Il n'en fallait pas plus pour s'imaginer qu'elle pouvait indéfiniment préserver sa beauté grâce à du sang frais de jeunes filles, de préférence vierges, donc revêtues de cette aura magique que confère la virginité. " Le sang, c'est la vie ! " répétait Renfield au docteur Seward. Mais pour Elizabeth Bathory, la vie, c'était la beauté et la jeunesse. Si l'anecdote est vraie, on comprend mieux ce goût du sang chez elle. Et cela nous ramène inévitablement au vampirisme.

Elizabeth Bathory passait son temps au château de Csejthe, faisant également de fréquents séjours à Presbourg et surtout dans la demeure qu'elle avait acquise à Vienne, non loin de la cathédrale, demeure qui semble avoir été marquée aussi par de sanglantes orgies. À Csejthe comme ailleurs, Elizabeth était toujours accompagnée de sa nourrice jo Ilona et de sa servante Dorottya Szentes, dite Dorko, deux femmes vieilles, vulgaires, sales, d'une totale immoralité et probablement sectatrices d'une de ces mystérieuses cohortes de sorcières avorteuses qui pullulaient encore dans les campagnes de l'Europe centrale. Il semble qu'elles aient été les principales pourvoyeuses de " chair fraiche " de la comtesse, en même temps que ses "agents d'exécution " quand il s'agissait de frapper, de saigner, puis d'enterrer les malheureuses victimes. Autour de ce duo infernal, il y avait un homme à tout faire, Ujvari johanes, dit Ficzko, une sorte de nabot disgracieux, et une lavandière, Katalin Beniezky. Elizabeth vivait au milieu de cette troupe entièrement vouée à son service et à la satisfaction de ses instincts les plus bas. Cela constituait pour elle le personnel permanent et indispensable. Mais il y avait aussi le personnel " volant ", de belles jeunes filles dont elle faisait ses servantes, et parfois ses concubines, du moins tant qu'elle y trouvait une certaine nouveauté. Car ces " servantes " disparaissaient les unes après les autres, et il fallait bien que le " personnel permanent " se chargeât de renouveler un cheptel qui devait être toujours jeune et beau. Certes, il y en avait toujours en réserve. On prétend même que la comtesse veillait à ce que ces jeunes filles retenues prisonnières fussent bien nourries et engraissées, car elle croyait que plus elles étaient dodues, plus elles avaient de sang dans les veines, et que plus elles étaient bien portantes, plus la vertu de ce sang était efficace. Plus que jamais, le sang était la vie: Elizabeth Bathory croyait-elle pouvoir échapper au vieillissement et à la mort, et gagner ainsi une éternelle jeunesse ? Il semble qu'il faille prendre très au sérieux cette conviction.

Un autre personnage vint bientôt compléter la sinistre troupe, une certaine Darvulia Anna. On a largement brodé sur cette femme sous prétexte que son nom évoque celui de Dracula. Il n'est pas nécessaire d'en venir là, car il apparaît que Darvulia était une sorcière de la meilleure tradition, une magicienne noire qui connaissait des formules et des incantations sataniques et qui n'hésitait pas, comme le fera plus tard la Voisin, en France, au moment de l'affaire des Poisons, à procéder à des sacrifices humains pour obtenir l'aide des puissances démoniaques. Sans doute Darvulia Anna sut-elle convaincre Elizabeth Bathory, déjà quadragénaire mais toujours très belle, qu'elle connaissait les recettes infaillibles pour prolonger indéfiniment cette beauté. La comtesse ne put plus se passer de Darvulia, et il est établi que la présence de cette " sorcière" ne fit qu'augmenter la fréquence des " sacrifices " qu'Elizabeth offrait à la mystérieuse divinité assoiffée de sang qu'elle n'avait jamais cessé d'adorer depuis sa plus tendre enfance. Les plus belles filles de Transylvanie et de Hongrie, lorsqu'elles étaient repérées par les émissaires de la comtesse, prenaient le chemin du château de Csejthe. Tous les moyens étaient bons : menaces, intimidation, promesses d'argent, achat pur et simple dans certaines familles pauvres. Mais la plupart d'entre elles ne ressortaient jamais plus de la sinistre forteresse.

On a probablement fort exagéré les récits concernant les supplices infligés à ces innocentes jeunes filles par la comtesse Bathory et ses âmes damnées. Mais il en est de suffisamment établis pour se faire une idée de l'atmosphère malsaine et macabre qui régnait dans les souterrains du château de Csejthe. Les filles étaient frappées avec violence. Certaines avaient le cou percé selon la plus pure tradition vampirique. D'autres étaient liées avec des cordes qu'on tordait ensuite afin qu'elles puissent s'enfoncer dans les chairs, ce qui permettait de leur ouvrir les veines et de faire jaillir le sang sur la comtesse. On prétend même' qu'on remplissait parfois des baignoires de sang et qu'Elizabeth s'y baignait avec ravissement. Mais comme sa peau délicate ne supportait pas d'être essuyée avec des serviettes, ce sont d'autres filles qui devaient la débarrasser du sang en lui léchant tout le corps avec leurs langues. Celles qui, ne supportant pas une telle horreur, s'évanouissaient, étaient ensuite sévèrement châtiées avant de servir de victimes à leur tour. On imagine aisément le contexte érotique de ces rituels. Selon certaines sources, toujours quelque peu discutables, certaines de ces jeunes filles finissaient leur vie dans le lit même de la comtesse. Elizabeth faisait venir les filles qui lui plaisaient le mieux et s'abîmait avec elles des nuits entières dans des embrassements - et des embrasements - homosexuels, avant de les mordre cruellement, parfois jusqu'à la mort. On comprend que de telles relations aient pu intéresser au plus haut point un spécialiste de l'érotisme dans la souffrance comme l'a été Georges Bataille, et aussi inspirer un certain nombre de films plus ou moins érotiques, mais parfaitement sadiques.

Il y a aussi la fameuse "Vierge de Fer". Est-ce une légende ? Actuellement, cet automate monstrueux peut encore être vu au château de Riegersburg, en Styrie. Est-ce celui dont, paraît-il, se servait la comtesse Bathory? Il s'agissait d'une statue de bois articulée, avec des mécanismes de fer, en forme de femme. Image de la déesse cruelle qu'adorait Elizabeth ? Peut-être. Ce qu'il y avait de terrible dans cet automate, c'était les pointes acérées qui pouvaient transpercer les corps qu'on soumettait à l'étreinte de la "Vierge". Car il est possible que des filles aient été ainsi livrées à la Vierge de Fer: les bras de celle-ci se refermaient sur le jeune corps et le pressaient de plus en plus contre les pointes acérées, permettant au sang de couler en abondance, sous les yeux d'Elizabeth et de celles qui partageaient obligatoirement ses infernales jouissances. La comtesse Bathory eût certainement été très à l'aise dans l'élaboration d'un Musée des Tortures. Et même si cette histoire de Vierge de Fer est une légende racontée après coup, l'anecdote reste néanmoins significative: toute la vie d'Elizabeth était imprégnée de sang, parce que le sang, c'est la vie.

Cependant, même si l'on est un personnage considérable, même si l'on est apparenté aux plus nobles familles de Hongrie, de Roumanie et du Saint-Empire, même si l'on prend des précautions pour éviter que les langues se délient, de telles manoeuvres ne passent pas inaperçues. On n'empêche pas certaines personnes de murmurer. On n'empêche pas les allusions, et ces allusions se colportent de village en village. Trop, c'est trop... Des rumeurs incroyables parvinrent jusqu'à la cour de Vienne, et les autorités ecclésiastiques, sentant qu'il y avait sans doute des pratiques relevant de l'hérésie ou du paganisme, commencèrent à se livrer à de discrètes enquêtes. Mais comment faire pour savoir la vérité, alors qu'en principe, la belle comtesse Bathory était insoupçonnable et " intouchable " ?

Évidemment, personne n'osait porter officiellement plainte, pas même les parents des jeunes filles disparues qui craignaient trop les représailles, y compris celles de forces diaboliques qu'on disait être au service de la comtesse. Les Bathory et les Nàdasdy étaient bien trop puissants... Mais cela n'empêcha nullement le roi Matthias de Hongrie de prendre l'affaire en main. Convaincu, par certains témoignages, que l'héritière des Bathory était coupable de crimes de sang, il ordonna une enquête qu'il confia au gouverneur de la province, lui-même cousin d'Elizabeth. Le gouverneur se rendit secrètement à Csejthe et s'informa auprès de certaines personnes de confiance, en particulier le curé qui, sans avoir l'intention de le publier de son vivant, avait rédigé un long mémoire dans lequel il signalait quantités de faits pour le moins troublants. L'envoyé du roi Matthias fut très vite édifié, et, lorsqu'il eut fait son rapport, la décision du roi fut implacable: arrêter la comtesse Bathory et tous ses complices. Et cette tâche, il la confia à un autre cousin d'Elizabeth, et qui avait été un temps son amant, son premier ministre, le comte Gyorgy Thurzo.

Le 29 décembre 1610, à la tête d'une troupe armée et accompagné du curé de Csejthe - à qui il arriva d'ailleurs une curieuse aventure à cause d'un groupe de chats ! - et en présence des deux gendres d'Elizabeth Bathory, le comte Thurzo pénétra dans le grand château. La garnison n'opposa aucune résistance et les grandes portes étaient même entrouvertes. Tous purent donc pénétrer à l'intérieur sans aucune difficulté : " Ils allèrent à travers le château, et, accompagnés de gens munis de torches connaissant les entrées des escaliers les plus secrets, descendirent au souterrain des crimes, d'où montait une odeur de cadavre, et pénétrèrent dans la salle de tortures aux murs éclaboussés de sang. Là se trouvaient encore les rouages de la , Vierge de Fer ", des cages et des instruments, auprès des brasiers éteints. Ils trouvèrent du sang desséché au fond de grands pots et d'une sorte de cuve ; ils virent les cellules où l'on emprisonnait les filles, de basses et étroites chambres de pierre; un trou profond par où l'on faisait disparaître les gens; les deux branches du souterrain, l'une conduisant vers le village et débouchant dans les caves du petit château, l'autre allant se perdre dans les collines... Enfin, un escalier montant dans les salles supérieures. Et c'est là, étendue près de la porte, que Thurzo vit une grande fille nue, morte; celle qui avait été une si belle créature n'était plus qu'une immense plaie. A la lumière de la torche, on pouvait voir les traces laissées par les instruments de torture: la chair déchiquetée, les seins tailladés, les cheveux arrachés par poignées; aux jambes et aux bras, par endroits, il ne restait plus de chair sur les os. " Plus loin, toujours dans le souterrain, Thurzo et ses hommes découvrirent plusieurs douzaines de jeunes filles, d'adolescentes et de jeunes femmes. Certaines étaient affaiblies, presque complètement vidées de leur sang; d'autres, dans un état d'hébétude totale, étaient encore intactes : c'était le bétail réservé aux prochaines orgies. Par la suite, on exhuma une cinquantaine de cadavres de jeunes filles dans les cours et les dépendances du château.

Elizabeth Bathory ne se trouvait pas dans le château. Il est vraisemblable de penser qu'après une nuit d'orgie rituelle, elle s'était retranchée dans son repaire constitué par le petit château, son domaine réservé où peu de gens avaient le droit de s'introduire. Lorsque le comte Thurzo se présenta devant elle, elle ne songea pas un seul instant à nier l'évidence. Aux accusations que lui porta légalement son cousin et ex-amant, elle répondit que tout cela relevait de son droit de femme noble, et qu'elle n'avait de comptes à rendre à personne. Sans se laisser impressionner, Thurzo la fit mettre sous surveillance, et la comtesse s'enferma dans un mutisme hautain dont elle ne se départit jamais plus.

Mais la procédure de la justice était en marche et plus rien ne pouvait l'arrêter désormais. Le roi Matthias était décidé à aller jusqu'au bout, Gyorgy Thurzo et les membres des familles Bathory et Nàdasdy également, même s'ils craignaient de supporter les conséquences d'un étalage public des turpitudes de la comtesse. En fait, chacun se trouvait embarrassé, car tout cela éclaboussait la plus haute société austro-hongroise de l'époque. Matthias de Hongrie était le plus acharné à vouloir justice, le comte Thurzo le plus réservé, et aussi le plus calme. Il devait y avoir procès : il aurait lieu, mais on prendrait soin de n'y point faire paraître la principale inculpée, ce qui était une façon élégante de ne pas mouiller certains membres de l'aristocratie qui avaient, sans nul doute, d'une façon ou d'une autre, été complices de la meurtrière. Il fallait des accusés pour en faire des coupables. On se rabattit sur l'entourage immédiat d'Elizabeth. On savait que ceux-là, qui appartenaient aux classes les plus obscures de la société, n'étaient pas dangereux et que leur condamnation servirait d'exutoire.

On a retrouvé le procès-verbal des interrogatoires qui furent menés pendant l'instruction. On est en droit de se demander si ces dépositions ont été acquises au moyen de la torture, méthode pratiquée couramment à l'époque, et c'est pourquoi il convient de les prendre avec toutes les réserves qui s'imposent. Mais ces dépositions ne sont nullement en contradiction avec d'autres témoignages, et avec les bruits qui circulaient depuis fort longtemps sur les atrocités qui se commettaient aussi bien à Vienne qu'à Csejthe à la demande formelle de la comtesse Bathory. Et même s'il faut faire la part de l'exagération et du lavage de cerveau qu'ont subi les témoins, les récits sont hallucinants. Il y a là un accent de vérité qui ne trompe pas: ces témoins, participants actifs des turpitudes d'Elizabeth, donc motivés par une foi énigmatique d'origine païenne et ancestrale, sont parfaitement conscients de ce qu'ils racontent, et d'ailleurs, ils ne manifestent jamais le moindre remords, le moindre sentiment de culpabilité quant à ce qui leur est reproché. A les entendre, tout ce qui s'est passé au château de Csejthe est parfaitement naturel et ne souffre pas d'être discuté. Qu'on en juge sur pièces .



Ainsi, le premier témoin, Ficzko, après avoir avoue avoir tué trente-sept jeunes filles et participé à leur inhumation, est amené à parler de l'origine des victimes et du sort qui leur était réservé : " Dorko et une autre allèrent en chercher. Elles leur dirent de les suivre dans une bonne place de service. Pour une de ces dernières, venant d'un village, il fallut un mois pour la faire arriver et on la tua tout de suite. Surtout des femmes de différents villages s'entendaient pour fournir des jeunes filles 2. Même une fille de l'une d'elles fut tuée; alors la mère refusa d'en amener d'autres. Moi-même, je suis allé six fois en chercher avec Dorko. Il y avait une femme spéciale qui ne tuait pas, mais qui enterrait... Une femme, Szabo, a amené des filles, et aussi sa propre fille, quoique sachant qu'elle serait tuée. jo Ilona aussi en a fait venir beaucoup. Kata n'a rien amené, mais elle a enterré toutes les filles que Dorko assassinait. " On voit ainsi que la comtesse sanglante avait constitué une véritable meute pour rabattre, par tous les moyens, les filles dont elle avait besoin pour assouvir ses passions, ou plutôt pour procéder à ces étranges sacrifices.

Où cela devient presque insupportable, c'est lorsque les témoins donnent des détails sur les supplices. C'est toujours Ficzko qui parle: " Elles (les complices d'Elizabeth) attachaient les mains et les bras très serrés avec du fil de Vienne, et les battaient à mort, jusqu'à ce que tout leur corps fût noir comme du charbon et que leur peau se déchirât. L'une supporta plus de deux cents coups avant de mourir. Dorko leur coupait les doigts un à un avec des cisailles, et ensuite leur piquait les veines avec des ciseaux... jo Ilona apportait le feu, faisait rougir les tisonniers, les appliquait sur la bouche et mettait le fer dedans. Quand les couturières faisaient mal leur travail, elles étaient menées pour cela dans la salle de torture. Un jour, la maîtresse elle-même a mis ses doigts dans la bouche de l'une et a tiré jusqu'à ce que les coins se fendent. Il y avait aussi une autre femme qui s'appelait Ilona Kochiska, et qui a aussi torturé des filles. La maîtresse les piquait d'épingles un peu partout; elle a assassiné la fille de Sitkey parce qu'elle avait volé une poire... La maîtresse a toujours récompensé les vieilles quand elles avaient bien torturé les filles. Elle-même arrachait la chair avec des pinces, et coupait entre les doigts. Elle les a fait mener sur la neige, nues, et arroser d'eau glacée; elle les a arrosées elle-même et elles en moururent... Dans le coche, quand la maîtresse voyageait, elles étaient pincées et piquées d'épingles. "

Le témoignage de la nourrice, jo Ilona, n'est pas moins édifiant: " Elle battait les filles cruellement et Darvulia mettait les jeunes servantes dans l'eau froide et les laissait toute la nuit. La comtesse elle-même déposait dans leur main une clef ou une pièce d'argent rougie au feu. A Sravar, Elizabeth a, devant son mari Férencz Nàdasdy, dévêtu une petite parente de son mari, l'a enduite de miel et laissée un jour et une nuit dans le jardin pour que les insectes et les fourmis la piquent. Elle, jo Ilona, était chargée de mettre entre les jambes des jeunes filles du papier huilé et de l'allumer... Dorko coupait avec des ciseaux les veines des bras ; il y avait tant de sang qu'il fallait jeter de la cendre autour du lit de la comtesse, et celle-ci devait changer de robe et de manches. Dorko incisait aussi les plaies boursouflées et Elizabeth arrachait avec des pinces la chair du corps des filles... C'est de Darvulia qu'Elizabeth apprit les plus graves cruautés ; elles étaient très intimes. jo Ilona savait, et avait même vu, qu'Elizabeth a brûlé le sexe de certaines filles avec la flamme d'un cierge. " Tout cela est corroboré par Dorko : (, La comtesse torturait les filles avec des cuillères rougies au feu, et leur repassait la plante des pieds avec un fer rouge. Leur arrachait la chair aux endroits les plus sensibles des seins et d'ailleurs avec de petites pinces d'argent. Les mordait en les faisant amener au bord de son lit quand elle était malade. En une seule semaine, cinq filles étaient mortes. "

Le reste est à l'avenant et nous prouve que le marquis de Sade, dans son délire somme toute parfaitement inoffensif, n'a rien inventé. Car ces témoignages, quelles que soient les réserves qu'on peut émettre à leur propos, sont terriblement accablants. Et, sans trop risquer de se tromper, il faut bien se résoudre à accepter comme un minimum absolu le chiffre ahurissant de six cents jeunes filles sacrifiées par la comtesse Elizabeth Bathory et ses complices. La comtesse fut évidemment reconnue coupable par les juges qui se penchaient sur son cas. Mais la question se posait quant à la peine qu'elle devait encourir. On sait que le roi Matthias était résolu à condamner la comtesse à mort, quels que fussent ses liens avec l'illustre famille des Bathory. Mais la famille Bathory, et le comte Gyorgy Thurzo le premier, n'avaient aucune envie de salir leur nom en faisant procéder à l'exécution publique d'une des plus grandes dames de l'Empire. Il y eut des négociations, des compromis. On se dit qu'il valait mieux faire passer Elizabeth pour folle que pour une criminelle. Le verdict tomba: les principaux complices, Jo Ilona, Ficzko, Dorko et Katalin Beniezky furent condamnés à la décapitation et rapidement exécutés. Quant à la comtesse de sang royal Elizabeth Bathory, elle fut condamnée à être murée vive dans ses appartements privés du petit château de Csejthe. Sous la surveillance des juges et du comte Thurzo, des maçons murèrent donc les fenêtres et les portes de ses appartements, ne laissant qu'une petite ouverture par laquelle on passerait tous les jours de l'eau et de la nourriture.






Elizabeth Bathory se laissa enfermer sans prononcer une parole. Elle vécut quatre ans dans la solitude et l'obscurité. Aux dires de ceux qui la virent dans son dernier sommeil, en dépit de son âge - très avancé pour l'époque - de cinquante-quatre ans, sa beauté était inaltérée. Et l'on retrouva, dans ses appartements, de nombreux grimoires, et surtout des invocations sataniques dans lesquelles elle conjurait le Diable de faire mourir ses ennemis, le comte Thurzo en tête, et de leur envoyer des démons sous forme de chats noirs. C'est ce qui était arrivé au curé de Csejthe Igrsqu'il avait accompagné les justiciers dans les souterrains du château. Coïncidence? Il est bien certain que la magie, et une magie des plus noires et des plus sinistres, est la seule explication plausible de l'invraisemblable comportement de la comtesse Elizabeth Bathory.

En fait, bien des questions se posent. Dans son invocation faite la veille de son arrestation, Elizabeth Bathory implorait l'aide des puissances maléfiques, demandant particulièrement à Satan, qu'elle appelle le Suprême Commandeur des Chats, de lui envoyer quatre-vingt-dix-neuf chats contre ses ennemis. Or, le curé de Csejthe, auteur du mémoire qu'il espérait bien transmettre un jour, était l'un de ses plus ardents ennemis, bien qu'il fût réduit au silence par peur des représailles. D'après le témoignage du prêtre, lors de la perquisition dans le château, il fut assailli par six chats qui le griffèrent et le mordirent avant d'être chassés par les hommes d'armes et de disparaître comme des fantômes. Hallucination ? Superstition ? Rien n'est bien clair dans cette histoire pourtant réelle de la comtesse Bathory.

Était-elle sorcière ? Incontestablement, ou du moins magicienne, prêtresse d'une religion noire et rouge héritée de la nuit des temps. Il serait vain de prétendre qu'elle était folle. Il serait stupide de ne voir en elle qu'une dépravée sexuelle assouvissant ses désirs pervers sous le couvert de ce qu'elle croyait être son impunité. Certes, la composante sexuelle, sadique et lesbienne, ne fait aucun doute dans son comportement. Mais ce n'est pas suffisant pour expliquer de telles horreurs. Et pourquoi n'a-t-elle sacrifié, ou fait sacrifier, à son culte sanguinaire que des femmes, des filles vierges ? Le sang des vierges a donc tant de vertu qu'il puisse procurer à ceux qui savent en profiter l'immortalité dans la beauté et le printemps éternel ?

Ici, la relation entre le personnage d'Elizabeth Bathory, personnage réel, rappelons-le, et le sinistre comte Dracula, personnage romanesque mais surgi d'une longue tradition et intégré dans un ouvrage de fiction initiatique, est absolument nette. Oui, la comtesse Bathory est une femme vampire se régénérant dans le sang des jeunes vierges qu'elle sacrifie en l'honneur d'une mystérieuse et cruelle déesse des anciens jours. Elle mordait ses victimes, nous dit-on. On n'ajoute pas qu'elle buvait leur sang, mais elle s'en inondait, ce qui revient au même. Aurait-elle pu survivre autant d'années, dans toute sa beauté, sans cette "thérapeutique" quelque peu spéciale ?

Elizabeth Bathory a emporté son secret dans la tombe, si tant est qu'elle ait réellement une tombe. Car les vampires, c'est bien connu, ne meurent jamais vraiment.



source:
vampire http://sylphe.chez-alice.fr/elizabeth.html







L'invocation d'Elizabeth


Aidez-moi, Nuages d'O.
Nuages d'O, séjour à côté de moi.
Ne laissez aucun mal venir à moi.
Laissez-moi rester en bonne santé et invincible.

Envoyez, O envoient, vous nuages puissants, quatre-vingt-dix chats.
Je vous commande, Roi d'O des chats, Je vous prie.
Pouvez vous les recueillir ensemble,
même si vous êtes dans les montagnes,
ou sur les eaux,

ou sur les toits,
ou de l'autre côté de l'océan.
Mai ces quatre-vingt-dix chats semblent déchirer et détruire
les coeurs
des rois et des princes,
Et de la même manière
les coeurs
des professeurs et des juges,
ainsi ils me nuiront pas.
Trinité sainte, protégez-moi.






Dernière édition par invitée le Ven 28 Déc 2012 - 19:15, édité 2 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Ven 1 Oct 2010 - 14:24


« Pour ma part, je trouve que cela ressemble fort aux histoires de vampires comme Dracula qui… dès que le soleil se lève, ils ne peuvent pas sortir, ils doivent alors disparaître et rester hors de sa portée. Il y a une bonne dose de ce symbolisme dans tout ça.

Comme tout ce qui relève des vampires et des histoires de vampires vient de ces entités reptiliennes, je voudrais suggérer que, pour cette raison même, ils peuvent entrer dans notre réalité vibratoire qui est compatible avec eux pour une durée limitée. Au-delà, ils risquent d’être détruits vibratoirement et sérieusement affectés. L’un des moyens qui peut toutefois leur permettre de prolonger leur séjour est la consommation de sang humain.

Parce que le sang humain – qui, comme nous le voyons, est une substance rouge qui circule dans les veines – considéré sur le plan holographique et au niveau universel métaphysique, encore une fois symbolise l’information. Il est relié à un état vibratoire. Par sa consommation, le sang humain véhicule le code génétique humain – l’univers métaphysique – soit le code vibratoire, et cela donne aux vampires reptiliens la capacité de demeurer plus longtemps dans cette réalité.

C’est donc l’une des raisons - et il y en a sûrement d’autres, mais en tout cas c’en est une - pour lesquelles on découvre là où ces lignées sont présentes, des liens avec la pédophilie, le satanisme et les sacrifices humains. Des sacrifices à qui ? Mais… aux dieux ! Les dieux reptiliens qui alimentent cette énergie de terreur, de peur et autres, qu’un sacrifice humain fait monter systématiquement par la façon dont il est pratiqué.

Autre chose: dans … une lumière visible, à l’intérieur de notre gamme de fréquence, quel que soit le nom que vous lui donniez – de notre spectre électromagnétique, une fois dans cette réalité, ces entités consomment des humains comme nous consommons du bétail, des moutons ou d’autres animaux. Et nous retrouvons là un thème qui remonte directement aux temps anciens où les reptiliens mangeaient les humains, aux sacrifices faits aux dieux et tout le reste. Mais, quand elles sortent de cette réalité, de retour dans leur propre réalité vibratoire, ces entités se nourrissent de notre énergie en « vampirisant » notre état énergétique.

Il faut savoir que si je veux vampiriser une source d’énergie, cette dernière doit se trouver à l’intérieur de la gamme de fréquences à laquelle je peux me connecter. S’il s’agit de la fréquence 1, et que je suis sur la fréquence 2, je ne vais pas pouvoir y accéder; il faut donc que j’établisse la connexion. Ils ont, à cet effet, structuré la société pour conserver l’humanité qu’ils ont organisée - mais ce n’est pas la seule raison pour laquelle ils ont procédé ainsi - ils l’ont fait pour nous maintenir dans la portée de la Matrice Lunaire qui opère pour cette même raison dans la même zone de fréquence que celle dont je parle. Ils ont structuré la société de façon à générer la peur maximale, l’angoisse maximale, la frustration maximale, la colère maximale, le conflit maximal.

À cause d’une énergie vibratoire inférieure, de guerres comme les deux Guerres Mondiales, et de trucs comme le 11 Septembre, ils génèrent une somme colossale d’énergie humaine émotionnelle inférieure. Ils se nourrissent de ça, puis cette force, cette nourriture, est recyclée dans le système de contrôle.
»



David Icke

étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t525-race-humaine-releve-toi-david-icke




Dernière édition par invitée le Sam 19 Mar 2011 - 16:35, édité 3 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Ven 1 Oct 2010 - 14:52


« Maintenant, il y a autre chose, monsieur: C'est une de ces choses que les Chitauli aiment faire dans leurs cavernes souterraines, où de nombreux feux sont toujours entretenus, nous a-t-on dit, c'est quand un Chitauli tombe malade et commence à perdre une grande surface de peau sur son corps, on dit qu'il y a une maladie dont les Chitauli souffrent qui leur fait perdre une grande surface de leur peau, leur laissant la chair à vif.

Quand le Chitauli tombe malade ce cette manière, une jeune fille, une vierge, est généralement enlevée par le serviteur du Chitauli et est amenée au lieu souterrain. Là la fille est liée, pieds et poings, et enveloppée dans une couverture d'or, et elle est forcée de coucher près du Chitauli, le Chitauli malade, semaine après semaine, en étant bien nourrie et bien soignée, mais gardée pieds et poings liés, et libérée seulement à certains moments pour la soulager. On dit qu'après que le Chitauli malade ait montré des signes d'amélioration, alors la fille humaine est manipulée pour qu'elle essaye de s'échapper. On lui donne une possibilité de s'échapper, une possibilité qui n'en est pas vraiment une. Alors, quand la fille s'échappe, elle court, mais elle est poursuivie sur une longue distance sous la terre par des créatures métalliques volantes, et elle est reprise quand elle atteint le summum de la peur et de l'épuisement.

Alors elle est étendue sur un autel, habituellement un rocher brut, plat sur le dessus. Ensuite, elle est sacrifiée cruellement, monsieur, et son sang est bu par le Chitauli malade, qui alors se rétablit. Mais, la fille ne doit pas être sacrifiée avant qu'elle ne soit vraiment très effrayée, parce que si elle n'est pas effrayée, on dit que son sang ne sauvera pas le Chitauli malade. Ce doit être le sang d'un être humain vraiment très effrayé.

Or, cette habitude de donner la chasse à une victime était aussi pratiquée par les cannibales africains ordinaires, monsieur. Au Zoulouland, au siècle dernier, il y avait des cannibales qui avaient l'habitude de manger les gens, et leurs descendants, même aujourd'hui, vous diront, s'ils ont confiance en vous, que la chair de l'être humain qui a été effrayé et forcé à courir sur une grande distance, alors qu'il essaie de s'échapper, a bien meilleur goût que la chair de quelqu'un qui a simplement été tué.

Maintenant, monsieur, il y a quelque temps, ici en Afrique du Sud - et la procédure est toujours en cours - cinq filles blanches ont disparu. C'étaient des écolières, monsieur. Chacune de ces écolières était une enfant hautement talentueuse - soit une enfant qui a montré des signes de développement d'un pouvoir spirituel, soit une enfant qui était à la tête de sa classe pour une faculté intellectuelle particulière ou dans une matière scolaire particulière. Cinq de ces enfants ont disparu en Afrique du Sud. C'était une très grosse affaire dans le journal et, à un moment, des Blancs sont venus me voir et m'ont persuadé d'essayer de retrouver ces enfants.

Et un jour un Blanc m'a apporté un jouet de caoutchouc qui appartenait à une enfant blanche qui avait disparu. Et j'ai pris le jouet de caoutchouc dans mes mains et j'ai remarqué que les yeux de la créature semblaient bouger. C'était comme si le jouet de caoutchouc, un jouet dinosaure, allait fondre en larmes. Je me suis senti très mal, comme si j'avais envie de me lever et de m'enfuir. Et alors j'ai dit à ce Blanc, “Écoutez-moi: L'enfant qui avait ce jouet est morte. Qu'essayez-vous de me faire? Cette enfant est morte. Je le sens.”

Et le Blanc, qui était un producteur de télévision, a pris le jouet, les livres scolaires, et le maillot, et il s'en est allé. Et l'écolière blanche a bien été retrouvée morte, enterrée dans une tombe peu profonde près d'une route.

Alors, d'autres gens sont venus me demander de l'aide pour retrouver leurs enfants disparus. Sont-ils morts? Sont-ils vivants? Avant que je puisse faire quoi que ce soit, monsieur - à cette époque j'avais encore un téléphone chez moi - mon téléphone s'est mis à sonner et des gens avec des voix très en colère, des voix de Blancs, m'ont crié dessus et m'ont dit d'arrêter d'aider ces gens. Ils m'ont dit que si je n'arrêtais pas, de l'acide serait jeté sur le visage de ma femme, et que mes enfants seraient assassinés, les uns après les autres.

Et naturellement, mon plus jeune fils a bien été brutalement poignardé, presque à mort, un jour, par des gens mystérieux dont ses amis m'ont dit plus tard qu'ils étaient des gens à la peau blanche. Et c'est pourquoi j'ai arrêté, monsieur.

On m'a dit, de source sûre, que plus de mille enfants disparaissent en Afrique du Sud, presque chaque mois. Et ils disparaissent, pour ne plus jamais être revus. Beaucoup de gens, surtout dans le milieu des journaux, pensent que c'est le résultat des rackets de la prostitution des enfants. Mais je pense que non. Les enfants - si vous vérifiez l'histoire de beaucoup de ces enfants, ils n'étaient pas des enfants des rues ordinaires, monsieur. Ce sont des écoliers qui se distinguent dans leur classe, à cause de certains sujets pour lesquels ils sont doués, ou qui se distinguent dans leur classe par leur capacité à réfléchir.

Non seulement cela, monsieur, mais des femmes ordinaires ont disparu de cette manière, à Masikeng, aussi, à plus ou moins la même époque où les cinq enfants blancs ont disparu. À Masikeng, deux professeurs noirs, des professeurs de sexe féminin, ont disparu dans leur voiture et n'ont plus jamais été revus. Mais je ne veux pas vous infliger, monsieur, le récit de cette terrible histoire.

Mais permettez-moi de vous dire une dernière chose: Après la disparition des cinq écoliers blancs, la police a arrêté un prêtre, un révérend de l'Église réformée blanche, le révérend Van Rooyen. On a dit que c'était Van Rooyen qui était responsable de la disparition de ces pauvres jeunes écolières blanches. Et, il avait été aidé par sa petite amie, qui sélectionnait ces enfants. Avant que Van Rooyen ne puisse comparaître devant un tribunal, une chose très étrange est arrivée. Lui et sa petite amie ont été tués par balles dans leur petit véhicule, un petit camion quatre-quatre. Et, après qu'ils aient été abattus, le camion s'est débrouillé pour s'arrêter - une chose qu'un camion en mouvement ne fait jamais - et par la suite, j'ai été informé par une Blanche qui connaissait Van Rooyen, que Van Rooyen et sa femme n'avaient pas commis ce crime comme la police l'avait dit aux journaux.

En fait, ils avaient été assassinés. Pourquoi? Parce que Van Rooyen a été retrouvé avec une blessure par balle dans sa tempe droite, et pourtant, tous les gens qui le connaissaient savaient qu'il était gaucher. Qui donc a assassiné Van Rooyen et sa femme? C'est à ce jour l'un des plus grands et des plus sinistres mystères d'Afrique du Sud.
»



vampire vampire vampire

« Les Chitauli royaux n'ont pas de cornes autour de leur tête, mais ils ont une crête plus foncée qui s'étend du haut de leur front à leur dos. Ce sont de très gracieuses créatures, nous a-t-on dit, monsieur, mais elles ont - leur petit doigt est une griffe qui est une griffe droite et très acérée, qu'ils utilisent pour l'enfoncer profondément dans les nez humains, afin de boire les cerveaux humains dans l'un de leurs rituels. »


Credo Mutwa

étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t141-temoignage-du-grand-chaman-zoulou-credo-mutwa




Dernière édition par invitée le Sam 19 Mar 2011 - 16:36, édité 4 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Sam 9 Oct 2010 - 18:01

LE VAMPIRISME





J'ai souhaité aborder cet aspect de la réalité occulte.
Disons-le tout de suite, le vampirisme existe, bien sûr, à tous les degrés imaginables, y compris celui qui ne cesse d'alimenter littérature et cinéma, à quelques détails près.

Je ne vais pas consacrer cette page à l'explication du phénomène, ce serait évidemment trop long. Cependant, je pense important d'aborder le sujet de la mort et de la non-mort ("nosferatu", terme qui, en vieux roumain, signifie à peu près "celui qui ne meurt jamais").

L'état de non-mort est produit de multiples manières (dont une "pseudo initiatique", et à laquelle s'adonna le célèbre prince de Valachie, Vladimir "Tepes" Drakul, ayant inspiré Bram Stocker pour son oeuvre "Dracula"). Toujours est-il que le vampirisme, au stade le plus avancé, permet en effet de ne pas mourir après la mort du corps (disons, de rester rivé à la matière dense et de conserver le contrôle sur elle, et sur les "vivants").

Il faut tout d'abord comprendre ce qu'est précisément le vampirisme. La "technique", l'objectif, disons, consiste à absorber l'énergie vitale d'autrui afin de pallier à l'impossibilité d'en produire soi-même lorsque le corps est mort. Cet apport d'énergie fraîche permet à ce dernier de ne pas se décomposer, et donc de garder substantiellement intacte la "corde d'argent" entre l'âme et le corps. Cette "corde" est un lien d'énergie subtile reliant en effet l'âme et le corps au sein duquel elle s'enracine par ce moyen. C'est ce qui différencie un simple fantôme, une entité errante sans réelle influence sur la matière, et un être physique, incarné, qui s'y ébat et s'y développe. La conscience spirituelle étant prise en charge par la conscience biologique (engendrée par le cerveau grâce à la présence de l'esprit, de l'âme, enracinée par la corde d'argent), on peut comprendre d'où vient la raison évidente pour laquelle une grande part de la population du monde ne croit en l'existence d'autre chose que ce qui est immédiatement perceptible, le corps n'étant qu'une sorte de scaphandre permettant de vivre au creux de la matière alors que nous ne sommes finalement que pur esprit.

C'est cet avantage que le vampire refuse de perdre, en plus d'une somme impressionnante de pouvoirs psychiques qui lui est dévolue de par son état vampirique, semi-magique, et disposant malgré tout des atouts des plans du Bas-Astral, allant se ressourcer au sein du plan Vital de la Terre (origine fluidique de tous les cauchemars de l'humanité).

L'énergie dont il a un besoin vital se trouve en très grande proportion dissoute dans le sang, mais sans qu'il soit forcément nécessaire d'en absorber pour en extraire la précieuse vitalité de sa victime. Il peut parfaitement la vampiriser à distance, sans contact physique. En fait, le vampire cumule les avantages d'un esprit désincarné et d'un être humain incarné. Il a autant de pouvoir sur la matière (ou presque) que ce dernier, et pourtant, il lui est possible de disparaître à la vue et de rejoindre les plans spirituels proches de la matière, mais suffisamment éloignés pour ne plus être perceptibles.

Tentative d'accès à la condition vampirique par saturation de sang frais humain.
Technique très risquée se soldant par un échec dans 90% des cas en moyenne. Le mythe du "buveur de sang" viendrait plutôt de la caste "initiatique" intimement associée au vampirisme, le plus célèbre, toujours grâce à Bram Stocker, étant "l'Ordre du Dragon Renversé" auquel appartenait Vladimir Drakul (mais il en existe d'autres, contemporains, beaucoup à Londres, et un, tout particulièrement, à Paris). Son initiateur et Grand-Maître de l'Ordre, était un certain "Abraham le Juif" dont le nom d'initiation était "Eléazar" (nom d'origine hébraïque extrêmement répandu), lui-même enseigné par un mage égyptien appelé Abramelin. Comme dans tous les cercles noirs et satanistes, le sang et la mort sont les deux fers de lance de la politique de terreur appliquée par ceux d'entre eux qui la pratiquent, ainsi que le symbole de leur pouvoir. Mais le "mythe" du vampire est connu depuis la plus haute antiquité et avant cela même; il semblerait qu'il ait "toujours" existé.

En outre, il apparaît que, pour un vampire nouvellement "créé", absorber l'énergie vitale dissoute dans le sang, appelée "Lumière Astrale", est beaucoup plus facile en absorbant le sang lui-même, plutôt qu'en la filtrant à travers le Plan Astral; les subtilités des Plans subtils ne lui étant pas forcément et immédiatement accessibles. En effet, c'est avec le temps et l'expérience qu'il sera amené à les apprendre, raison pour laquelle, plus un vampire est ancien, plus il est difficile d'en venir à bout.

Il existe un livre intitulé "La magie sacrée", ou"Livre d'Abramelin le Mage", que ceux qui le connaissent pour s'être contentés de le feuilleter ou même le lire candidement, trouveront certainement très inspiré d'une grande sagesse et très empreint de piété (revoilà une manifestation de la maestria de l'Illusion...). Ce livre contient des valeurs "renversées" (ou "inversées"); il établit sur six mois la procédure d'un rituel "initiatique" visant à fusionner tout d'abord la conscience de veille avec celle du double sous-plantaire, ensuite parachève cela en faisant de même avec, si possible, l'ensemble des strates de conscience, permettant ainsi, en quelque sorte, de faire émerger à la surface du monde physique le double sous-plantaire; le reflet prenant possession de ce dont il est le reflet en quelque sorte.

Par bien des aspects, le vampirisme est une absolue abomination. Non par rapport à l'ampleur du mal dont il est la cause, mais parce qu'il s'oppose de plein fouet à l'équilibre dualistique des lois naturelles de l'univers, violant le tao, et outrepassant même, dans certains cas, les limites imposées par l'application des manifestations karmiques elles-mêmes. D'où l'intérêt énorme que représente le vampirisme pour la conscience de l'Ombre, voyant en cela une possibilité d'aller encore au-delà de ce qui lui est possible d'atteindre habituellement.

Le texte de "La magie sacrée, ou Livre d'Abramelin le Mage" est bien sûr crypté (bien que faiblement). Tenter de réaliser ce rituel, même sans la clef permettant d'en connaître le sens exact, enchaîne le praticien candide à un egrégore d'aliénation psychique qui, peu à peu... le videra de sa substance vitale. Personnellement, je ne connais AUCUN livre plus dangereux que celui-là, pas même le Necronomicon que l'on dit à juste titre "maudit"; Lovecraft s'étant contenté de ne se faire que le relai de quelque chose de bien plus puissant que lui!

Quant aux moyens de contrer le vampire, la croix ne marche pas, ou alors vraiment très peu (ce symbole, devenu religieux, a trop été perverti depuis l'aube du Christianisme pour qu'il ait quelque effet fondamental sur lui). L'ail fonctionne, à condition qu'il soit consumé sur des charbons ardents afin d'en dégager les huiles essentielles (encore qu'en en ayant beaucoup consommé, le sang puisse en être suffisamment empreint pour représenter une certaine forme de gêne pour le vampire, mais, néanmoins toute relative), idem pour le camphre et le citron (avec une préférence tout de même pour le camphre). L'eau bénite est plus qu'incertaine mais peut se révéler efficace si le prêtre effectue, lors de sa bénédiction, le travail "magique" qu'il est sensé effectuer à cette occasion (je connais certaines paroisses catholiques où le bénitier est rempli d'eau du robinet, sans même qu'une bénédiction symbolique soit faîte dessus). Le pieu dans le coeur (à condition que ce soit le plexus solaire et non le coeur lui-même) est lui aussi redoutable, mais à condition de trouver le corps physique du vampire qui est son point d'ancrage au monde de la matière, donc son point faible.

Lui enfoncer le pieu, ou n'importe quoi de contondant, quelle qu'en soit la matière, dans le plexus solaire, le diaphragme, placé transversalement le long de l'abdomen juste sous les côtes, revient à détruire cet organe qui, seul, a la propriété d'y amarrer la corde d'argent. Ce lien brisé, le vampire disparaît comme n'importe quel trépassé sans réel autre pouvoir... mais l'histoire n'en est alors pas fini pour autant; être "mort" ne signifie pas "avoir cessé d'exister"!

Le tout est tout de même de réussir à atteindre le corps physique du vampire, ce qu'il ne laissera pas faire facilement on peut s'en douter. Il est en outre redoutablement bien gardé, en général, soit totalement inaccessible ou très bien caché. Il a souvent été question de meutes de chiens enragés gardant le corps du vampire au péril de leur vie, ou de déments dévolus à sa cause corps et âme.

La mort n'est donc pas une fin, et encore moins pour le vampire que pour quiconque, car il s'agit pour lui d'une réelle naissance à une condition sensée être gratifiante, une condition de puissance, de pouvoirs, et d'absolue immortalité. Des dynasties entières de la noblesse roumaine s'y sont adonnées entre le quinzième et le dix-huitième siècle (dont peut-être la plus célèbre des praticiennes du vampirisme et du culte rendu à Satan, chaque jour de sa vie jusqu'à celui de sa mort, aux côtés de son frère avec lequel elle entretenait une sulfureuse relation incestueuse, c'est Erszebeth Bathory).

Partout, la trace des vampires fut consignée et il en reste des procès-verbaux originaux à la Bibliothèque Nationale à Paris, signés par des délégations préfectorales de l'époque. Les points géographiquement reconnus comme étant les plus atteints par le fléau vampirique étaient la Roumanie, en effet (rendue célèbre par Stocker, bien sûr), mais aussi la Hongrie, l'Autriche, et, plus particulièrement, l'Auvergne et la Lorraine pour ce qui est de la France.

Il faut aussi savoir qu'il existe des magiciens noirs qui pratiquent ce genre de sport, allant absorber l'énergie vitale de leurs victimes, détruisant ainsi leurs ennemis tout en se gonflant d'une vitalité dérobée sur des êtres humains qu'ils s'acharnent à transformer en "zombies" d'abord, puis en esclaves, et finalement en cadavres!

Le vampirisme occulte est une tragique réalité, quel que soit le moyen employé ou le but poursuivi, même s'il tend à disparaître, surtout pour ce qui est des vampires au sens premier du terme; les conditions de "vie" en l'état de "non-mort" sont devenues quelque peu... difficiles, ces derniers temps.

Pour ceux qui seraient tentés par un accroissement de leur force vitale, mais que le goût du sang ou de la mort ne tente pas forcément, j'ai pensé mettre à leur disposition un schéma radionique d'une déconcertante simplicité*, découvert et mis au point par un certain Monsieur H.O.BUSBY, l'un des pionniers en matière de découvertes radioniques, et qui a pour propriété de générer une intense énergie vitale, seulement "volée" à la nature qui ne demande qu'à en faire bénéficier qui sait le lui demander gentiment. Vous en trouverez donc la recette de fabrication à la rubrique "Petit grimoire".



* Tiré du livre de CONDE et FELSENHARDT : "Les bases fondamentales de la radionique", aux éditions Jacques Bersez.




vampire vampire vampire


Ce texte m' a été transmis par un ami; hélas, je n'en connais pas la source.
Certaines idées émises me semblent très intéressantes et complètent ce que nous avons déjà au sujet de ces "entités" prédatrices de l'humanité (Néphilims/reptiliens/lignées Illuminati...).

Je trouve qu'il y a là un lien avec certains passages des écrits de Joël Labruyère:

Ce sont des entités anormales qui " squattent " dans l'au-delà en soutirant leur vitalité aux créatures de la Terre.
Dans l'univers, tout organisme doit s'alimenter. Le monde invisible n'échappe pas à la règle. Normalement, l'activité déployée par l'homme génère du carburant utilisable par les êtres dépourvus de nos organes d'assimilation.

Nous inhalons des énergies cosmiques que nous transmutons, et que nous ré-émettons sous des formes subtiles. Privés de cette capacité, des êtres ne disposant pas de nos organes physiques, peuvent parfaitement se maintenir dans l'au-delà de manière anormale, en se branchant sur ces courants d'énergie extraits de la pile humaine.

C'est le grand secret de la vie; dans l'au-delà tout est nourriture. Alors que les êtres divins - les anges réguliers - puisent leur énergie directement à la source des rayonnements cosmiques, au contraire, les entités rebelles qui sont attachés au plan terrestre utilisent l'homme comme relais énergétique. Ils y sont contraints s'ils veulent continuer à survivre dans l'au-delà en dehors du temps qui leur est accordé entre la mort et une nouvelle naissance. (Que ceux qui ne croient pas en la réincarnation utilisent l'idée du Purgatoire, et cela suffira. La résultat est le même.)

C'est là une vérité fondamentale qu'on dissimule aux êtres humains afin qu'ils continuent à produire de l'énergie sans se révolter. Car cet échange énergétique prend un caractère de vampirisme lorsque les créatures de l'au-delà sont aussi avides que nombre d'habitants de la Terre. Pourquoi seraient-elles différentes de ce qu'elles ont été durant leur vie ? Elles ne sont pas plus conscientes, et même beaucoup moins.

Depuis des millions d'années, il s'est organisé une vie parasitaire dans le monde invisible, une vie qui n'est que le reflet des structures sociales, politiques et religieuses des diverses civilisations qui se sont succédées. Cette vie fantomatique est fortement développée sur le plan astral avec ses aspects supérieurs faussement " angéliques " ou au contraire ses enfers grouillant d'entités rétrogrades ainsi que la vermine vivant des passions inférieures de l'humanité: vices, perversions, excès, crimes...toutes les passions fournissent de la nourriture. Il faut comprendre que toute cette vie anormale n'est que la conséquence de notre manière de vivre, de penser et de sentir. L'homme qui était originellement un " dieu créateur " alimente ces domaines invisibles par sa pensée et ses émotions.

Les Grecs disaient que " l'homme est le bétail des dieux ".


[...]

Mais voilà le fond du problème. Si cette pénurie qui entraîne un délabrement du reflet astral de la civilisation, n'est pas dramatique pour les âmes qui transmigrent avant de reprendre une nouvelle incarnation, elle est par contre ressentie comme un danger mortel par certaines entités irrégulières qui ne veulent pas revenir en incarnation.

II s'agit d'entités qui font partie de la haute hiérarchie occulte des égrégores. Pour ces êtres qu'on appelle les " anormaux de l'au-delà ", et qui veulent survivre indéfiniment sans redescendre dans le physique, la situation actuelle est limite. Il y a un déficit de nourriture subtile, et leurs abris de l'astral s'effritent et se désagrègent.


[...]

Ces puissances ceinturent l'espace, et emprisonnent les grands égrégores des religions et des civilisations que la Bible appelle " la Grande Babylone ". Nous parlons ici des Princes de ce monde, les barons féodaux de Satan dont le nom signifie " adversaire ".

Ils s'appuient sur une hiérarchie très complexe s'étendant depuis des sphères invisibles très élevées - de notre point de vue - jusqu'aux étages les plus obscurs du bas astral, et même en-dessous du plan matériel, où il y a des dimensions encore plus denses. Ce système constitue le double monde - visible et invisible - de l'univers relatif.


[...]

Sur les plans intermédiaires, il y a les prédateurs organisés en fraternités, en réalité des syndicats du crime et du racket de l'énergie humaine. C'est une mafia cosmique.

[...]

Ces divinités parasitaires n'ont pas de conscience selon notre entendement moral. Ces éons sont inconscients, ne pensant qu'à dévorer de l'énergie, étrangers à nos souffrances. Ils sont sourds à notre désir de libération, et ils s'y opposent de toutes leurs forces - c'est ce qui est symbolisé par le grand Satan.

étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t44-astralisme-channeling-et-faux-prophetes-les-fumees-du-new-age


Il y a deux façons de procéder [pour devenir immortel]. La première est de suivre la voie régulière qui permet à l'âme de retrouver ses facultés divines originelles. La seconde est la voie anormale qui pousse un être à se hisser dans les degrés supérieurs de la hiérarchie qui contrôle la dimension terrestre.

[...]

Des entités irrégulières se sont octroyées une place dans les basses hiérarchies grâce à un développement occulte qui leur permet de ne pas revenir en incarnation. Ces entités sont organisées en concessions exploitant les réserves énergétiques de l'âme humaine. Ce commerce malsain remonte à une très haute antiquité. Ces entités ont parfois usurpé l'identité et même l'apparence des dieux qui coiffent le circuit du système solaire. Ces faux dieux et ces entités irrégulières forment les basses hiérarchies planétaires. C'est un circuit fermé rejeté hors du monde divin.

Il s'entretient par la récupération de l'énergie de l'âme humaine qui seule peut synthétiser la force universelle fondamentale. C'est pourquoi, la méthode privilégiée pour capter l'énergie de l'âme demeure les rites et la prière. Du fait que les religions ont perdu le monopole du culte des divinités, il s'est développé un système médiatique international qui pompe une énergie énorme quoique d'un taux vibratoire déprécié. Ce système permet donc aux célébrités d'accéder au statut de demi dieux aux yeux des foules qui veulent des idoles à adorer à la place des divinités démodées.

Cette crise nécessitera au final de faire apparaître un personnage messianique qui se présentera comme le sauveur, l'avatar divin descendu sur la terre.


[...]

Alors, comment devient-on immortel ?

Sur la voie régulière, il faut le désir sincère et conscient de revenir à notre origine - pour autant que l'on ait conservé la nostalgie de ce paradis perdu.
Sur la voie des anormaux des basses hiérarchies, il faut le désir de devenir un dieu en enfer - parce qu'on ne sait plus d'où l'on est venu, et qu'on ne voit pas d'autre façon d'avancer que la fuite en avant.


étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t452-comment-on-devient-immortel-joel-labruyere




Dernière édition par invitée le Mer 4 Mai 2011 - 16:45, édité 8 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Mar 18 Jan 2011 - 17:58


« Zack a raconté qu’il avait été emmené de la maternelle jusqu’à une maison. Là, il avait été attaché et contraint d’assister au sacrifice d’un petit garçon. Il a dit que lui et les autres enfants ont du boire le sang et manger la chair de l’enfant mort.
(...)

La mère d’un autre petit garçon de la maternelle, Tyler, âgé de quatre ans, a dit que son fils lui avait demandé “si c’était bien que les gens se mangent entre eux”. (...) Il a ajouté aussi: “[i]Ils mettent du sang dans les flocons d’avoine à l’école
”.

(...)

Les parents de Zack, qui avait tout juste cinq ans à l’époque, m’ont dit qu’il s’était mis à parler des Anunnakis, et que quand ils lui ont demandé ce que c’était, il a dit qu’il a appris dans la “méchante école” qu’ils étaient les “dieux”. Suzen lui a demandé s’il avait déjà entendu le mot “dingir” (elle prononçait “dingear”), nom donné aux Anunnakis en Mésopotamie et qui se traduit par “The righteous ones of the blazing rockets” (Les justes aux fusées ardentes). En le prononçant “ding-er”, il a dit que c’était un vilain mot, parce que les Dingers “mangent la peau des gens, le sang des gens et les os des gens”. Il a ajouté: “Leur amour s’en va et ils se changent en vampires”. »


David Icke

étoile 1 http://transition888.heavenforum.org/t580-souffrez-petits-enfants-david-icke


Revenir en haut Aller en bas
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Sam 7 Mai 2011 - 2:06

L'HYPOTHÈSE DES VAMPIRES GALACTIQUES







Richard Shaver a écrit : "J. Edgar Hoover nous raconte que plus de 120.000 Américains sont portés disparus chaque année et que l'on entend plus jamais parler d'eux ensuite. Je peux vous dire que j'ai vu [sous terre] de mes propres yeux certains de ces Américains, pendus à des crochets de boucher sur les marchés à viande Dero ! » (Richard Shaver, Why the caves are secret, circa 1950).

Les chiffres avancés par Richard n'étaient pas farfelus. Il semblerait même qu'ils soient une constante. Aujourd'hui, le fichier Américain des personnes disparues comporte environ 100.000 noms inscrits en permanence. Dans le reste du monde, bien que les statistiques soient plus difficiles à établir, on estime que 2.000.000 de personnes sont rapportées disparues chaque année. En France, le chiffre est de 6.500.

Prise séparément, chacune de ces disparitions peut sembler acceptable intellectuellement. On peut bien entendu former des hypothèses individuelles pour toutes. Et ces hypothèses ne sont pas de nature à remettre en cause notre vision du monde. Mais un changement de grossissement dans l'échelle de notre regard ne devrait-il pas faire surgir naturellement d'autres hypothèses ? Que dire de milliers, de millions, de personnes disparaissant chaque année sans laisser de traces ? Si le Capitalisme a pu faire de chaque humain une machine, si le Nazisme a pu faire de chaque individu une chose qui une fois exterminée peut être valorisée sous forme de marchandise (savon, métaux précieux, couvertures en cheveux), ne peut-on pas envisager - sans que cela soit forcément outrancier - qu'il existe un projet visant à faire de l'humain sa nourriture ? Se pourrait-il que chaque année un certain nombre de femmes, d'enfants, d'hommes se trouvent prélevés de leur enclos pour servir de friandise à des Vampires Galactiques ?

On opposera à mon hypothèse qu'un tel évènement ne passerait pas inaperçu. Que « cela se saurait ». Je répondrai seulement que l'extermination par les Nazis de 6 millions d'individus a pu se faire au vu et au su de tous sans que quiconque ne puisse ou ne veuille le voir.

On m'opposera ensuite que de tels enlèvements ne sont tout simplement pas possibles, que des plaintes en nombre considérable devraient être déposées chaque jour concernant la disparition d'individus. À ceci je répondrai que l'INSEE a estimé le nombre de personnes vivant en permanence sans abri à 86.000 en 2001. Les associations d'aide aux sans-abris estiment pour leur part que ce nombre est sûrement supérieur à 100.000. C'est-à-dire que dans notre pays, on estime à 100.000 le nombre permanent de personnes désocialisées et donc invisibles. Aux USA, on estime que chaque nuit de n'importe quelle année, entre 700.000 et 2.000.000 de personnes dorment dehors et donc, n'ont plus aucune existence sociale. Si un nombre plus ou moins important de ces personnes étaient enlevées et disparaissaient, qui pourrait rendre compte de leur disparition alors qu'elles n'existent pas ?

Tous ces chiffres donnent le vertige. Et seul un ajustement placide de nos certitudes nous permet de maintenir l'équilibre précaire de notre vision du monde. Rien de tel n'existe à la condition de penser que rien de tel ne puisse exister. Rien de tout ceci n'arrive jusqu'à ce qu'un Vampire Galactique ne surgisse devant vous armé de son livre de cuisine.

L'aveuglement personnel a toujours été la meilleure arme silencieuse des guerres les plus secrètes*.



* Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars est le titre d'un texte écrit par l'auteur conspirationniste Bill Cooper.




source:
vampire http://shavertron.over-blog.com/article-30487005.html



Revenir en haut Aller en bas
invitée



Localisation : Tarn

MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Sam 28 Mai 2011 - 17:02

LA ROYAUTÉ BRITANIQUE MANGEAIT DE LA CHAIR HUMAINE
(mais ne vous inquétez pas, c'était il y a 300 ans)





Ils ont longtemps été connus pour leur amour des banquets somptueux et des riches recettes. Mais ce qui est moins connu, c'est que la famille royale britannique avait également un penchant pour la chair humaine.
Un nouveau livre sur le cannibalisme médicinal a révélé que, peut-être aussi récemment que la fin du 18ème siècle, la royauté britannique ingérait des morceaux de corps humain.
L'auteur ajoute que ce n'était pas une pratique réservée aux monarques, mais que cette dernière était répandue parmi les gens aisés en Europe.



Le cannibalisme médicinal: Tant la reine Mary II que son oncle le roi Charles II ont consommé
du crâne d’homme distillé sur leur lit de mort en 1698 et 1685 respectivement, selon le Dr Sugg.


Alors qu'ils dénoncaient les cannibales barbares du Nouveau Monde, ils appliquaient, buvaient, ou portaient de la poudre de momie égyptienne, de la graisse, de la chair, des os, du sang, de la cervelle, et de la peau humaine.

De la mousse prélevée sur le crâne de soldats morts a même été utilisée comme remède dans les saignements de nez, selon le Dr Richard Sugg de l'Université de Durham.

Le Dr Sugg a déclaré: « Le corps humain a été largement utilisé comme agent thérapeutique, les traitements les plus populaires incluant chair, os, ou sang.

Le cannibalisme a été pratiqué non seulement dans le Nouveau Monde, comme on le croit souvent, mais aussi en Europe.

Une chose qu'on nous enseigne rarement à l'école, alors que les textes littéraires et historiques de l'époque en attestent, est la suivante: James Ier a refusé la médecine par les cadavres; Charles II a transformé son propre corps en médicament, et Charles Ier a été transformé en médicament par les cadavres.

Avec Charles II, les utilisateurs ou prescripteurs éminents incluaient François Ier, le chirurgien d'Elizabeth I John Banister, Elizabeth Grey, la Comtesse de Kent, Robert Boyle, Thomas Willis, William III et la Reine Mary.
»



Nouveau monde: Représentation de cannibalisme dans la tribu Tupinamba du Brésil tel que décrit par Hans Staden en 1557.
Que ceci soit vrai ou non, le mythe a ignoré le fait que les Européens consommaient de la chair humaine.


L'histoire du cannibalisme médicinal, fait valoir le Dr Sugg, a soulevé un certain nombre de questions sociales importantes.

Il dit: « Le cannibalisme médicinal s'est servi du poids formidable de la science européenne, de l'édition, des réseaux commerciaux, et de la théorie informée.

Alors que la médecine par les ccadavres a parfois été présentée comme une thérapie médiévale, elle était à son apogée lors des révolutions sociales et scientifiques du début de la Grande-Bretagne moderne.

Elle a survécu jusqu'au 18ème siècle, et parmi les pauvres, elle a persisté obstinément à l'époque de la reine Victoria.
Indépendamment de la question du cannibalisme, l'approvisionnement en parties de corps nous semble désormais très contraire à l'éthique.

À l'apogée du cannibalisme médicinal, des corps ou des os ont été systématiquement extraits de tombeaux égyptiens et de cimetières européens. Non seulement cela, mais jusqu'au dix-huitième siècle la plus grande part des importations en provenance d'Irlande en Grande-Bretagne étaient constituée de crânes humains.

Que tout cela ait été pire ou non que le marché noir contemporain d'organes humains est difficile à dire.
»



Cette peinture de l’exécution de Charles Ier en 1649 montre des gens se précipitant
pour récolter le sang de l’ancien roi. On pensait que ce dernier avait des propriétés curatives.


Le livre donne de nombreux exemples vivants, et souvent dérangeants, de la pratique, allant des échafauds d'exécution en Allemagne et en Scandinavie, aux tribunaux et laboratoires d'Italie, de France et Grande-Bretagne, aux champs de bataille de Hollande et d'Irlande, et aux tribus anthropophages des Amériques.

Le Dr Sugg dit: « Un tableau représentant l'exécution de Charles I 1649 montrait des gens récoltant le sang du roi avec des mouchoirs.

En Europe continentale, où la hâche tombait systématiquement sur le cou des criminels, le sang était le traitement de choix pour de nombreux épileptiques.

Au Danemark, le jeune Hans Christian Andersen a vu des parents faire boire à leur enfant malade du sang à l'échafaud. Ce traitement était si populaire que les bourreaux demandaient régulièrement à leurs assistants de recueillir le sang dans des coupes alors qu'il jaillissait du cou des criminels mourants.

Parfois, un patient pouvait court-circuiter ce système. Lors d'une exécution au XVIème siècle en Allemagne, un vagabond saisit le corps décapité " avant qu'il ne retombe, et en bu le sang... "
»

Le dernier cas enregistré de cette pratique en Allemagne s'est produit en 1865.

Alors que Jacques Ier avait refusé de consommer du crâne humain, son petit-fils Charles II aima tellement l'idée qu'il acheta la recette. Ayant payé peut-être £ 6,000 pour cela, il distillait souvent du crâne humain lui-même dans son laboratoire privé.

Le Dr Sugg dit: « En conséquence, connu depuis longtemps comme "gouttes du roi", ce remède fluidique a été utilisé contre l'épilepsie, les convulsions, les maladies de la tête, et souvent comme un traitement d'urgence pour les mourants.

Ce fut la toute première chose que Charles rechercha le 2 Février 1685, au début de sa dernière maladie, et qu'on lui administra, non seulement sur son lit de mort, mais sur celui de la Reine Mary en 1698.
»

Les recherches du Dr Sugg seront présentées dans un prochain documentaire de Channel 4, avec Tony Robinson, dans lequel ils reconstituent des versions de traitements cannibales plus anciens à l'aide de cervelles, sang, et crâne de porcs.

Le livre, intitulé Mummies, Cannibals and Vampires sera publié le 29 Juin par Routledge, et retrace l'histoire de la médecine du cadavre européenne en grande partie oubliée, de la Renaissance à l'époque victorienne.









source:
vampire http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1389142/British-royalty-dined-human-flesh-dont-worry-300-years-ago.html#ixzz1MujgdSpz






vampire vampire vampire





Corpse medicine: mummies, cannibals, and vampires





Imagine that you are out walking one evening in 1680, in the Wiltshire countryside near Avebury. Suddenly you spy two men, bent over a long, low artificial mound, vigorously plying spades. Before them a third figure is stooped intently over what seems to be a heap of white sticks. Still oblivious of your presence, he now lifts up something that is clearly not a stick. As he shifts the lantern in his other hand and the shadows flicker across his face, you have momentarily the strange illusion that he is speaking, perhaps whimsically interrogating the skull that sits in his outstretched palm.

But by now you have relaxed. It is, of course, none other than the worthy Dr Toope, genteel physician to the citizens of Marlborough. What is he doing? Well, certainly nothing underhand or disreputable. As he himself explained in a letter to the gentleman diarist John Aubrey, in 1685, he had « stored myself with many bushels » of these bones, derived from the ancient burial mound of West Kennet. From these « I made a noble medicine that relieved many of my distressed neighbours. »

We could be forgiven for thinking that Toope was something of an eccentric, and for reassuring ourselves that his cannibalistic medicine was a very dry one, sourced from old and anonymous skeletons. In fact, Toope's activities were just one small thread in the complex web of early-modern corpse medicine. Up until the late 18th century, the human body was a widely accepted therapeutic agent. The most popular treatments involved flesh, bone, or blood, along with a variety of moss sometimes found on human skulls.

Some way into the 19th century, crowds still jostled beneath the execution scaffold in parts of Denmark, cups raised to catch the precious drops of warm blood as it spilled from the dying body of the felon above. These people were hoping to cure their epilepsy. Their belief ran back almost 2000 years, to the Rome of the physician Celsus, where patients would gain this quintessential fluid from the bodies of wounded gladiators. Although such uses of blood seem a long way from the world of Toope, medical vampirism was by no means limited to folk medicine. The Italian Renaissance scholar, Marsilio Ficino (himself the son of a physician) had recommended that human blood could act not just as a specific curative, but as a kind of elixir of life. The elderly might, he suggested, restore their vitality by sucking directly from a vein in the arm of some healthy youth. Towards the end of the 17th century, we find a Franciscan monk making a kind of jam or marmalade from human blood (« stir it to a batter with a knife… pound it… through a sieve of finest silk »).

In two of those cases the blood is very fresh indeed: we cannot strictly refer to it as corpse medicine. The most popular substance of this tradition was, by contrast, of almost fabulous antiquity. If you see the word “mummy” in an early-modern text, the chances are that it will refer to flesh from a mummified body. Applied topically or mixed into drinks, this was a common remedy for bruising in the period. Among others, the French King, Francis I (1494—1547) « always carried it in his purse, fearing no accident, if he had but a little of that by him ». Francis Bacon asserted that « mummy has great force in staunching of blood ». So highly prized was it that, along with the large quantities plundered from Egyptian burial chambers, there was also a profitable trade in counterfeit varieties, including the flesh of beggars and of camels.

But a second kind of flesh began to rival that of the ancient Egyptians as the 17th century wore on. The Swiss-German medical reformer, Paracelsus, favoured more or less fresh corpses. « If doctors were aware of the power of this substance », he insisted, « no body would be left on the gibbet for more than three days ». Paracelsus' follower, the influential German chemist, Johann Schroeder, recommended « the cadaver of a reddish man (because in such a man the blood is believed lighter and so the flesh is better), whole, fresh without blemish, of around twenty-four years of age, dead of a violent death (not of illness), exposed to the moon's rays for one day and night ». Although this flesh would itself be treated so that « it comes to resemble smoke-cured meat, without any stench », the specifications clearly imply a desire to use the human body as a kind of elixir of life — hence the youth and health of the corpse.

In his letter to Aubrey, Toope did not say precisely what his “noble medicine” was for. But we do know that in February of that year Charles II was given large doses of “spirit of skull” against the convulsions that racked him on his deathbed. Until quite recently, the mildly antiseptic sphagnum moss has been used against haemorrhaging, particularly during warfare. In the early-modern period, the preferred choice of styptic was “usnea”, or “the moss of the skull”. It was recommended by the Belgian chemist, Jean Baptiste van Helmont, the educational reformer and minister, Richard Baxter, and the natural philosopher, Robert Boyle. The latter reported his controlled experiments on usnea, and cured his own nosebleeds by merely holding the moss at arm's length (while Baxter himself seems to have inserted it directly into his nostrils).

Corpse medicine did have some opponents in the 16th and 17th centuries. Referring to counterfeit mummy (and possibly also to the Paracelsian kind) the French royal surgeon, Ambroise Paré, lamented in 1585 that « we are… compelled both foolishly and cruelly to devour the mangled and putrid particles of the carcasses of the basest people of Egypt, or such as are hanged ». Just a few years earlier, in 1580, the enlightened French thinker Michel de Montaigne had attacked the hypocrisy of those Europeans who condemned new world anthropophagy, while happily using mummy themselves. Some time before his death in 1566 the herbalist Leonhard Fuchs had attacked this « gory matter of cadavers… sold for medicine », wondering « who, unless he approves of cannibalism, would not loathe this remedy? ».

Yet there was no question of such antagonists banishing the practice. Indeed, even Paré bases his objection partly on the fact that mummy does not work; he would, he implies, have been prepared to use it if it had. On another occasion, he notes how a patient complained when he was not given mummy after a fall from his horse. It was not until the late 18th century that hostility to corpse medicine became widespread and effective. In 1751, the physician and botanist John Hill found « the swallowing the flesh and bones of our fellow creatures » to be “shocking”. By 1782, the physician William Black, talking of « loathesome or insignificant » remedies such as « Egyptian mummies » and « dead men's skulls powdered », could claim that these « and a farrago of such feculence, are all banished from the pharmacopeias ».

What can we learn from the surprisingly neglected history of corpse medicine? We can reasonably infer, for one thing, that it was not merely scientific evidence that finally banished mummy from mainstream medical practice. It seems to have fallen victim, in part, to a more general ideology of progress and enlightenment, as well as to a new kind of gentility, in which the human body (living or dead) far more easily provoked disgust. Without wishing to congratulate our own era too unwarily, we can also argue that recent changes in attitudes to medical history have given us a much more open, much richer view of the past than was previously available.

Writing in 1929, Howard H Haggard imagines the desperate labours of Charles II's deathbed physicians as a kind of « pharmaceutical debauch », in which « Raleigh's antidote, pearl julep, and ammonia » were all « forced down the throat of the dying king… Charles was helpless before the drugging of his physicians ». (Haggard's book was reprinted as recently as 1980.) The antidote patented by Sir Walter Raleigh contained (among other things) spirit of skull. In 1971, F M Valadez and C D O'Malley describe such therapies as « irrelevant and nasty » — a phrase alarmingly similar to Black's « loathesome and insignificant » medicines. Somehow, none of these writers could bear to admit that the seemingly bizarre remedies of the past were real to those who prescribed or used them. Clearly Charles's physicians believed in what they were doing: at the most basic pragmatic level it was in their interests to save the life of their most influential client. And Charles himself, far from being “helpless”, was in fact one of the country's keenest users of spirit of skull. He had reputedly paid the physician William Goddard £6000 for the recipe; he frequently prepared it himself in his private laboratory; and it was the very first thing he took (perhaps as instinctively as you or I might reach for paracetamol or echinacea) when he first awoke, “feeling ghastly” on February 2, 1685.

For a long time charges of cannibalism were used as an effective slur against tribal peoples in the Americas and Australasia. It was perhaps partly this that prompted the anthropologist William Arens to write his 1979 book, The Man-Eating Myth, claiming that anthropophagy was an entirely fictitious affair. Most scholars in relevant fields now accept that ritual cannibalism has occurred for centuries. There is evidence to suggest that it was still occurring in Brazil in the 1960s. When studying early-modern medicine, we need as far as possible to know what happened, and why. What did it mean to those engaged in it? How might seemingly bizarre or taboo practices have been legitimised? How have taboos and allegedly universal instincts changed radically over time? How entirely rational and homogeneous (by contrast) is the medicine of an age where doctors tell you to take your cold to bed, and pharmaceutical companies tell you to take it to work? For a long time historians have behaved rather like Arens. They have sought to protect medicine as a whole, and perhaps the past itself, from the potent slur of cannibalism. Like good anthropologists, those studying medical history need to see the past as interestingly different, rather than dangerously wrong.


Richard Sugg




source:
vampire http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(08)60907-1/fulltext






vampire vampire vampire









Dernière édition par invitée le Ven 28 Déc 2012 - 19:26, édité 5 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Contenu sponsorisé




MessageSujet: Re: SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES   Aujourd'hui à 9:38

Revenir en haut Aller en bas
 
SATANISTES MANGEURS D'HUMAINS - VAMPYRES
Voir le sujet précédent Voir le sujet suivant Revenir en haut 
Page 1 sur 1

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
TRANSITION ET ARCHE :: PLAN DE NOS PRÉDATEURS :: Contrôle mental :: Réseau mondial d'enlèvements, viols, tortures et sacrifices d'enfants-
Sauter vers: